Oklahoma Democrats act against youth violence:
The first legislative session kicked off this month with Democrats taking steps to combat youth violence. This will be a priority for Democrats over the next year.
"...the Legislature has provided only $1 million for gang-intervention programs" said Rep. Mike Shelton in October of 2006.
"And they've even tried to cut that funding."
(The Journal Record- Oct. 5, 2006)
To kick off this session- Democrats introduced a measure which would establish the "Oklahoma Anti-Gang Task Force" designed to coordinate law-enforcement efforts with state leaders.
Legislators also called for a 58 million dollar appropriation to pay for raises for teachers. This will take pressure off of schools who have had to dip into operating funds to meet their salaries.
"These are people we've forgotten about," said Representative Al McAffrey. "We cannot ask those people who provide such important services for our children to provide for their families on such low wage."
(Associated Press- Feb. 1, 2007)
Wednesday, February 28, 2007
Democratic Precinct Meetings Planned March 8th
Oklahoma City, OK- February 28, 2007 - All politics begins at the local level and for Oklahoma Democrats precinct meetings are some of the most critical gatherings. The ODP has planned statewide precinct meetings on March 8th. Call the ODP at 405.427.3366 to find your local meeting or log onto www.okdemocrats.org and click the "calendar."
State Party Chairman Lisa Pryor said precinct meetings are the most critical meetings for proactive Democrats to attend.
"If you want to have a personal and immediate impact in building a better government, one that protects and serves the people of Oklahoma, this is your opportunity to have a voice in the Oklahoma Democratic Party," Pryor said. "Help build the party you want to see."
Delegates will cast votes at the County Convention (March 31), the District Convention (April 28th) and State Convention (May 19th).
Pryor said the path to victory begins at the precinct level.
"It is critical that we have participation at the March 8th precinct meetings. As Democrats our goals are to regain control of both the State House and State Senate, to reclaim a seat in the U.S. Senate, to help a Democratic candidate carry the state of Oklahoma in the presidential election in 2008," Pryor said. "I encourage all Oklahoma Democrats to get involved, to make a difference and be part of this vision. The road to change and the path to victory start on March 8th."
Oklahoma Democratic Party
Jason McCarty
Communications Director
jasonmccarty@okdemocrats.org
405.427.3366
Oklahoma City, OK- February 28, 2007 - All politics begins at the local level and for Oklahoma Democrats precinct meetings are some of the most critical gatherings. The ODP has planned statewide precinct meetings on March 8th. Call the ODP at 405.427.3366 to find your local meeting or log onto www.okdemocrats.org and click the "calendar."
State Party Chairman Lisa Pryor said precinct meetings are the most critical meetings for proactive Democrats to attend.
"If you want to have a personal and immediate impact in building a better government, one that protects and serves the people of Oklahoma, this is your opportunity to have a voice in the Oklahoma Democratic Party," Pryor said. "Help build the party you want to see."
Delegates will cast votes at the County Convention (March 31), the District Convention (April 28th) and State Convention (May 19th).
Pryor said the path to victory begins at the precinct level.
"It is critical that we have participation at the March 8th precinct meetings. As Democrats our goals are to regain control of both the State House and State Senate, to reclaim a seat in the U.S. Senate, to help a Democratic candidate carry the state of Oklahoma in the presidential election in 2008," Pryor said. "I encourage all Oklahoma Democrats to get involved, to make a difference and be part of this vision. The road to change and the path to victory start on March 8th."
Oklahoma Democratic Party
Jason McCarty
Communications Director
jasonmccarty@okdemocrats.org
405.427.3366
What is YOUR personal impact on global warming?
Everyone leaves a carbon footprint behind and if you are curious what yours is there is a website that can help determine this. Your energy consumption in your household and your car determine your direct impact. To see the full picture one must think about the total impact. To determine your complete impact you would have to take into account the energy that Target or Wal-Mart must use for you to shop there (among other services you use). Understanding these impacts can help each of us offset our own impact.
You can visit this website to calculate your impact on our enviroment.
Those of you who want to learn more do not forget Al Gore will be speaking on Global Warming at The University of Oklahoma tomorrow, March 1st. Doors open at 3pm at the Lloyd Noble Arena.
Tuesday, February 27, 2007
Yellow Dog Democrat Event
What: Oklahoma Democratic Party will be hosting a viewing of the Academy Award Winning Documnetary An Inconvenient Truth.
Who: All Yellow Dog members and friends are invited to attend!
Where: Oklahoma Democratic Party Headquarters
George Krumme Center
4100 N. Lincoln Blvd
Oklahoma City, OK
When: Tuesday March 6th at 6p.m.
There will be movie style refreshments and snacks!
Please RSVP to lcox@okdemocrats.org
Who: All Yellow Dog members and friends are invited to attend!
Where: Oklahoma Democratic Party Headquarters
George Krumme Center
4100 N. Lincoln Blvd
Oklahoma City, OK
When: Tuesday March 6th at 6p.m.There will be movie style refreshments and snacks!
Please RSVP to lcox@okdemocrats.org
Al Gore, 45th Vice President of the United States and bestselling author of and Academy Award winner for An Inconvenient Truth will deliver a presentation on global warming.
Thursday, March 1, 4:00p.m. at the
Doors will open at 3 p.m. Please use the main east lower section entrance. Also no backpacks, video or still cameras will be allowed. Bags are subject to search.
For further information or accomodations please contact the Office of Special Events at (405)325-3784
Black History Month
"BLACK WALL STREET"
"A Dream Lost "
"A Dream Lost "
A little- known chapter of African-American history in Oklahoma as told to Ronald E. Childs. If anyone truly believes that Columbine High School massacre or the on the Federal building in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, was the most tragic bombing ever to take place on United States soil as the media has been widely reporting, they're wrong plain and simple. That's because an even deadlier bomb occurred in the same state to forget that it ever happened. Searching under the heading of "riots," "Oklahoma," and "Tulsa" in current editions of the World Book Encyclopedia, there is conspicuously no mention of the Tulsa race riot of 1921, and this omission is by no means a surprise, or a rare case. The fact is, one would be hard-pressed to find documentation of the incident, let alone an accurate accounting of it, in any other "scholarly" reference or American history book. That's precisely the point that noted author, publisher and orator Ron Wallace, a Tulsa native, sought to make nearly five years ago when he began researching this riot, one of the worst incidents of violence ever visited upon people of African descent. Ultimately joined on the project by colleague Jay Jay Wilson of Los Angeles, the duo found and compiled indisputable evidence of what they now describe as,
"The Black Holocaust in America."
"The Black Holocaust in America."
The date was June 1, 1921, when "Black Wall Street," the name fittingly given to one of the most affluent all-black communities in America, was bombed from the air and burned to the ground by mobs of envious whites. In a period spanning fewer than 12 hours, a once thriving 36-black business district in northern Tulsa lay smoldering-A model community destroyed, and a major African-American economic movement resoundingly defused. The night's carnage left some 3,000 African-Americans dead, and over 600 successful businesses lost. Among these were 21 churches, 21 restaurants, 30 grocery stores and two movie theaters, plus a hospital, a bank, a post office, libraries, schools, law offices, a half-dozen private airplanes and even a bus system. As could be expected, the impetus behind it all was the infamous Ku Klux Klan, working in consort with ranking city officials, and many other sympathizers. In their self-published book,
"Black Wall Street: A lost dream," The authors have chronicled for the very first time in the words of area historians and elderly survivors what really happened there on that fateful summer day in 1921 and why it happened.
Ron Wallace similarly explained to Black Elegance why this bloody event from the turn of the century seems to have had a recurring effect that is being felt in predominately Black neighborhoods even to this day. The best description of Black Wall Street or Little Africa as it was also known would be to liken it to a mini-Beverly Hills. It was the golden door of the Black community during the early 1900s, and it proved that African-Americans had successful infrastructure. That's what Black Wall Street was about. The dollar circulated 36 to 1000 times, sometimes tacking a year for currency to leave the community. Now in 1999, a dollar leaves the Black community in 15 minutes. As far as resources, there were Ph.D's residing in little Africa, Black attorneys and Doctors. One Doctor was Dr. Berry who also owned the Bus system. His average income was $500 a day, a hefty pocket change in 1910. During that era, physicians owned medical school. There were also pawn shops everywhere, brothels, jewelry stores, 21 churches, 21 restaurants and two movie theaters. It was a time when the entire state of Oklahoma had only two airports yet six Blacks owned their own Airplanes. It was a very fascinating community. The area encompassed over 600 businesses and 36 square with a population of 15,00 African-Americans. And the lower-economic Europeans looked over and saw what the Black community created, many of them were jealous. When the average student went to school on Black Wall Street he wore a suit and tie because the morals and respect they were taught at an early age. The mainstay of the community was to educate every child. Nepotism was the word of they believed in. and that's what we need to get back to in 1999.
The main thoroughfare was Greenwood Ave, and Archer and Pine Streets intersected it. From the First letters in each of those names you get G.A.P., and that’s where the renowned R&B music group the GAP Band got it's name. They're from Tulsa. Black Wall Street was a prime example of the typical Black community in America that did business, but it was in an unusual location. You see, at the time, Oklahoma was set aside to be Black and Indian State. There were 28 Black Townships there. One third of the people who traveled in the terrifying " Trail of Tears" alongside the Indians between 1830 to 1842 were Black people. The citizens of this proposed Indian and Black State chose a Black Governor, a treasurer from Kansas named McDade. But the Ku Klux Klan said that if he assumed office they would kill him within 48 hours. A lot of Blacks owned farmland, and many of them had gone into the oil business. The community was so tight and wealthy because they traded dollars hand-to-hand, and because they were dependent upon one another as a result of Jim Crow laws. It was not unusual that if a resident's home accidentally burned down, it could be rebuilt within a few weeks by neighbors. This was the type of scenario that was going on day-to-day on Black Wall Street. When Blacks intermarried into the Indian culture, some of them received their promised 40 acres and a mule, and with that came whatever oil was later found on there properties, just to so how wealthy a lot of Black people were, there was a Banker in a neighboring town who had a wife named California Taylor. Her father owned the largest cotton gin west of the Mississippi River. When California shopped, she would take a cruise to Paris every three months to have clothes made. There was also a man named Mason in nearby agner County who had the largest potato farm west of the Mississippi. When he harvested, he would fill 100 box cars a day. Another Brother not far away had the same thing with a Spinach farm. The typical family then was Five children or more, though the typical farm family would have 10 kids or more who made up the nucleus of labor. On black Wall Street, A lot of global business was conducted. The community Flourished from the early 1900s until June 1, 1921. That’s when the largest massacre of nonmilitary Americans took place, and it was lead by the Ku Klux Klan. Imagine walking out of your front door and seeing 1,500 homes being set ablaze. It must have been amazing. Survivors that were interviewed think the whole thing was planned because during that time that the massacre was going on, White families with their children stood around on the borders of the community and watched the carnage, the looting and everything ---much in the same manner that they would watch a lynching.
DO YOU KNOW WHERE THE WORD PICNIC ORIGINATES FROM?
It was was typical to have a picnic on Friday nights in Oklahoma. The word is short for "pick a Nigger" to lynch. They would lynch a black male and cut off body parts for souvenirs. This went on every weekend in this country.
"Why Did It Happen"
The riots weren't caused by anything Black or White. It was caused by jealousy. A lot of white folks had come back from World War 1 and they were poor. When they looked over into the Black communities and realized that the Black men who fought in the war had come home heroes, this helped trigger the destruction. It cost the Black community everything, and not a single dime of restitution--no insurance claims-- have been awarded to the victims to this day. None the less, they rebuilt. We estimate that 1,500 to 3,00 people were killed and we know that a lot of the bodies were buried in mass graves all around the city. Some were dumped in the river. As a matter of fact, at 21st street and Yale Avenue, where there now stands a Sears parking lot, that corner used to be a Coalmine. They threw a lot of the bodies into the shafts. Black American don't know about this story because we don't the word Holocaust to our struggle. Jewish people use the word, holocaust. It's politically correct to use it. But when we Black folks use the H word, people think we're being crybabies or that we're trying to bring up old issues. No one comes to our support. In 1910, our forefathers and mothers owned 13 million acres of land at the height of racism in this country, so the Black Wall Street book prove the nay sayers and revisionists that we had our act together. Our mandate now is to begin to teach our children about our own ongoing Black holocaust. They have to know when they look at our communities today that we don't come from this.
This is the last day of BLACK HISTORY MONTH, I would like to thank all of the readers for letting me share with you this month a little about Black History.
Teresa Hill
Pelosi Urges Bush to Join Democrats in Helping States Fund Shortfall in Children's Health Insurance
"President Bush heard again this weekend from Democratic and Republican governors that unless
"While the President has given no indication that he will address this immediate need, I urge him to make the right choice and work with Democrats to fund this shortfall.
"The President's budget, which addresses funding after 2007, makes the wrong choice and could result in more children losing their health coverage over the next five years. Millions of low-income children who count on SCHIP are counting onMonday, February 26, 2007
IF YOU CAN READ THIS,
THANK A TEACHER . . . .
Thank a teacher and a thank every legislator who supports the Honesty in Funding Education Act, HB 1935, sponsored by Rep. Jerry McPeak, D-Warner.
You can thank them today by joining with the House Democrats at the State Capitol Press Room today at 1 p.m. or send them emails today urging their support of this important piece of legislation that will insure that the legislature keeps its past and future promises to teachers and school administrators.
The House Democrats will meet today flanked by school administrators and teachers to show their support of a bill that will insure payment for an unfunded mandate sent to them last year related to teachers' salary increases. In addition the Honesty in Funding Education bill will require the legislature to determine full education appropriations in a timely fashion so that local school boards and their administrators can make financially sound decisions related to hiring staff for the next school year.
HB 1935 is part of the House Democrats' Vision for Oklahoma's Second Century agenda.
The Honesty in Funding Education Act would fulfill the commitment made to school districts during the 2006 session of the State Legislature.
During the 2006 session the Legislature mandated that school districts give teachers in the state an increase in pay of $3,000. However, in spite of commitments made on the floor by House Leadership, the Legislature failed to appropriate monies to the school districts that would cover the costs associated with the pay raises.
“The fact is the State Legislature required all schools to pay all teachers an additional $3,000 by law, the extra costs created by the raise should also be paid,” said McPeak. “This is an unfunded mandate.”
“When the bill was presented before the Legislature last session we were guaranteed by the House Republican Leadership that the extra costs to the school districts would be appropriated by the bill,” said former school superintendent Ray McCarter, D- Marlow. “The people of Oklahoma were lied to.”
Many school districts were forced to spend money out of their operational budgets for the pay raises. Now schools budgets are falling short and the money is needed for basic costs. Shortfalls due to this unfunded mandate may result in some teachers losing their job.
“Although raises have been given to teachers in the recent past, cuts in general operational dollars made in 2002 and 2003 have never been restored,” said Representative McCarter. “Now, school districts are must divert a portion of what’s left of operational money to cover unfunded mandates.”
“We didn’t keep our word. We sent schools an unfunded mandate” said McPeak. “It’s as simple as that. This has nothing to do with this year’s budget. This was agreed to last year.”
“Diminishing operational dollars means less money in the classroom,” said McCarter. “The bottom line is that schools across the state have already spent the money from the operational budget this year and it is up to the legislature to restore it.”
Representative McPeak conducted an interim study over the summer and fall of 2006, working with school superintendents and administrators from across the state. House Bill 1935 is the result of that study. Dubbed the Honesty in Funding Education Act, the bill would appropriate $56 Million to school districts across the state to make up for the monies that were not appropriated last session. Representative McPeak has been told by House Republican Leadership that his bill will not be heard in committee.
“This bill was worked on all summer by school administrators from across Oklahoma and representing a variety of school districts. It was non-partisan,” said McPeak. “No one knew what political party anyone belonged to and it makes no difference. Now, that session has started, folks inside the Capitol are making it political.”
“This is not honest or open government. You either keep your word or you don’t. Politicians made a big splash by promising teacher pay raises. The House required that the schools spend the money based on that promise and gave them the money to spend.”
“If this bill would come to the floor, it would pass overwhelmingly,” said McPeak. “Most of the men and women in the House of Representatives are honest. The people of Oklahoma deserve the opportunity for their elected representatives to cast an up or down vote on House Bill 1935.”
If you are an honest citizen, educator, parent, or student please join the House Democrats for this important press conference today, if you are unable to attend, please encourage your legislator to support this important legislation. Email addresses for all House members are provided below.
dennisadkins@okhouse.gov; donarmes@okhouse.gov; johnauffet@okhouse.gov; garybanz@okhouse.gov; chrisbenge@okhouse.gov; scott.bighorse@okhouse.gov; lisajbilly@okhouse.gov; gusblackwell@okhouse.gov; davidbraddock@okhouse.gov; neilbrannon@okhouse.gov; mikebrown@okhouse.gov; ed.cannaday@okhouse.gov; johncarey@okhouse.gov; lancecargill@okhouse.gov; wallace.collins@okhouse.gov; anncoody@okhouse.gov; mariancooksey@okhouse.gov; jamescovey@okhouse.gov; dougcox@okhouse.gov; david.dank@okhouse.gov; david.derby@okhouse.gov; daledewitt@okhouse.gov; joedorman@okhouse.gov; rexduncan@okhouse.gov; jerryellis@okhouse.gov; john.enns@okhouse.gov; george.faught@okhouse.gov; darrellgilbert@okhouse.gov; larryglenn@okhouse.gov; rebeccahamilton@okhouse.gov; terryharrison@okhouse.gov; jwhickman@okhouse.gov; weshilliard@okhouse.gov; chuck.hoskin@okhouse.gov; terryhyman@okhouse.gov; terryingmire@okhouse.gov; scott.inman@okhouse.gov; mikejackson@okhouse.gov; shanejett@okhouse.gov; dennis.johnson@okhouse.gov; robjohnson@okhouse.gov; tadjones@okhouse.gov; fred.Jordan@okhouse.gov; charlie.joyner@okhouse.gov; sallykern@okhouse.gov; charles.key@okhouse.gov; kiesel@okhouse.gov; luckylamons@okhouse.gov; guyliebmann@okhouse.gov; allindley@okhouse.gov; ken.luttrell@okhouse.gov; scott.martin@okhouse.gov; stevemartin@okhouse.gov; al.mcaffrey@okhouse.gov; mccarter@okhouse.gov; mark.mccullough@okhouse.gov; jeanniemcdaniel@okhouse.gov; randy.mcdaniel@okhouse.gov; ryanmcmullen@okhouse.gov; skye.mcniel@okhouse.gov; jerrymcpeak@okhouse.gov; kenmiller@okhouse.gov; dannymorgan@okhouse.gov; richardmorrissette@okhouse.gov; jason.murphey@okhouse.gov; billnations@okhouse.gov; ronpeters@okhouse.gov; pampeterson@okhouse.gov; ronpeterson@okhouse.gov; gregpiatt@okhouse.gov; anastasia.pittman@okhouse.gov; eric.proctor@okhouse.gov; rcpruett@okhouse.gov; brian.renegar@okhouse.gov; mikereynolds@okhouse.gov; philrichardson@okhouse.gov; paulroan@okhouse.gov; waderousselot@okhouse.gov; colby.schwartz@okhouse.gov; earl.sears@okhouse.gov; tw.Shannon@okhouse.gov; mikeshelton@okhouse.gov; bensherrer@okhouse.gov; jerryshoemake@okhouse.gov; jabarshumate@okhouse.gov; glensmithson@okhouse.gov; krissteele@okhouse.gov; danielsullivan@okhouse.gov; randyterrill@okhouse.gov; mikethompson@okhouse.gov; todd.thomsen@okhouse.gov; suetibbs@okhouse.gov; johntrebilcock@okhouse.gov; daleturner@okhouse.gov; purcywalker@okhouse.gov; weldon.watson@okhouse.gov; paulwesselhoft@okhouse.gov; susanwinchester@okhouse.gov; treborworthen@okhouse.gov; johnwright@okhouse.gov;
House Democrats and Educators to Team Together for Honesty in Funding Education Act
Representative
They will be joined by educators from across the State to call for the Honesty in Funding Education Act to be heard in the House.
For more information contact
Who: House Democrats
When: Tuesday, February 27th, 2007, 1:00 p.m.
Where: The
Democratic Mayor of Tulsa Hosts Roundtable with Tribes
Kathy Taylor, the visionary Mayor of Tulsa, is reaching out to tribes in her area by hosting a roundtable forum with three of the biggest and most successful tribal governments in Oklahoma. The historic meeting revolved centered on economic development in and around Tulsa.
Osage Chief Jim Gray said, "This is a huge step in breaking down these artificial barriers that have kept us from working together. The fact that you have all three tribal leaders sitting at the same table with Mayor Kathy Taylor shows there is a willingness."
Read the full Tulsa World story.
Medallion Dinner 2007 GuestsNAACP State Chairman Roosevelt Milton and members of the Georgia Brown Federation of Democratic Women enjoyed the festivities at the recent Oklahoma County Medallion Dinner hosted by Oklahoma County Democratic Party officers Kitti Asberry, Ron Wasson, and Lynn Green.
Five years after 9/11, America remains less safe than it should be.
More than five years after 9/11 and more than four years into the war in Iraq, the American people are less safe than they should be. Democrats are ready with the tough AND smart policies needed to change course, from implementing the recommendations of the bipartisan 9/11 Commission to holding President Bush accountable for change in Iraq.
9/11 Recommendations
Five years after 9/11, America remains less safe than it should be.
Iraq is serving as a "cause celebre" for recruiting and training new generations of terrorists, Afghanistan is sliding backwards, and Osama Bin Laden remains on the loose.
The American people demanded a change, and that's just what Democrats are delivering.
Democrats will start by completing implementation of the much-needed recommendations of the bipartisan 9/11 Commission.
President Bush's failed policies have made America less safe. Now more than ever, Congress must ensure the highest quality of security for the American people.
Iraq
President Bush is ignoring a bipartisan majority of Congress, his own military commanders, and the American public in escalating the war and is leading us on a path to strategic defeat in Iraq.
The American people have demanded a change of course in Iraq and Democrats are committed to holding President Bush accountable.
One possible option is to restructure the Authorization of the Use of Military Force that gives President Bush the authority to conduct this war.
The President's authorization in Iraq is outdated and needs to be modified. Congress authorized this President to go to war to stop Saddam Hussein from developing weapons of mass destruction and from aiding Al Qaeda terrorists. We now know that no WMD ever existed, and Saddam Hussein had no connection to Al Qaeda.
Congress set the mission in Iraq four years ago, and Congress can set the appropriate mission now.
America's security deserves a tough and smart strategy that will force Iraqis to take control of their own country, redeploy our troops, and refocus our efforts on battling the very real and growing threat of terrorism
There is no one piece of legislation that will bring this war to an end. Democrats will continue to look at ways to force the President to change course and will examine the appropriate legislative vehicles for our proposals.
More than five years after 9/11 and more than four years into the war in Iraq, the American people are less safe than they should be. Democrats are ready with the tough AND smart policies needed to change course, from implementing the recommendations of the bipartisan 9/11 Commission to holding President Bush accountable for change in Iraq.
9/11 Recommendations
Five years after 9/11, America remains less safe than it should be.
Iraq is serving as a "cause celebre" for recruiting and training new generations of terrorists, Afghanistan is sliding backwards, and Osama Bin Laden remains on the loose.
The American people demanded a change, and that's just what Democrats are delivering.
Democrats will start by completing implementation of the much-needed recommendations of the bipartisan 9/11 Commission.
President Bush's failed policies have made America less safe. Now more than ever, Congress must ensure the highest quality of security for the American people.
Iraq
President Bush is ignoring a bipartisan majority of Congress, his own military commanders, and the American public in escalating the war and is leading us on a path to strategic defeat in Iraq.
The American people have demanded a change of course in Iraq and Democrats are committed to holding President Bush accountable.
One possible option is to restructure the Authorization of the Use of Military Force that gives President Bush the authority to conduct this war.
The President's authorization in Iraq is outdated and needs to be modified. Congress authorized this President to go to war to stop Saddam Hussein from developing weapons of mass destruction and from aiding Al Qaeda terrorists. We now know that no WMD ever existed, and Saddam Hussein had no connection to Al Qaeda.
Congress set the mission in Iraq four years ago, and Congress can set the appropriate mission now.
America's security deserves a tough and smart strategy that will force Iraqis to take control of their own country, redeploy our troops, and refocus our efforts on battling the very real and growing threat of terrorism
There is no one piece of legislation that will bring this war to an end. Democrats will continue to look at ways to force the President to change course and will examine the appropriate legislative vehicles for our proposals.
Living Black History: Astronomer Beth Brown Boldly Goes Where Few Have Gone Before
By: Michael H. Cottman, BlackAmericaWeb.com
Dr. Beth Brown, an astrophysicist at NASA, turned a teenage interest in Star Trek and Star Wars into a scientific career studying outer space.
Her area of expertise is not the usual employment choice for most black women – the evolution of celestial bodies, planets, the solar system and far-away galaxies that shine brightly in the X-ray region of the electromagnetic spectrum and can reach temperatures of 10 million degrees.
In short, Brown is an astronomer.
"When I was younger I read a lot of science fiction books and growing up I watched Star Trek," Brown told BlackAmericaWeb.com. "I wanted to be an astronaut, but in college I chose astronomy as a field of scientific study. My parents raised me with love to be an ambitious woman."
Ambitious may be an understatement.
Brown, 38, received her Bachelor of Science degree in Astrophysics from Howard University, and received a Master of Science degree and doctoral degree in Astronomy from the University of Michigan. She is the first African-American woman to earn a doctorate from the University of Michigan's Department of Astronomy.
Brown has also been listed as one of the Women of NASA, an interactive project designed to encourage young women to pursue careers in math, science and technology by providing as role models outstanding women in NASA.
A native of Roanoke, Va., Brown has worked at the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center in Maryland as a scientist in the Astrophysics Science Division. And she makes a clear distinction that she studies astronomy, not astrology.
"I’m not Miss Cleo," she said, noting people often confuse the two areas of concentration.
"I love to learn about, not only the solar system, but our galaxy and universe," Brown said. "Indeed, much of my research has focused on galaxies beyond our own."
Brown started her NASA career at the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center as a research associate for the National Research Council. Prior to that, she joined the National Space Science Data Center, and later relocated to the X-ray Astrophysics Laboratory providing science support and data acquisition. Brown has conducted research on galaxies using data from several observatories, including NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory.
Most recently, Brown was honored as one of 11 awardees for the NASA Administrator's Fellowship Program, a program designed to ensure the strength of the nation's scientific and technical workforce. She is a member of the American Astronomical Society and the National Society of Black Physicists, for which she previously served on the Executive Board.
"What I enjoy about the teaching, is finding interesting and exciting material to combine with the information presented in the textbook, and then turning that into a lecture that makes sense to someone just starting to learn about astronomy and physics," Brown said.
"In working for NASA, I have enjoyed working with the Public Affairs Office from time to time, doing live TV interviews on topics of interest, such as solar eclipses," she said. "I may not have had those opportunities in another job."
Brown said she also enjoys talking to young people about her job and can best serve as a role model for black youth who aspire to be part of the space program "by continuing to follow my pursuits with dedication and enthusiasm."
Some of Brown’s speeches over the years have included, "Discoveries from NASA Space Science," "Characteristics of Stars and the Effect of Light Pollution," "African-Americans in the NASA Space Science Enterprise," and "Exploring Research Opportunities in Space Science."
"I still like science, because I am still curious about how something works and why something exists," Brown said in an interview for NASA.
"Space continues to fascinate me," she said. "I love my job because I get to work on several different things, and there's always something new being discovered. Sometimes (as with any job) things can get frustrating. But I surround myself with supportive friends and family who help me to get through the tough times. And I also maintain a life outside of work, which keeps me balanced."
Last year, Brown returned to Howard University where she is one of 11 recipients of the NASA Administrator’s Fellowship Program.
NASA started the fellowship program nine years ago to ensure the strength of the Nation’s scientific and technical workforce. The program is designed to enhance the professional development of NASA employees and faculty of minority-serving institutions. The program strives to increase the capability of minority institutions to respond to NASA’s research, development, and educational needs.
There have been 71 fellows selected since the program’s inception in 1997. Previous participants have been instrumental in securing individual and institutional research awards, mentoring students to pursue NASA-related research, and encouraging graduates to pursue a career at a NASA Center.
The program is managed and administered by the United Negro College Fund Special Programs Corporation in Fairfax, Va., for NASA’s Office of Education.
"I have gained some attention for being the first African-American woman to obtain a doctorate from the University of Michigan Department of Astronomy, however I do not focus on that," Brown told BlackAmericaWeb.com. "Instead, I focus on those activities that satisfy me as a professional astronomer."
My Fellow Americans....An Inconvenient Truth
Congratulations to former Vice-President and winner of the popular vote in 2000 Al Gore for his tremendous work in "An Inconvenient Truth" recognized last night by the Academy of Motion Pictures as this year's best documentary film. Read about it here.
Gore's much anticipated announcement that he's running for president of the United States did not come last night, although he spoke twice and twice used the phrase "My Fellow Americans". However, rumors continue to swirl that he will be a candidate in 2008. From the recognition and applause last night he may have more respect and potential Hollywood contributors for his possible campaign than either Hillary or Obama have and that's saying a lot at this time.
PROTECT OUR WATER, PROTECT OUR RIGHTS
(Chair's Note: This request is from Canadian County Democratic Party Chair Jody Harlan and Sierra Club member. Her contact information is below. She's asking fellow Democrats to join with her in demanding that our state legislators protect our water. I urge you to contact your legislator this morning about the importance of protecting our environment ---- our water, our land, and our skies. Please help today. Make a call, send an email. Do something.)
PLEASE HELP! The laws that protect clean water in Oklahoma are under attack at the State Capitol by animal factory corporations and their friends who have benefitted from their campaign donations. Whose side are you on?
PLEASE VOTE NO ON HB 1470 - Would you drink water from waterways next to miillions of gallons of livestock waste? Sometimes livestock waste IS hazardous.
Millions of gallons of livestock feces and urine containing hydrogen sulfide gas, arsenic, ammonia, phenols and pathogens are definitely hazardous -- contrary to HB 1470 which is on the House Calendar for Monday, 02/26/07. This bill would grant special privileges and slash the cost of properly disposing of livestock waste for out-of-state, large-scale factory farming corporations at the expense of Oklahoma citizens' health and property rights. Under the provisions of HB 1470, an unscrupulous factory farmer could mix livestock waste with plutonium, pocket the profit, damage his neighbors' health and property, pass the cleanup costs along to taxpayers and still meet the "nonhazardous" definition. It's likely that legislation like this would keep Oklahoma's Attorney General from seeking Superfund dollars to clean up abandoned Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs) or making any animal waste polluter responsible for damage under Superfund laws. We don't want CAFOs next to their homes, family farms and businesses, especially if safety regulations are no longer adequate. Animal factory owners get the profits and should tbe responsible for cleaning up their own messes -- not pass the cost along to taxpayers. Please vote NO on HB 1470.
PLEASE VOTE NO ON HB 1392 - Environmental plans should not give polluters a "free pass."
HB 1392, which is also on the House calendar for Monday, 02/26/07, sets up a fragmented, unworkable system guaranteed to provoke more controversy and much greater risk to clean water in Oklahoma. Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFO’s) following resource conservation management plans, required by this legislation, would be presumed to be in compliance with the law – no matter how much they were actually polluting Oklahoma streams, reservoirs and aquifers. This legislation gives immunity to high incidence polluters with failing environmental plans, while passing along the clean up costs to taxpayers. The plans are just another layer of paperwork on top of all the existing paperwork required. No funding is allocated to pay for additional work assigned to agencies responsible for oversight.
Our Centennial year is the wrong time to weaken Oklahoma laws that have maintained clean water and clean air in our state for the last 10 years. We don't want to end up like Arkansas with its compromised water, damaged reputation and loss of tourism. Please vote no on HB 1470, HB 1392 and similar legislation.
House of Representatives Email Addresses:
dennisadkins@okhouse.gov; donarmes@okhouse.gov; johnauffet@okhouse.gov; garybanz@okhouse.gov; chrisbenge@okhouse.gov; scott.bighorse@okhouse.gov; lisajbilly@okhouse.gov; gusblackwell@okhouse.gov; davidbraddock@okhouse.gov; neilbrannon@okhouse.gov; mikebrown@okhouse.gov; ed.cannaday@okhouse.gov; johncarey@okhouse.gov; lancecargill@okhouse.gov; wallace.collins@okhouse.gov; anncoody@okhouse.gov; mariancooksey@okhouse.gov; jamescovey@okhouse.gov; dougcox@okhouse.gov; david.dank@okhouse.gov; david.derby@okhouse.gov; daledewitt@okhouse.gov; joedorman@okhouse.gov; rexduncan@okhouse.gov; jerryellis@okhouse.gov; john.enns@okhouse.gov; george.faught@okhouse.gov; darrellgilbert@okhouse.gov; larryglenn@okhouse.gov; rebeccahamilton@okhouse.gov; terryharrison@okhouse.gov; jwhickman@okhouse.gov; weshilliard@okhouse.gov; chuck.hoskin@okhouse.gov; terryhyman@okhouse.gov; terryingmire@okhouse.gov; scott.inman@okhouse.gov; mikejackson@okhouse.gov; shanejett@okhouse.gov; dennis.johnson@okhouse.gov; robjohnson@okhouse.gov; tadjones@okhouse.gov; fred.Jordan@okhouse.gov; charlie.joyner@okhouse.gov; sallykern@okhouse.gov; charles.key@okhouse.gov; kiesel@okhouse.gov; luckylamons@okhouse.gov; guyliebmann@okhouse.gov; allindley@okhouse.gov; ken.luttrell@okhouse.gov; scott.martin@okhouse.gov; stevemartin@okhouse.gov; al.mcaffrey@okhouse.gov; mccarter@okhouse.gov; mark.mccullough@okhouse.gov; jeanniemcdaniel@okhouse.gov; randy.mcdaniel@okhouse.gov; ryanmcmullen@okhouse.gov; skye.mcniel@okhouse.gov; jerrymcpeak@okhouse.gov; kenmiller@okhouse.gov; dannymorgan@okhouse.gov; richardmorrissette@okhouse.gov; jason.murphey@okhouse.gov; billnations@okhouse.gov; ronpeters@okhouse.gov; pampeterson@okhouse.gov; ronpeterson@okhouse.gov; gregpiatt@okhouse.gov; anastasia.pittman@okhouse.gov; eric.proctor@okhouse.gov; rcpruett@okhouse.gov; brian.renegar@okhouse.gov; mikereynolds@okhouse.gov; philrichardson@okhouse.gov; paulroan@okhouse.gov; waderousselot@okhouse.gov; colby.schwartz@okhouse.gov; earl.sears@okhouse.gov; tw.Shannon@okhouse.gov; mikeshelton@okhouse.gov; bensherrer@okhouse.gov; jerryshoemake@okhouse.gov; jabarshumate@okhouse.gov; glensmithson@okhouse.gov; krissteele@okhouse.gov; danielsullivan@okhouse.gov; randyterrill@okhouse.gov; mikethompson@okhouse.gov; todd.thomsen@okhouse.gov; suetibbs@okhouse.gov; johntrebilcock@okhouse.gov; daleturner@okhouse.gov; purcywalker@okhouse.gov; weldon.watson@okhouse.gov; paulwesselhoft@okhouse.gov; susanwinchester@okhouse.gov; treborworthen@okhouse.gov; johnwright@okhouse.gov;
For more information contact Jody or Tim at:
Tim Wagner
Colata "Jody" Harlan
426 Poplar Avenue
Yukon, OK 73099-2659
354-3189 hwinc@cox.net
Sunday, February 25, 2007
Cash and Carry
The lead in today's Tulsa World story about Speaker Lance Cargill's questionable shakedown of lobbyists , including scheduling offsite appointments with them in 15-minute increments, is remarkable given his push this week for an ethics reform bill that would, at a minimum, cost the state an additional minimum $400,000. Read today's full story here.
Lobbyists exposed the GOP shakedown last year and new reports indicate that the practice, styled after the GOP K Street Project that was largely responsible for the downfall of that party in Congress in November, is continuing under the leadership of Cargill at 23rd and Lincoln. Last year's scandal at the State Capitol was "pay to play." This year's growing scandal is "cash and carry." The central figure in each of these unethical schemes: Lance Cargill.
For more on this story read The Oklahoman, The Oklahoma Gazette, and The Norman Transcript.
Stay tuned as the story continues to develop...
Coburn Admits Republican Colleagues Care More About Power than People
From this morning's Flashpoint. . . .
Ultra conservative right wing Republican U.S. Senator Tom Coburn said he hasn't decided if he'll run for re-election in 2010.
Asked if the Republicans lost control of Congress because of Iraq, Katrina, Jack Abramoff or overspending? He answered that the Republicans were more interested in power and staying in control than doing what the American people needed them to do. (The same reason that State Senator Nancy Riley gave for leaving the GOP and becoming a Democrat last summer by changing her registration.)
On George Bush, Coburn said he's doing what he thinks is right, especially on Iraq. None of our options, there, in Iraq, are good, said Coburn. The president is "a terrible communicator behind the podium," Coburn said. --- you can say that again!
Regarding corruption in government, Coburn said transparency is the key to changing the political culture. He said he went to the Senate to change the culture of the Senate. (The American people believe changing the Senators is the key to changing the culure of corruption.) His campaign against earmarks is part of his campaign for transparency. He admitted frustration with the Senate but stopped short of saying whether or not he would quit the Senate.
On Iraq, Coburn said, "We made a mistake in foreign policy based on intelligence that was wrong....we're there...the question is whether we were manipulated..." (And the answer is, yes, now do something about it.)
From this morning's Flashpoint. . . .
Ultra conservative right wing Republican U.S. Senator Tom Coburn said he hasn't decided if he'll run for re-election in 2010.
Asked if the Republicans lost control of Congress because of Iraq, Katrina, Jack Abramoff or overspending? He answered that the Republicans were more interested in power and staying in control than doing what the American people needed them to do. (The same reason that State Senator Nancy Riley gave for leaving the GOP and becoming a Democrat last summer by changing her registration.)
On George Bush, Coburn said he's doing what he thinks is right, especially on Iraq. None of our options, there, in Iraq, are good, said Coburn. The president is "a terrible communicator behind the podium," Coburn said. --- you can say that again!
Regarding corruption in government, Coburn said transparency is the key to changing the political culture. He said he went to the Senate to change the culture of the Senate. (The American people believe changing the Senators is the key to changing the culure of corruption.) His campaign against earmarks is part of his campaign for transparency. He admitted frustration with the Senate but stopped short of saying whether or not he would quit the Senate.
On Iraq, Coburn said, "We made a mistake in foreign policy based on intelligence that was wrong....we're there...the question is whether we were manipulated..." (And the answer is, yes, now do something about it.)
Political Notebook
The Tulsa World's Political Notebook today discusses the State Party Chair races for both Democrats and Republicans. Read the story here.
Lt. Gov. Jari Askins
The National Lieutenant Governor's Association website is noting that Oklahoma Lt. Gov. Jari Askins is promoting economic
development and higher education funding. Their source is a recent Norman Transcript story about Askins' visit to the Norman Sooner Rotary Club last Tuesday morning. (Askins, left, is pictured at right with Sooner Rotary Club President Glenda Brown.)
The National Lieutenant Governor's Association website is noting that Oklahoma Lt. Gov. Jari Askins is promoting economic
development and higher education funding. Their source is a recent Norman Transcript story about Askins' visit to the Norman Sooner Rotary Club last Tuesday morning. (Askins, left, is pictured at right with Sooner Rotary Club President Glenda Brown.)
STIR things up, protect our water
If you're interested in protecting our water and ensuring that corporations use legal, responsible litter disposal practices then read this fact sheet on poultry litter to take action.
If you're interested in protecting our water and ensuring that corporations use legal, responsible litter disposal practices then read this fact sheet on poultry litter to take action.
The Greater Good
Oklahoma Attorney General Drew Edmondson (pictured at right) has repeatedly taken the position that his job is to protect the citizens and resources of our great state --- his position is a personal conviction and is inherent in his constitutional oath of office.
I am very pleased that his walk matches his talk and that he continues to pursue every option available to protect our water resources for the greater good of the people of Oklahoma.
I was incensed when a State Senate Committee this week passed a measure that declared that animal waste is not hazardous. (Thank you Senator Jim Wilson, D-Tahlequah, for voting no on the measure.) Let's hope SB 709 gets the boot in front of the full Senate.
Let's make sure that anyone who personally benefits from or directly represents the poultry producers does the right thing and abstains from this vote on the floor. (Read about SB 709 here. )
From accounts I've seen and heard of the debate, this measure was forwarded to protect big poultry companies and to provide them legal cover in disposal of massive amounts of chicken litter, particularly in eastern Oklahoma. This was a huge issue in the 2006 elections for Edmondson but the people determined that they prefer clean water and politicians who protect their water supply over those who pander to poultry producers.
We should be very wary when the fox approaches the henhouse and when politicians fail to uphold their constitutional duty to protect the people. Sen. Ron Justice, R-Chickasha, a former ag teacher, debated that this would protect farmers and ranchers from having to erect hazardous waste barriers around an accidentally misplaced cow patty from their stock trailers....hogwash. This was to protect our citizens and our water from further contamination. That is why AG Edmondson has sued, on behalf of the citizens of Oklahoma, 11 poultry companies, including Tyson, for their practice of using excess chicken litter as fertilizer which is polluting eastern Oklahoma watersheds.
(I have some personal experience raising chickens on the farm, we raised 200 Cornish Rock chicks annually and I can tell you that even that small number created a significant amount of litter. At the same time the water provided to us from the Rural Water District was not safe to drink for pregnant women or nursing mothers due to the high nitrate levels. And this was in western Oklahoma. The real underlying issue at hand, however, is the misuse of poultry litter from massive broiler operations in eastern Oklahoma. If done properly and under very strict guidelines the practice could be acceptable, but if it is not controlled and monitored properly the watershed will be contaminated beyond repair, if it isn't already.)
Thank you General Edmondson for doing the right thing for the greater good. Thank you, General Edmondson for insisting on accountability and responsibility from those who pollute our water and destroy our rivers.
Friday, February 23, 2007
OK County Democrats
I enjoyed being with the OK County Democrats at their regular Friday luncheon at the Boulevard Cafeteria today. Because most of those present are party regulars I see them often, but it was particularly nice today to speak with them about the progress made at the ODP since May 2005. If their enthusiasm for the upcoming precinct meetings and state convention is any indication we will have a great turnout of Democrats at every level in 2007 which will enable us to go from good to great in 2008.
I've asked them, on behalf of the State Convention Arrangements Committee, to consider hosting in their homes some of our out-of-town delegates to the State Convention. After all, we are the party that cares and shares. So, if you plan to attend the Convention in May and would like to take advantage of hosted accomodations please let us know and we'll try to put together something with the generous OK County Democrats.
I enjoyed being with the OK County Democrats at their regular Friday luncheon at the Boulevard Cafeteria today. Because most of those present are party regulars I see them often, but it was particularly nice today to speak with them about the progress made at the ODP since May 2005. If their enthusiasm for the upcoming precinct meetings and state convention is any indication we will have a great turnout of Democrats at every level in 2007 which will enable us to go from good to great in 2008.
I've asked them, on behalf of the State Convention Arrangements Committee, to consider hosting in their homes some of our out-of-town delegates to the State Convention. After all, we are the party that cares and shares. So, if you plan to attend the Convention in May and would like to take advantage of hosted accomodations please let us know and we'll try to put together something with the generous OK County Democrats.
Dodd is the ideal Un-Hillary
Connecticut Sen. Christopher J. Dodd, has a very respectable political background. He was the youngest person ever to be elected as a Connecticut Senator. He also is the only Connecticut Senator to be re-elected five times.
"Affable and Irish, Dodd comes closest of anyone in the field to the raw political talent of a JFK or Bill Clinton. Dodd, who turns 62 tomorrow, looks like a white-haired lion out of ``Advise and Consent,'' not a Ken doll of a hundred focus groups." Bloomberg.com
Just like all the other candidates, he started well behind Clinton in the money race, but he has since begun to catch up, his five million dollar campaign fund is surpassed by only Clinton herself. He states that he will not shy away from asking the Wall Street Companies for money, even though he heads up the Senate Banking Committee. But he says that accepting this money will not affect his policy decisions.
He is said to have one of the greatest advantages that you can have in politics, and that is he's a natural who doesn't need handlers to position him. Even though he has only been a candidate for a short time, he has made some big waves.
-Eric Davenport
Connecticut Sen. Christopher J. Dodd, has a very respectable political background. He was the youngest person ever to be elected as a Connecticut Senator. He also is the only Connecticut Senator to be re-elected five times.
"Affable and Irish, Dodd comes closest of anyone in the field to the raw political talent of a JFK or Bill Clinton. Dodd, who turns 62 tomorrow, looks like a white-haired lion out of ``Advise and Consent,'' not a Ken doll of a hundred focus groups." Bloomberg.com
Just like all the other candidates, he started well behind Clinton in the money race, but he has since begun to catch up, his five million dollar campaign fund is surpassed by only Clinton herself. He states that he will not shy away from asking the Wall Street Companies for money, even though he heads up the Senate Banking Committee. But he says that accepting this money will not affect his policy decisions.
He is said to have one of the greatest advantages that you can have in politics, and that is he's a natural who doesn't need handlers to position him. Even though he has only been a candidate for a short time, he has made some big waves.
-Eric Davenport
ODP Media Release
Minimum Wage Bill Stalled: Democrats Remain Committed to Issue and Oklahoma Families
Oklahoma Democrats remain committed to raising the minimum wage in Oklahoma, in spite of Republican heel-dragging and posturing this week at the State Capitol, where the minimum wage was tabled in committee.
Democratic Party Chairman Lisa Pryor said, "Democrats value the working men and women of our state and know that they deserve more. It is near impossible for a family to live on the current minimum wage. Oklahomans deserve more. As Democrats, we know protecting the interest and health of our community depends on families being able to provide the basic necessities of life."
She said the decision to table the minimum wage bill was disheartening, but Democrats are not giving up on the seeing the legislation through this session. The votes for minimum wage in committee just weren't there with Republicans poised to vote against it
"We are committed to building a better place to work and live not just for today's voters, but for future generations of Oklahomans," Pryor. "A minimum wage increase is a critical step in ensuring that future."
An average CEO earns more before lunchtime in one day than a minimum wager worker earns all year.
"We can make our economy fair by raising minimum wage," Pryor said. "There is overwhelming public support behind this because it is the right thing to do for Oklahomans. We are long over due to raise wages for our working families. Every day families work hard and play by the rules to earn a good living, but still they struggle. It is wrong to have thousands of families working full-time, year-round and still be living in poverty."
The Democratic-led U.S. House voted 315 to 116 to raise the federal minimum wage in January.
Oklahoma City, OK- Feb. 23, 2007
For Immediate Release
Contact: Jason McCarty, 405.427.3366
Minimum Wage Bill Stalled: Democrats Remain Committed to Issue and Oklahoma Families
Oklahoma Democrats remain committed to raising the minimum wage in Oklahoma, in spite of Republican heel-dragging and posturing this week at the State Capitol, where the minimum wage was tabled in committee.
Democratic Party Chairman Lisa Pryor said, "Democrats value the working men and women of our state and know that they deserve more. It is near impossible for a family to live on the current minimum wage. Oklahomans deserve more. As Democrats, we know protecting the interest and health of our community depends on families being able to provide the basic necessities of life."
She said the decision to table the minimum wage bill was disheartening, but Democrats are not giving up on the seeing the legislation through this session. The votes for minimum wage in committee just weren't there with Republicans poised to vote against it
"We are committed to building a better place to work and live not just for today's voters, but for future generations of Oklahomans," Pryor. "A minimum wage increase is a critical step in ensuring that future."
An average CEO earns more before lunchtime in one day than a minimum wager worker earns all year.
"We can make our economy fair by raising minimum wage," Pryor said. "There is overwhelming public support behind this because it is the right thing to do for Oklahomans. We are long over due to raise wages for our working families. Every day families work hard and play by the rules to earn a good living, but still they struggle. It is wrong to have thousands of families working full-time, year-round and still be living in poverty."
The Democratic-led U.S. House voted 315 to 116 to raise the federal minimum wage in January.
Oklahoma City, OK- Feb. 23, 2007
For Immediate Release
Contact: Jason McCarty, 405.427.3366
Richardson: 'I would have a cabinet department for Native American affairs'
Presidential candidate and current governor of New Mexico, Bill Richardson, has learned important lessons in dealing with Native Americans and Hispanic people in his state. He plans to use those valuable lessons if he’s elected president, by integrating the minorities into his cabinet and working to improve relations with American Indians across the country. Follow this link to read the Indian Country Today interview.
-Lacey Earls
Tom Vilsack drops out of race.
In the face of better recognized and funded competition, Tom Vilsack will be dropping his bid for the Democratic Party presidential nomination today. Vilsack will hold both a news conference and a teleconference today to further elaborate on his reasoning for dropping out of the race.
Vilsack was a strong critic of the war in Iraq, and has been calling for Congress to immediately cut all funding for the war.
- Jordan Endicott
In the face of better recognized and funded competition, Tom Vilsack will be dropping his bid for the Democratic Party presidential nomination today. Vilsack will hold both a news conference and a teleconference today to further elaborate on his reasoning for dropping out of the race.
Vilsack was a strong critic of the war in Iraq, and has been calling for Congress to immediately cut all funding for the war.
- Jordan Endicott
Steak Dinner Evidence of Pay to Play?
Republican House Speaker Lance Cargill's fundraising practices are again making headlines. Last year Cargill was the subject of a published investigative report in the Oklahoma Gazette about a "pay to play" scheme that he and then Speaker Todd Hiett had constructed and were implementing. (March 23, March 29, June 7, 2006) It wasn't the Democrats who first complained, but the lobbyists who were being strong armed by the GOP leadership to pay up or risk having the bills they are interested in tossed.
Cargill says "it's" not happening this year, that he's doing it right, that he's reformed, and to prove it he's introduced an eight-point lobbying reform package.
He then alleges that the Democrats are doing something wrong. His evidence? He was in a fancy OKC steakhouse a few days ago and saw five Democrats eating steaks together. This he said is evidence that their votes are for sale and that his is not. I think this is evidence that five Democrats were at dinner together and that Cargill is doing the "right", the partisan Republican, thing.
Recently he further defended his activities with this statement to the Associated Press: "Everybody out here asks lobbyists for money, there's nothing new about this.
"It wasn't a shakedown, holding people over a barrel on legislation. We're just being up front with people about the political goals that we have. That includes the 100 Ideas, that includes our legal fund."
Really now? Is this the same 100 Ideas initiative being promoted by ousted Republican legislator Thad Balkman? Did you catch that --- the political goals that WE have. And those would be the goals of the RNC, the OKGOP, and CHS.....
Further allegations of scandal dog the new speaker --- and where there's smoke, there could be fire, now if we could just find five Republicans eating together we'd have all the evidence needed.
Morning Coffee Rant
It's been reported that Sen. Glenn Coffee wrote an open letter to Gov. Brad Henry yesterday chastising him for not understanding the value and process of bi-partisanship and collaboration.
I couldn't believe my ears when I heard this. You send an open letter to the news media accusing Governor Henry of playing partisan politics, how hypocritical. But then you and your partisan political hack buddies at the capitol never let truth interfere with your hyperpartisan political attacks.
Our Governor has an 83% approval rating largely because his agenda priorities and leadership style reflect a strong commitment to bipartisanship and collaboration. His agenda and priorities reflect the will of Oklahoma's citizens --- stronger investments in education, healthcare, and research that will return to our state as higher paying jobs, healthier citizens and expanded opportunities for success --- regardless of political affiliation.
In fact, Henry has often demonstrated his forward vision for our state by saying "I'm building a state, not a party" and yet Coffee accuses the Governor of pure partisan politics. Back at 'ya Glenn. You are the one who has partisan press releases waiting for the "send" button before committee votes are even tallied. You are the one who is demanding lockstep allegiance to a failed partisan ideology ---- didn't you get the message, the Democrats took Congress and we are poised to take the White House in 2008. And Oklahoma Democrats are set to win secure majorities in the State House and State Senate in 2008. The fearmongering tricks and tomfoolery that worked for you and yours in 2004 and 2006 are out the door. Better not look left or right 'cause the Blue tsunami is coming to Oklahoma in 2008 and your appellation will be swept away with the debris.
Thursday, February 22, 2007
OK GOP shuts down access to behavioral health services for Oklahoma kids
Bill to Provide Greater Access to Behavioral Health Services Killed in Committee
State Sen. Debbe Leftwich said her measure to improve access to behavioral health care in Oklahoma is dead for two years after failing to receive passage from a Senate committee on Thursday. Leftwich said Senate Bill 452 would have closed a loophole that currently prevents thousands of Oklahomans from getting the treatment they need.
“Republicans in the Senate Retirement and Insurance Committee, two of which sell insurance in the private sector, lined up and voted in lockstep to protect their friends in the insurance industry while Oklahomans seeking treatment for serious illnesses have been shut out,” said Leftwich, D-Oklahoma City.
Leftwich said the problem is that the largest single insurance company in the state refuses to cover the cost of seeing health care providers such as licensed professional counselors, licensed marriage and family therapists, behavioral health professionals and advanced practice nurses. They will cover treatment by an M.D. psychiatrist or a PhD psychologist. However, those doctors are generally based in metropolitan areas.
“That means thousands of people in rural Oklahoma simply can’t get the help they need,” said Leftwich. “This bill would have guaranteed greater access for Oklahomans and families who need behavioral health services by ensuring that insurance companies follow the intent of the existing law. As it is now, insurance companies have found a loophole so big you could drive a truck through it.”
Leftwich said before killing the bill, there was a Republican attempt to amend the bill so that all patients needing behavioral treatment would have to first be seen by a doctor or psychologist. She said that would actually have cost insurance companies more money than her proposal, as those doctors tend to charge higher rates to see patients.
“This leaves countless Oklahomans between a rock and a hard place and unable to get the care they need,” Leftwich said. “Many people don’t have a choice about their insurance coverage if it’s provided through their job. Even those who can afford to pay for a psychiatrist or psychologist out-of-pocket may not live close enough to take advantage of those services. Oklahomans have been sold out in favor of the powerful insurance lobby.”
Chair's Note: Expect more of this type of behavior from the Rs this session, they are bound and determined to shut out working families and children. We warned voters of this kind of behavior last year and now it's coming to pass, Coffee and his crew care less about doing the right thing than they do about the next elections.
Bill to Provide Greater Access to Behavioral Health Services Killed in Committee
State Sen. Debbe Leftwich said her measure to improve access to behavioral health care in Oklahoma is dead for two years after failing to receive passage from a Senate committee on Thursday. Leftwich said Senate Bill 452 would have closed a loophole that currently prevents thousands of Oklahomans from getting the treatment they need.
“Republicans in the Senate Retirement and Insurance Committee, two of which sell insurance in the private sector, lined up and voted in lockstep to protect their friends in the insurance industry while Oklahomans seeking treatment for serious illnesses have been shut out,” said Leftwich, D-Oklahoma City.
Leftwich said the problem is that the largest single insurance company in the state refuses to cover the cost of seeing health care providers such as licensed professional counselors, licensed marriage and family therapists, behavioral health professionals and advanced practice nurses. They will cover treatment by an M.D. psychiatrist or a PhD psychologist. However, those doctors are generally based in metropolitan areas.
“That means thousands of people in rural Oklahoma simply can’t get the help they need,” said Leftwich. “This bill would have guaranteed greater access for Oklahomans and families who need behavioral health services by ensuring that insurance companies follow the intent of the existing law. As it is now, insurance companies have found a loophole so big you could drive a truck through it.”
Leftwich said before killing the bill, there was a Republican attempt to amend the bill so that all patients needing behavioral treatment would have to first be seen by a doctor or psychologist. She said that would actually have cost insurance companies more money than her proposal, as those doctors tend to charge higher rates to see patients.
“This leaves countless Oklahomans between a rock and a hard place and unable to get the care they need,” Leftwich said. “Many people don’t have a choice about their insurance coverage if it’s provided through their job. Even those who can afford to pay for a psychiatrist or psychologist out-of-pocket may not live close enough to take advantage of those services. Oklahomans have been sold out in favor of the powerful insurance lobby.”
Chair's Note: Expect more of this type of behavior from the Rs this session, they are bound and determined to shut out working families and children. We warned voters of this kind of behavior last year and now it's coming to pass, Coffee and his crew care less about doing the right thing than they do about the next elections.
State Convention 2007
If you have questions about the ODP State Convention 2007 please send us an email at stateconvention2007@okdemocrats.org.
Early registration and credentialing will be Friday, May 18th with our first general session on Saturday, May 19th and the second general session on Sunday, May 20th. All meetings are in OKC.
On HBO Tonight
Ghosts of Abu Ghraib
Moxie Firecracker Films is proud to announce
the world broadcast premiere of Rory Kennedy's
GHOSTS OF ABU GHRAIB
Thursday, February 22nd at 9:30 p.m. (EST) on HBO.
Through interviews with perpetrators, victims and witnesses,
Ghosts of Abu Ghraib examines the abuses that occurred
in the fall of 2003 at the notorious Iraqi prison.
"[A] powerful and indispensable documentary." -The Hollywood Reporter
"[This] forceful, direct doc is well-turned in all departments." -Variety
"A controlled, candid and remarkably thorough look at all sides of what happened..." -L.A. Times
"Haunting" -IndieWire
Would someone please tape this for me? I don't get HBO at home. Thanks!
Biden Relies on Experience
After Senator Joe Biden’s recent remarks concerning Barack Obama it left many wondering if he still had a chance in the 2008 Presidential race. At the AFSCME Democratic Presidential Forum in Carson City, Nevada Biden made strides to improve his Presidential image. One spectator was left saying "Biden, I was surprised. He came across very presidential." As Biden continues to repair his image one thing is certain his strong point remains the issues. Though Biden has not caught up with frontrunners Clinton, Obama, and Edwards, he has continued to impress on issues close to Americans such as education and health care, but many feel it is his strong stance on Iraq and experience on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that may keep him in the race. For more on this click here or visit Joe Biden's website for more crowd reaction to his Nevada speech.
-Cole Hines
OKC Gazette: The executive director of 100 Ideas now pledges to reveal the state initiative’s funders
Ben Fenwick of the OKC Gazette filed a great story on the 100 Ideas project of Lance Cargill and Thad Balkman.
Here's a critical passage:
"The 100 Ideas organization previously refused to answer questions about such funding. In two previous Gazette stories, both Cargill and Balkman cited donor privacy as reasons for not revealing the organization’s financials. Several news organizations requested the names of the group’s financiers.
Two Democrats were added approximately an hour after the Gazette interviewed Balkman about the political disparity in the group, and days after Balkman had announced the makeup of the then-12-member board. It is now at 14, with a 2-to-1 Republican disparity, counting known registrations.
The advisory board additions also came after state Democratic Party Chair Lisa Pryor issued a scathing statement regarding the 100 Ideas board picks.
Pryor said the 100 Ideas initiative appears to be compromised by the ideology of its originators, who will choose only ideas that fit their party’s agenda.
“What will happen is it will raise false hopes with the public, and they will play into the Republican strategy,” Pryor said."
Wes Clark Continues to Disapprove Iran Invasion
StopIranWar.com launched just yesterday, however, already over 11,000 people have signed their names to the petition. This goes to show that no matter how the press tries to spin information to favor Bush's intentions in Iran, the general public is not taking it anymore.
Today, a report was released stating that Iran has breached an agreement with the United Nations through expanding its efforts to enrich Uranium - an important element in the creation of nuclear energy. These efforts at nuclear energy creation have caused a stir in Washington, as relations with Iran are already compromised by the paranoia surrounding Iran's alleged military gifts to Iraq. While the Bush administration sees a direct relationship between the creation of nuclear energy and gifts to Iraq, it is important to get all the facts before jumping to conclusions.
The fact of the matter is that although the report shows an increase in the amount of Uranium Iranians are enriching, the numbers are actually far below the projected nuclear activity Iran publicly stated a year ago. Moreover, while nuclear energy has the stigma of being highly dangerous and inevitably linked to terrorist activity, quite the opposite is true. In today's world of limited resources, energy production has become a multi-alternative business. From wind and solar power to hydroelectric dams, energy must be produced for human consumption. This fact is unavoidable. What IS avoidable is war with Iran.
At this point, the Bush administration is publicly stating that they hope to use diplomatic means to solve the current situation... but then again isn't that what they said about Iraq? By placing more stringent sanctions on Iran, Bush is in essence limiting the ability of Iranians to create and use electricity, which just isn't our business. It's time for Bush to stop interfering with nations attempting to better themselves, and halt his crusade through the Middle East.
So, here's to hoping that limited information and the President's use of fear tactics will not lead to another Iraq-type situation. At this point in time, we are simply not needed, nor welcome in Iran.
-Nicole Morgan
Click to read the New York Times article.
Click to add your name to the StopIranWar.com petition
After reading Mike Dorning's article about Obama's website, I decided to check it out and if you haven't visited the website yet, you should check it out as well. It is, hands down the most interactive website that any candidate has to offer. Much like other social networking websites such as myspace and facebook, Obama's website allows visitors to create an accout, add a picture, search and add friends, join groups and even create a personal blog. The website also allows you to search for upcoming events in your area. In addition to the social networking features, Obama provides biographical information as well as his stand on various issues. To check out Obama's webite, go to www.my.barackobama.com or to read Mike Dorning's article, click here.
-Whitney Denton
Letter to Norman Transcript Editor
ODP Vice-Chair Ben Odom Sent this letter to the Norman Transcript last week after the paper took a shot at Democratic Congressman Dan Boren and his position against the Bush Administration's Iraq plan.
Dear Editor,
It is a sad day for Norman when our local paper, The Transcript, allows its editorial page cartoon and lead editorial to sink to the level of right-wing talk radio and totally distort the Democratic positions on the war in Iraq and the war on terror.
Not blindly following the failed leadership of George Bush is doing our troops a favor, not a disservice. What really gives aid and comfort to our enemy is knowing that the Administration is without competence, a real plan for a victory in the region, or the ability to persuade allies to meaningfully contribute. Congressman Dan Boren, who is a pro-defense Democrat on the Armed Services Committee, ought to be saluted for his constant efforts to equip our troops, and modernize our defenses. When he points out that the lives of our troops are not just poker chips to be thrown in the pot in an attempt to bluff out a bad hand, Dan Boren ought to receive the praise of this newspaper and its readers, not unwarranted and ill-informed criticism.
Even worse than the editorial was the cartoon of February 12, showing Democrats putting up a flag of surrender. What a horrible distortion of the truth, when Democrats have voted for hundreds of billions in defense spending, backed the war in Afghanistan and the hunting down of Osama bin Laden. Democrats have indeed pointed out that the Iraq war has been poorly conceived and led by this White House, but that is our patriotic duty as the “watchdog” opposition. To suggest that Democrats favor anything but victory in the war on terror however is McCarthyism, and tears at the very fabric of our political system.
All Americans want victory – but how we can best achieve that victory is a proper topic for debate in our system of government. That type of debate has always occurred in past conflicts. It speaks to the very reason we have the best system of government ever devised. But a republic merits honest discussion, not bumper sticker politics.
Democrats, Oklahomans, and Americans deserve better than this level of discourse from your editorial page. Shame at what your editorials have insinuated against your fellow Americans should be your constant companion as the debate unfolds.
Sincerely,
Ben Odom
ODP Vice-Chair Ben Odom Sent this letter to the Norman Transcript last week after the paper took a shot at Democratic Congressman Dan Boren and his position against the Bush Administration's Iraq plan.
Dear Editor,
It is a sad day for Norman when our local paper, The Transcript, allows its editorial page cartoon and lead editorial to sink to the level of right-wing talk radio and totally distort the Democratic positions on the war in Iraq and the war on terror.
Not blindly following the failed leadership of George Bush is doing our troops a favor, not a disservice. What really gives aid and comfort to our enemy is knowing that the Administration is without competence, a real plan for a victory in the region, or the ability to persuade allies to meaningfully contribute. Congressman Dan Boren, who is a pro-defense Democrat on the Armed Services Committee, ought to be saluted for his constant efforts to equip our troops, and modernize our defenses. When he points out that the lives of our troops are not just poker chips to be thrown in the pot in an attempt to bluff out a bad hand, Dan Boren ought to receive the praise of this newspaper and its readers, not unwarranted and ill-informed criticism.
Even worse than the editorial was the cartoon of February 12, showing Democrats putting up a flag of surrender. What a horrible distortion of the truth, when Democrats have voted for hundreds of billions in defense spending, backed the war in Afghanistan and the hunting down of Osama bin Laden. Democrats have indeed pointed out that the Iraq war has been poorly conceived and led by this White House, but that is our patriotic duty as the “watchdog” opposition. To suggest that Democrats favor anything but victory in the war on terror however is McCarthyism, and tears at the very fabric of our political system.
All Americans want victory – but how we can best achieve that victory is a proper topic for debate in our system of government. That type of debate has always occurred in past conflicts. It speaks to the very reason we have the best system of government ever devised. But a republic merits honest discussion, not bumper sticker politics.
Democrats, Oklahomans, and Americans deserve better than this level of discourse from your editorial page. Shame at what your editorials have insinuated against your fellow Americans should be your constant companion as the debate unfolds.
Sincerely,
Ben Odom
ODP Media Release
Pryor: Cargill Peddles Reform Pill, But Will He Take It?
Oklahoma City, OK- Feb. 21, 2007 - Republican House Speaker Lance Cargill is peddling a House Bill on Ethics and Lobbying Reform. But is the Speaker willing to take his own medicine?
Oklahoma Democratic Party Chairman Lisa Pryor said today it's interesting that the politician many people believe did the most skirting of the ethics rules in the last cycle has suddenly become the chief reformer. She challenged the Harrah Republican to come clean.
"If Lance Cargill is suddenly the champion of transparency in government, he should make the names of his 100 Ideas Initiative financial supporters public," Pryor said. "It looks like the fox wants to close the gate now that he is in the henhouse. If Lance Cargill wants to reform the way donations are made and lobbying is done at the State Capitol Building, he should lead by example."
She said voters should question why Cargill raised and spent so much money for a House race he won with ease. Pryor also said that until lobbyists at the Capitol are not strong-armed to donate to Republican leadership PACS just to get legislation heard, the whole bill is hollow pandering.
Pryor said Oklahoma House Democrats tomorrow are expected to offer amendments to the House Bill which will offer will solutions to open government.
Feb. 21, 2007
Oklahoma Democratic Party
Jason McCarty, Communications Director
405.427.3366
jasonmccarty@okdemocrats.org
Pryor: Cargill Peddles Reform Pill, But Will He Take It?
Oklahoma City, OK- Feb. 21, 2007 - Republican House Speaker Lance Cargill is peddling a House Bill on Ethics and Lobbying Reform. But is the Speaker willing to take his own medicine?
Oklahoma Democratic Party Chairman Lisa Pryor said today it's interesting that the politician many people believe did the most skirting of the ethics rules in the last cycle has suddenly become the chief reformer. She challenged the Harrah Republican to come clean.
"If Lance Cargill is suddenly the champion of transparency in government, he should make the names of his 100 Ideas Initiative financial supporters public," Pryor said. "It looks like the fox wants to close the gate now that he is in the henhouse. If Lance Cargill wants to reform the way donations are made and lobbying is done at the State Capitol Building, he should lead by example."
She said voters should question why Cargill raised and spent so much money for a House race he won with ease. Pryor also said that until lobbyists at the Capitol are not strong-armed to donate to Republican leadership PACS just to get legislation heard, the whole bill is hollow pandering.
Pryor said Oklahoma House Democrats tomorrow are expected to offer amendments to the House Bill which will offer will solutions to open government.
Feb. 21, 2007
Oklahoma Democratic Party
Jason McCarty, Communications Director
405.427.3366
jasonmccarty@okdemocrats.org
Online Activists Push Course Change in Iraq
(Chair's Note: This story from the Christian Science Monitor was forwarded to me by one of our OK Blue Notes readers and online activists. It's worth reading and considering how bloggers may change politics in America and in Oklahoma.)
http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0222/p03s03-usfp.html
States Begin Criticizing Iraq Policy, Too
Spurred by online activists, five state legislatures moved last week to oppose Bush's war strategy.
By Cristian Lupsa
The Vermont legislature wants Congress to bring American troops home from Iraq. The Iowa Senate is on record against President Bush's plan to send more troops into combat there. Democratic legislators in Maine sent a letter to their congressional delegation asking them to vote against any kind of escalation of the war. Even the Boston City Council weighed in to ask for a withdrawal of troops from both Iraq and Afghanistan.
These are among some two dozen resolutions criticizing the Iraq war and the president's strategy for a troop "surge." Although state and local pronouncements on foreign policy carry little weight – even less than the nonbinding resolution that cleared the US House of Representatives Friday – they illustrate the war's unpopularity among elected officials at all levels. They also show how activists are using the Internet to tap that discontent.
The current push at the state level was spurred largely by a mid-January initiative by liberal advocacy groups, including the Progressive States Network and MoveOn.org, with support from US Sen. Edward Kennedy (D) of Massachusetts. Launched as Congress wrangled over whether to debate Mr. Bush's new Iraq strategy, the online campaign urged war critics to bombard their local as well as national elected representatives with calls for action.
"The Internet is making the 50-state campaigns easier and cheaper," says Christopher Cooper, a political scientist at Western Carolina University in Cullowhee, N.C. "This has led to an increasing nationalization of state politics."
Nearly half the states weigh war criticism
More than 20 states are working on resolutions or letters that oppose the "surge" plan or ask for the withdrawal of troops from Iraq.
In Vermont, the resolution approved by both chambers last week calls on the "president and Congress to commence immediately the orderly withdrawal of American military forces from Iraq." State Rep. Michael Fisher, the Democrat who introduced the measure for the second consecutive year, said the language of the resolution debated in Washington was not strong enough.
"I felt Vermonters wanted a stronger message than 'Don't escalate,' " he says. Mr. Fisher says he doesn't know what the impact of the resolution will be, but hopes that state lawmakers around the country will recognize the Iraq war as a states' issue, because it drains funding for local projects, adds to the burden on taxpayers, and puts a strain on the National Guard.
"This act might create a little ripple, or it might be part of a larger wave," Fisher says.
The current campaign won't relent until it stops any escalation of the war, says Joel Barkin, executive director of the Progressive States Network. "States are the ones that ultimately have to deal with the repercussions."
Aside from Vermont, resolutions passed last week in the California and Iowa senates, while state lawmakers in Maine and Maryland opted to send letters voicing opposition to the troop buildup to their congressional delegates. US Rep. Tom Allen (D) of Maine praised his state's legislators for listening to their constituents, while Maine's Republican lawmakers said they were pleased their Democratic colleagues didn't take the issue to the floor.
"State legislatures are the representative bodies that are closest to the people, and they have been hearing from constituents who are frustrated with the war," says Aubrey Jewett, a political scientist at the University of Central Florida in Orlando, in an e-mail. "As more state legislatures take up resolutions on Iraq, it will add to the mounting pressure for the president and Congress to change strategies."
Votes and debates in state legislatures break along party lines, with Republicans saying lawmakers should not waste energy on actions that carry little weight. They also contend that these types of resolutions send the wrong message to US troops. But their clout has waned since last fall's elections, when the GOP lost majorities in five state legislatures. They now control 15 legislatures to the Democrats' 23.
While the politics remain contentious, the technological take-away is simpler: Online activism is pushing national issues to the states.
"The Internet helps decentralize political activism," says John Horrigan of the Pew Internet & American Life Project. "You no longer have to organize a protest in Washington, D.C." to get your point across.
Online, activists gain more visibility
The growth in Internet-based grass-roots groups doesn't mean more activists are out there, but it does mean people have found a faster way to reach large number of supporters, Mr. Horrigan says. So far, liberal Democrats have the edge. A Pew study has shown them to be the most likely online activists. "At least [for] now, the Internet is a space where Democrats are slightly busier with online tools," he adds.
In the case of the Iraq resolutions in the states, activism helped give a national debate some local flavor, Mr. Barkin says. The aim remains to make Washington pay attention, but the means of doing so are changing.
"You put in 500 calls to a [legislator in Washington] and you will send a message," says Barkin. "But you put 500 calls to a state legislator and it shakes the whole building."
(Chair's Note: This story from the Christian Science Monitor was forwarded to me by one of our OK Blue Notes readers and online activists. It's worth reading and considering how bloggers may change politics in America and in Oklahoma.)
http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0222/p03s03-usfp.html
States Begin Criticizing Iraq Policy, Too
Spurred by online activists, five state legislatures moved last week to oppose Bush's war strategy.
By Cristian Lupsa
The Vermont legislature wants Congress to bring American troops home from Iraq. The Iowa Senate is on record against President Bush's plan to send more troops into combat there. Democratic legislators in Maine sent a letter to their congressional delegation asking them to vote against any kind of escalation of the war. Even the Boston City Council weighed in to ask for a withdrawal of troops from both Iraq and Afghanistan.
These are among some two dozen resolutions criticizing the Iraq war and the president's strategy for a troop "surge." Although state and local pronouncements on foreign policy carry little weight – even less than the nonbinding resolution that cleared the US House of Representatives Friday – they illustrate the war's unpopularity among elected officials at all levels. They also show how activists are using the Internet to tap that discontent.
The current push at the state level was spurred largely by a mid-January initiative by liberal advocacy groups, including the Progressive States Network and MoveOn.org, with support from US Sen. Edward Kennedy (D) of Massachusetts. Launched as Congress wrangled over whether to debate Mr. Bush's new Iraq strategy, the online campaign urged war critics to bombard their local as well as national elected representatives with calls for action.
"The Internet is making the 50-state campaigns easier and cheaper," says Christopher Cooper, a political scientist at Western Carolina University in Cullowhee, N.C. "This has led to an increasing nationalization of state politics."
Nearly half the states weigh war criticism
More than 20 states are working on resolutions or letters that oppose the "surge" plan or ask for the withdrawal of troops from Iraq.
In Vermont, the resolution approved by both chambers last week calls on the "president and Congress to commence immediately the orderly withdrawal of American military forces from Iraq." State Rep. Michael Fisher, the Democrat who introduced the measure for the second consecutive year, said the language of the resolution debated in Washington was not strong enough.
"I felt Vermonters wanted a stronger message than 'Don't escalate,' " he says. Mr. Fisher says he doesn't know what the impact of the resolution will be, but hopes that state lawmakers around the country will recognize the Iraq war as a states' issue, because it drains funding for local projects, adds to the burden on taxpayers, and puts a strain on the National Guard.
"This act might create a little ripple, or it might be part of a larger wave," Fisher says.
The current campaign won't relent until it stops any escalation of the war, says Joel Barkin, executive director of the Progressive States Network. "States are the ones that ultimately have to deal with the repercussions."
Aside from Vermont, resolutions passed last week in the California and Iowa senates, while state lawmakers in Maine and Maryland opted to send letters voicing opposition to the troop buildup to their congressional delegates. US Rep. Tom Allen (D) of Maine praised his state's legislators for listening to their constituents, while Maine's Republican lawmakers said they were pleased their Democratic colleagues didn't take the issue to the floor.
"State legislatures are the representative bodies that are closest to the people, and they have been hearing from constituents who are frustrated with the war," says Aubrey Jewett, a political scientist at the University of Central Florida in Orlando, in an e-mail. "As more state legislatures take up resolutions on Iraq, it will add to the mounting pressure for the president and Congress to change strategies."
Votes and debates in state legislatures break along party lines, with Republicans saying lawmakers should not waste energy on actions that carry little weight. They also contend that these types of resolutions send the wrong message to US troops. But their clout has waned since last fall's elections, when the GOP lost majorities in five state legislatures. They now control 15 legislatures to the Democrats' 23.
While the politics remain contentious, the technological take-away is simpler: Online activism is pushing national issues to the states.
"The Internet helps decentralize political activism," says John Horrigan of the Pew Internet & American Life Project. "You no longer have to organize a protest in Washington, D.C." to get your point across.
Online, activists gain more visibility
The growth in Internet-based grass-roots groups doesn't mean more activists are out there, but it does mean people have found a faster way to reach large number of supporters, Mr. Horrigan says. So far, liberal Democrats have the edge. A Pew study has shown them to be the most likely online activists. "At least [for] now, the Internet is a space where Democrats are slightly busier with online tools," he adds.
In the case of the Iraq resolutions in the states, activism helped give a national debate some local flavor, Mr. Barkin says. The aim remains to make Washington pay attention, but the means of doing so are changing.
"You put in 500 calls to a [legislator in Washington] and you will send a message," says Barkin. "But you put 500 calls to a state legislator and it shakes the whole building."
Progressive Revival
Elaine Dodd, former Tulsa County Democratic Party Chair, sent a reminder today of the Just Progress Progressive Revival set for 2 p.m. Saturday at Fellowship Congregationa Churs, 25th and Harvard in Tulsa. The retreat will be preceded by a memorial service for activist Keith Smith at 1 p.m. For more information about Just Progress visit their website at http://www.justprogress.org/.
Oklahoma
Voting Against Bipartisan Resolutions
By voting against the resolutions these Oklahoma Republicans have opted to ignore the lessons of history, the advice of military experts and the recommendations of the bipartisan Iraq Study Group. Additionally, a recent report shows that troops are facing equipment shortages with a lack of armored vehicles, weapons and other equipment. These shortages continue to hamper efforts in
"This past week, our representatives in Congress had an opportunity to represent the interests of
"Our troops continue to be stretched thin and are still lacking much needed equipment. Oklahomans and our brave men and women deserve a new strategy, and a new direction not more obstruction by Republicans like Senators Tom Coburn and Jim Inhofe and Representatives Mary Fallin, Frank Lucas, John Sullivan and Tom Cole who are clinging to a failed stay the course strategy. The President's plan to continue to escalate the war in
Jason McCarty, Communications Director
jasonmccarty@okdemocrats.org
405.427.3366
ODP Media Release:
OK Democratic Party Chair Announces Delegate Selection and Affirmative Action Committee for 2008 National Convention
Oklahoma Democratic Party Chair Lisa Pryor today announced the appointment of 47 Democratic leaders to serve on the Party's Delegate Selection and Affirmative Action Committee.
The committee will develop a plan for determining the process for selecting delegates and alternates to the August 2008 Democratic National Convention in Denver. The plan will detail procedures involving delegate candidate recruitment and delegate selection as well as a timeline for the delegate selection process.
The plan must be submitted to the Democratic National Committee's Rules and Bylaws Committee by May 1, 2007 after a 30-day comment period.
"I'm excited to announce this committee," Pryor said. "They will monitor the process for delegate selection and help lay the groundwork for Oklahoma delegates to go to Denver and participate in history by nominating the next President of the United States."
Teresa Hill, DNC Outreach Coordinator, will chair the committee.
Committee members include:
Diane Anderson, Sue Barton, Representative Scott BigHorse, Edna Brookfield, Lillie Buckner, Philip Busey Jr., Jason Campbell, Cara Cowan-Watts, Cissie Crusoe, Louise Darrington, Carl Downing, Senator Judy Eason-McIntyre, Lois Felder, Kalyn Free, Chris Gentges, Todd Goodman, Danny Goodwin, Margo Gray, Alan Harder, Matt Harney, Earl Hatley, Marcus Hayes, Krista Hodges-Eckhoff, Representative Chuck Hoskin, Dana Jim, Sue Johnson, Ed Kerns, Sebastian Lantos, Representative Al McAffrey, Earl Mitchell, Bernice Mitchell, Allen Moss, James Nimmo, Karen Parsons, Representative Anasatasia Pittman, John Reed, Wilfredo Rivera, Ed Romo, Representative Jabar Shumate, Brant Solomon, Senator John Sparks, Juanita Sykes-Vasquez, Jacquelyn Thomas, George Tiger, David Wilson, and Angela Wilson.
Oklahoma City, OK - Feb. 21, 2007
Jason McCarty,Communications Director
405.427.3366
jasonmccarty@okdemocrats.org
OK Democratic Party Chair Announces Delegate Selection and Affirmative Action Committee for 2008 National Convention
Oklahoma Democratic Party Chair Lisa Pryor today announced the appointment of 47 Democratic leaders to serve on the Party's Delegate Selection and Affirmative Action Committee.
The committee will develop a plan for determining the process for selecting delegates and alternates to the August 2008 Democratic National Convention in Denver. The plan will detail procedures involving delegate candidate recruitment and delegate selection as well as a timeline for the delegate selection process.
The plan must be submitted to the Democratic National Committee's Rules and Bylaws Committee by May 1, 2007 after a 30-day comment period.
"I'm excited to announce this committee," Pryor said. "They will monitor the process for delegate selection and help lay the groundwork for Oklahoma delegates to go to Denver and participate in history by nominating the next President of the United States."
Teresa Hill, DNC Outreach Coordinator, will chair the committee.
Committee members include:
Diane Anderson, Sue Barton, Representative Scott BigHorse, Edna Brookfield, Lillie Buckner, Philip Busey Jr., Jason Campbell, Cara Cowan-Watts, Cissie Crusoe, Louise Darrington, Carl Downing, Senator Judy Eason-McIntyre, Lois Felder, Kalyn Free, Chris Gentges, Todd Goodman, Danny Goodwin, Margo Gray, Alan Harder, Matt Harney, Earl Hatley, Marcus Hayes, Krista Hodges-Eckhoff, Representative Chuck Hoskin, Dana Jim, Sue Johnson, Ed Kerns, Sebastian Lantos, Representative Al McAffrey, Earl Mitchell, Bernice Mitchell, Allen Moss, James Nimmo, Karen Parsons, Representative Anasatasia Pittman, John Reed, Wilfredo Rivera, Ed Romo, Representative Jabar Shumate, Brant Solomon, Senator John Sparks, Juanita Sykes-Vasquez, Jacquelyn Thomas, George Tiger, David Wilson, and Angela Wilson.
Oklahoma City, OK - Feb. 21, 2007
Jason McCarty,Communications Director
405.427.3366
jasonmccarty@okdemocrats.org
Cautionary Words to Live By
(Chairman's Note: Oklahoma County Democratic Party Secretary Lynn Green emailed this inspiring call to participation and I thought it worthy of sharing with our OK Blue Notes readers. Thanks, Lynn, my sentiments exactly. As a personal note, I will not be endorsing or opposing any of our good Democrats who take up the call of party service this spring. Best of luck to each and every one of you from the precinct, to county, to district, and to state office candidates. Read Lynn's words below:)
We are about to enter a time of "Intra-party" politics. In other words, we are deciding who will lead us during the crucial election we face in 2008. We will be asked to make many decisions and have in front of us many choices, few of them easy. No where in our society, except perhaps in sports, is it more impossible to create "win-win" situations than in politics. Elections mean someone wins and someone loses, if there are at least two people who want the same position. The fact that these elections pit Democrat against Democrat means that we will have friends, colleagues, even allies asking, often demanding our vote.
Yet we recognize that we need a united party in order to succeed, so what do we do? We remember, first and foremost why we are Democrats. We have all seen the slogan posted on various signs and bumper stickers: "Democrats Care." I wish I could amend that to read "Democrats Care: About More than Number 1". Probably wouldn't make for good advertising, but to my mind that's why I'm a Democrat. I want a world where we truly realize "justice for ALL." And if my political ideals go beyond individual comforts, then my political committment must go further than my personal ambition.
Personal ambition is good and necessary if we are to have a vital party. I am running for an office in my county because I truly believe I can do it better than those who are also running for the office. (We will see what the delegates have to say.) But I do not believe that winning the election is a personal endorsement or losing it a personal rejection. It is an opportunity for service, a means to advance the cause of justice.
So if my Democratic friend decides to support me, great; I hope a majority of them do so. But if not, she is still my Democratic friend, and we will work together for this party we love. For me to feel rejected or, worse, to drop out of active participation in my party would make a lie of everything I feel makes me a Democrat.
I wish you the best of fortune as you help to guide your portion of the party through this often difficult time. May we recognize that we Democrats care about more than 1 in regards to our party as well as our country.
Lynn Green
OK County Secretary
(Chairman's Note: Oklahoma County Democratic Party Secretary Lynn Green emailed this inspiring call to participation and I thought it worthy of sharing with our OK Blue Notes readers. Thanks, Lynn, my sentiments exactly. As a personal note, I will not be endorsing or opposing any of our good Democrats who take up the call of party service this spring. Best of luck to each and every one of you from the precinct, to county, to district, and to state office candidates. Read Lynn's words below:)
We are about to enter a time of "Intra-party" politics. In other words, we are deciding who will lead us during the crucial election we face in 2008. We will be asked to make many decisions and have in front of us many choices, few of them easy. No where in our society, except perhaps in sports, is it more impossible to create "win-win" situations than in politics. Elections mean someone wins and someone loses, if there are at least two people who want the same position. The fact that these elections pit Democrat against Democrat means that we will have friends, colleagues, even allies asking, often demanding our vote.
Yet we recognize that we need a united party in order to succeed, so what do we do? We remember, first and foremost why we are Democrats. We have all seen the slogan posted on various signs and bumper stickers: "Democrats Care." I wish I could amend that to read "Democrats Care: About More than Number 1". Probably wouldn't make for good advertising, but to my mind that's why I'm a Democrat. I want a world where we truly realize "justice for ALL." And if my political ideals go beyond individual comforts, then my political committment must go further than my personal ambition.
Personal ambition is good and necessary if we are to have a vital party. I am running for an office in my county because I truly believe I can do it better than those who are also running for the office. (We will see what the delegates have to say.) But I do not believe that winning the election is a personal endorsement or losing it a personal rejection. It is an opportunity for service, a means to advance the cause of justice.
So if my Democratic friend decides to support me, great; I hope a majority of them do so. But if not, she is still my Democratic friend, and we will work together for this party we love. For me to feel rejected or, worse, to drop out of active participation in my party would make a lie of everything I feel makes me a Democrat.
I wish you the best of fortune as you help to guide your portion of the party through this often difficult time. May we recognize that we Democrats care about more than 1 in regards to our party as well as our country.
Lynn Green
OK County Secretary
Morning Coffee Rant
Yesterday all eight GOP members of the Senate Appropriations Committee voted against Oklahoma's families and three-year olds specifically when they killed a measure to consider a pilot program that was to be a public private partnership promoted by Gov. Brad Henry and many early childhood advocates in Oklahoma. All eight Democrats voted for the measure in keeping with our priorities to expand education opportunities and develop strong public private partnerships for the benefit of the public.
Sen. Glenn Coffee quickly sent out a press release indicating that his senators have nothing against 3-year olds but believed it was a program that was just too expensive; thus his senators killed the measure for the remainder of the 51st Legislature and for all 3-year olds.
He further said that the votes should not be considered an end to bi-partisanship in the State Senate. (He got that right, something has to begin before it can end and from all appearances neither the Greedy Old Party, nor Senator Coffee, have dealt in good faith with the Senate Democrats or the citizens of Oklahoma --- bipartisanship has yet to begin. Anyone who thinks that this 24-24 situation is a path to bipartisan common ground is wrong. And by the way, shouldn't it really be a 25-24 thing with the real President of the Senate being a Democrat? Let's get the issues on the floor of the Senate and debate the merits of the bills then vote on them there.)
Read more about it at www.okinsider.com by clicking here and another version at the OK here.
Go West Democratic Candidates, Go West
A story in this morning's WaPo about a Democratic presidential candidate forum in Nevada brings home the growing importance of winning in the West, it also highlights the growing discord between Obama and Clinton. Here at OK Blue Notes we have assigned each of our ODP interns to track and write about one of the presidential candidates. Their postings will reflect their work. In the meantime, the rest of us here at the ODP will post items we find of interest to our Oklahoma readers about national, state, and local politics. A posting does not imply endorsement for any candidate for office at any level.
Read about the West and the Clinton Obama feud below.
Clinton, Obama Camps' Feud Is Out in the Open
By Chris Cillizza and Dan Balz
Washington Post Staff Writers
Thursday, February 22, 2007; A01
An increasingly acrimonious competition between Sens. Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton to enlist the Democratic Party's leading fundraisers and operatives burst into the open yesterday, overshadowing what was billed as the presidential campaign's first gathering of candidates in Nevada.
While Clinton (N.Y.) and Obama (Ill.) have not for the most part taken their competition public, their campaigns in recent weeks have been trumpeting each victory, such as the recruitment of a major Boston-based rainmaker by Obama and a prominent African American state senator from South Carolina by Clinton.
The back-and-forth between the two campaigns has largely been fodder for political insiders. Yesterday, however, David Geffen, the music and film producer who is one of the party's most prominent donors, made the fight more public. In an interview with New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd, Geffen said that Clinton is "the easiest to beat" of the Democratic field and skewered her unwillingness to apologize for her 2002 vote to use force in Iraq. "It's not a very big thing to say 'I made a mistake' on the war, and typical of Hillary Clinton that she can't," Geffen said.
Geffen, who was a co-host of an Obama fundraiser Tuesday night in Los Angeles, saved even sharper criticism for former president Bill Clinton, to whom he was close before a falling-out over the pardoning of financier Marc Rich at the end of Clinton's second term. "I don't think anybody believes that in the last six years, all of a sudden Bill Clinton has become a different person," Geffen said in an oblique reference to questions surrounding the former president's private life.
After seeing the comments yesterday morning, the Clinton campaign immediately issued a call for Obama to disavow Geffen's remarks and return his $2,300 donation, arguing that they were contrary to Obama's pledge to run a positive campaign.
"A day after Barack Obama goes out and eschews the politics of slash-and-burn, his campaign embraces the politics of trash," said Phil Singer, Clinton's deputy communications director, referring to a speech Obama made Tuesday in Las Vegas.
Obama communications director Robert Gibbs took a markedly different course. After refusing to get in the "middle of a disagreement between the Clintons and someone who was once one of their biggest supporters," Gibbs pointed out that Hillary Clinton had recently praised Robert Ford, another South Carolina state senator who endorsed her and said the Democratic ticket would be in serious trouble if Obama was the nominee because of the color of his skin. Clinton distanced herself from that remark, and Ford later apologized for it.
Obama weighed in later. "It's not clear to me why I would be apologizing for someone else's remarks," he said in Iowa, where he had gone instead of the candidates forum because of a prior commitment. "My sense is that Mr. Geffen may have differences with the Clintons, but that doesn't really have anything to do with our campaign."
At the forum in Carson City, Nev., ABC's George Stephanopoulos, the moderator, asked Clinton whether she agreed with her campaign spokesman that Obama should disavow Geffen's comments.
Clinton did not answer directly. "I want to run a very positive campaign, and I sure don't want Democrats or supporters of Democrats to be engaging in the politics of personal destruction," she said. "I think we should stay focused on what we're going to do for America." She then added, to applause: "And, you know, I believe Bill Clinton was a good president. I'm very proud of the record of his two terms."
New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson sided with Clinton and called on Obama to denounce Geffen's comments. "I think these name-callings are not good," he said. "I don't know Mr. Geffen. I don't know what was said. . . . But we don't need that. We Democrats should sign a pledge that we all be positive. That's what the American people want."
While her campaign was on the attack against Obama, Clinton found herself on the defensive once more over Iraq. She was challenged again to explain her vote for the 2002 resolution authorizing the war and her reluctance to call that vote a mistake or to express regret for it.
"My vote was a sincere vote based on the facts and assurances that I had at the time," Clinton said. "And I have taken responsibility for my votes and I believe that none of us should get a free pass. It is us up to the voters to judge what each of us has said and done."
Yesterday's forum was sponsored by the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME). In addition to Clinton and Richardson, participants included Sen. Christopher J. Dodd (Conn.), former Iowa governor Tom Vilsack, former senator John Edwards (N.C.), Sen. Joseph R. Biden Jr. (Del.), Rep. Dennis J. Kucinich (Ohio) and former senator Mike Gravel (Alaska).
The forum highlighted the West's emerging role as a significant player in the Democratic nomination process. Nevada is scheduled to hold its caucuses five days after the Iowa caucuses, the second contest on the 2008 Democratic calendar.
AFSCME President Gerald McEntee said the union hopes to endorse one of the Democrats before the primary elections. But he said the process will be slower, given the union's experience of having endorsed Howard Dean four years ago, only to see his campaign implode.
Iraq and health care dominated the forum. Vilsack offered the clearest call for Congress to stop funding the Iraq war and bring the troops home. But Biden warned that hasty withdrawal could leave the region in chaos. "People say just get out," he said. "Everybody wants to get out, no one faster than I want to get out. But if that civil war metastasizes into a regional war, we're going to be sending your grandchildren back."
Dodd was asked whether Clinton should apologize for her vote on the war. "Senator Clinton will speak for herself," he said, adding: "When you've made a mistake, there's nothing wrong with admitting that, in my view. . . . It was a mistake, in my view, to vote the way we did five years ago on that resolution."
Edwards, who also supported the authorization of the war, issued what sounded like a clear challenge to the New York senator to say she is sorry for her vote.
"We need a leader who will be open and honest with you and with the American people," he said. "Who will tell the truth when they've made a mistake, who will take responsibility when they've made a mistake."
Asked whether what Clinton had said about her vote was inadequate, he replied, "Whether it's good enough is between her and her conscience. It's not for me to judge."
Balz reported from Carson City.
A story in this morning's WaPo about a Democratic presidential candidate forum in Nevada brings home the growing importance of winning in the West, it also highlights the growing discord between Obama and Clinton. Here at OK Blue Notes we have assigned each of our ODP interns to track and write about one of the presidential candidates. Their postings will reflect their work. In the meantime, the rest of us here at the ODP will post items we find of interest to our Oklahoma readers about national, state, and local politics. A posting does not imply endorsement for any candidate for office at any level.
Read about the West and the Clinton Obama feud below.
Clinton, Obama Camps' Feud Is Out in the Open
By Chris Cillizza and Dan Balz
Washington Post Staff Writers
Thursday, February 22, 2007; A01
An increasingly acrimonious competition between Sens. Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton to enlist the Democratic Party's leading fundraisers and operatives burst into the open yesterday, overshadowing what was billed as the presidential campaign's first gathering of candidates in Nevada.
While Clinton (N.Y.) and Obama (Ill.) have not for the most part taken their competition public, their campaigns in recent weeks have been trumpeting each victory, such as the recruitment of a major Boston-based rainmaker by Obama and a prominent African American state senator from South Carolina by Clinton.
The back-and-forth between the two campaigns has largely been fodder for political insiders. Yesterday, however, David Geffen, the music and film producer who is one of the party's most prominent donors, made the fight more public. In an interview with New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd, Geffen said that Clinton is "the easiest to beat" of the Democratic field and skewered her unwillingness to apologize for her 2002 vote to use force in Iraq. "It's not a very big thing to say 'I made a mistake' on the war, and typical of Hillary Clinton that she can't," Geffen said.
Geffen, who was a co-host of an Obama fundraiser Tuesday night in Los Angeles, saved even sharper criticism for former president Bill Clinton, to whom he was close before a falling-out over the pardoning of financier Marc Rich at the end of Clinton's second term. "I don't think anybody believes that in the last six years, all of a sudden Bill Clinton has become a different person," Geffen said in an oblique reference to questions surrounding the former president's private life.
After seeing the comments yesterday morning, the Clinton campaign immediately issued a call for Obama to disavow Geffen's remarks and return his $2,300 donation, arguing that they were contrary to Obama's pledge to run a positive campaign.
"A day after Barack Obama goes out and eschews the politics of slash-and-burn, his campaign embraces the politics of trash," said Phil Singer, Clinton's deputy communications director, referring to a speech Obama made Tuesday in Las Vegas.
Obama communications director Robert Gibbs took a markedly different course. After refusing to get in the "middle of a disagreement between the Clintons and someone who was once one of their biggest supporters," Gibbs pointed out that Hillary Clinton had recently praised Robert Ford, another South Carolina state senator who endorsed her and said the Democratic ticket would be in serious trouble if Obama was the nominee because of the color of his skin. Clinton distanced herself from that remark, and Ford later apologized for it.
Obama weighed in later. "It's not clear to me why I would be apologizing for someone else's remarks," he said in Iowa, where he had gone instead of the candidates forum because of a prior commitment. "My sense is that Mr. Geffen may have differences with the Clintons, but that doesn't really have anything to do with our campaign."
At the forum in Carson City, Nev., ABC's George Stephanopoulos, the moderator, asked Clinton whether she agreed with her campaign spokesman that Obama should disavow Geffen's comments.
Clinton did not answer directly. "I want to run a very positive campaign, and I sure don't want Democrats or supporters of Democrats to be engaging in the politics of personal destruction," she said. "I think we should stay focused on what we're going to do for America." She then added, to applause: "And, you know, I believe Bill Clinton was a good president. I'm very proud of the record of his two terms."
New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson sided with Clinton and called on Obama to denounce Geffen's comments. "I think these name-callings are not good," he said. "I don't know Mr. Geffen. I don't know what was said. . . . But we don't need that. We Democrats should sign a pledge that we all be positive. That's what the American people want."
While her campaign was on the attack against Obama, Clinton found herself on the defensive once more over Iraq. She was challenged again to explain her vote for the 2002 resolution authorizing the war and her reluctance to call that vote a mistake or to express regret for it.
"My vote was a sincere vote based on the facts and assurances that I had at the time," Clinton said. "And I have taken responsibility for my votes and I believe that none of us should get a free pass. It is us up to the voters to judge what each of us has said and done."
Yesterday's forum was sponsored by the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME). In addition to Clinton and Richardson, participants included Sen. Christopher J. Dodd (Conn.), former Iowa governor Tom Vilsack, former senator John Edwards (N.C.), Sen. Joseph R. Biden Jr. (Del.), Rep. Dennis J. Kucinich (Ohio) and former senator Mike Gravel (Alaska).
The forum highlighted the West's emerging role as a significant player in the Democratic nomination process. Nevada is scheduled to hold its caucuses five days after the Iowa caucuses, the second contest on the 2008 Democratic calendar.
AFSCME President Gerald McEntee said the union hopes to endorse one of the Democrats before the primary elections. But he said the process will be slower, given the union's experience of having endorsed Howard Dean four years ago, only to see his campaign implode.
Iraq and health care dominated the forum. Vilsack offered the clearest call for Congress to stop funding the Iraq war and bring the troops home. But Biden warned that hasty withdrawal could leave the region in chaos. "People say just get out," he said. "Everybody wants to get out, no one faster than I want to get out. But if that civil war metastasizes into a regional war, we're going to be sending your grandchildren back."
Dodd was asked whether Clinton should apologize for her vote on the war. "Senator Clinton will speak for herself," he said, adding: "When you've made a mistake, there's nothing wrong with admitting that, in my view. . . . It was a mistake, in my view, to vote the way we did five years ago on that resolution."
Edwards, who also supported the authorization of the war, issued what sounded like a clear challenge to the New York senator to say she is sorry for her vote.
"We need a leader who will be open and honest with you and with the American people," he said. "Who will tell the truth when they've made a mistake, who will take responsibility when they've made a mistake."
Asked whether what Clinton had said about her vote was inadequate, he replied, "Whether it's good enough is between her and her conscience. It's not for me to judge."
Balz reported from Carson City.
Wednesday, February 21, 2007
Gridiron
Congratulations to the OKC Gridiron Club for a great opening night performance tonight. The first act was national and the second act was state and local. The performances were terrific, the actors funny, the singing great, and the camaraderie of the cast and orchestra was enthusiastic.
Many of the politicians "roasted" in the dialogue were present tonight including Gov. Brad and First Lady Kim Henry, State Treasurer Scott Meacham, and State Superintendent Sandy Garrett.
Other state leaders present included Attorney General Drew Edmondson, State Labor Commissioner Lloyd Fields and State Insurance Commissioner Kim Holland. Former Senate President Pro Tempore Cal Hobson was there as were State Representatives Mike Shelton, James Covey, and Joe Dorman. Oklahoma County Commissioner Jim Roth was in the house too.
Andrew Harris does a great imitation of Gov. Henry paired with Bart Vieugels as Scott Meacham.
John Greiner waas a believable Will Rogers and Kim Stem does a fancy impression of Mary Fallin.
Proceeds from the show support scholarships for journalism students.
For tickets check out the website at http://www.okcgridiron.org/current.htm.
Clinton on Iran:
Security is going to be a huge issue in 2008, as it has been for the past 6 years. This past Sunday, Hillary Clinton spoke to a crowd in Dover, Delaware about the dangers Iran poses to the U.S.
"Taking action against Iran 'would be a mistake of historic proportions,' she said.
Iran 'does pose dangers to America and the world,' she added, but said a different approach is needed.
'Iran cannot be handled the same way the president has handled Iraq and North Korea.'
http://www.fosters.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070218/FOSTERS01/70218010
U.S.-Iranian relations have been strained over the past few years over Iran's nuclear ambition, and the war in Iraq. More recently, there have been claims that the Iranian government is flooding arms across it's borders to insurgents.
- Gregory Gaede
Security is going to be a huge issue in 2008, as it has been for the past 6 years. This past Sunday, Hillary Clinton spoke to a crowd in Dover, Delaware about the dangers Iran poses to the U.S.
"Taking action against Iran 'would be a mistake of historic proportions,' she said.
Iran 'does pose dangers to America and the world,' she added, but said a different approach is needed.
'Iran cannot be handled the same way the president has handled Iraq and North Korea.'
http://www.fosters.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070218/FOSTERS01/70218010
U.S.-Iranian relations have been strained over the past few years over Iran's nuclear ambition, and the war in Iraq. More recently, there have been claims that the Iranian government is flooding arms across it's borders to insurgents.
- Gregory Gaede
John Edwards '08 in OK
At last weekend's State Central Committee meeting DNC Committeeman Jim Frasier reported that he raised $70,000 for Edwards at a mid-week noon time event in his Tulsa home last week. Other listed sponsors included Michael Atkinson, Glenn Beustring, Pat & Carolyn Carr, David Chernicky, Frank Frasier, John & Shirley Harlan, Steve Hickman, Tim Inman, Lilian Jayne, Tony & Brenda Laizure, Bob Lemon, Sen. Judy McIntyre, Larry Oliver, Phil & Memory Ostrander, Rep. Eric Proctor, and Jack Zurawik.
Another recent Edwards event in OKC reportedly netted $100,000. The Host Committee included Ed Abel, Lydia Barrett & Richard Denney, David & Heather Burrage, Mike & Aletha Burrage, Sean & Carole Burrage, Steve & Roberta Burrage, Simone & Peter Fulmer, John C. Goodson, Jack Mattingly, Sr., Jack Mattingly, Jr., Gordon Melson, Rep. Jerry McPeak, Sen. Mike Morgan, Bradley & Jada Norman, John B. and Cynthia Norman, John W. and Cecelia Norman, Jeff & Khristy Potts, Jason & Terri Roselius, Sen. John Sparks, Larry Tawwater, Sen. Stratton Taylor, Douglas & Amy Terry, Reggie & Rachelle Whitten, and John & Cindy Zelbst.
At last weekend's State Central Committee meeting DNC Committeeman Jim Frasier reported that he raised $70,000 for Edwards at a mid-week noon time event in his Tulsa home last week. Other listed sponsors included Michael Atkinson, Glenn Beustring, Pat & Carolyn Carr, David Chernicky, Frank Frasier, John & Shirley Harlan, Steve Hickman, Tim Inman, Lilian Jayne, Tony & Brenda Laizure, Bob Lemon, Sen. Judy McIntyre, Larry Oliver, Phil & Memory Ostrander, Rep. Eric Proctor, and Jack Zurawik.
Another recent Edwards event in OKC reportedly netted $100,000. The Host Committee included Ed Abel, Lydia Barrett & Richard Denney, David & Heather Burrage, Mike & Aletha Burrage, Sean & Carole Burrage, Steve & Roberta Burrage, Simone & Peter Fulmer, John C. Goodson, Jack Mattingly, Sr., Jack Mattingly, Jr., Gordon Melson, Rep. Jerry McPeak, Sen. Mike Morgan, Bradley & Jada Norman, John B. and Cynthia Norman, John W. and Cecelia Norman, Jeff & Khristy Potts, Jason & Terri Roselius, Sen. John Sparks, Larry Tawwater, Sen. Stratton Taylor, Douglas & Amy Terry, Reggie & Rachelle Whitten, and John & Cindy Zelbst.
Gov. Bill Richardson
Sources tell me that the March 18th event for presidential candidate New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson will be sponsored by Robert Hefner, Mark Schwartz, Mike Lawter, Tim Reese, and Fred Harris.
I met Richardson at the DNC Winter meeting earlier this month and was very impressed by his speech which outlined his accomplishments as New Mexico Governor. One thing that he said that really intrigued me was that as Governor he improved teachers' salaries from 47th in the nation to 27th in the nation.
I told all who asked that for me, Richardson was the "break away" speaker of the weekend --- someone to listen to and watch, a definite contender.
Sources tell me that the March 18th event for presidential candidate New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson will be sponsored by Robert Hefner, Mark Schwartz, Mike Lawter, Tim Reese, and Fred Harris.
I met Richardson at the DNC Winter meeting earlier this month and was very impressed by his speech which outlined his accomplishments as New Mexico Governor. One thing that he said that really intrigued me was that as Governor he improved teachers' salaries from 47th in the nation to 27th in the nation.
I told all who asked that for me, Richardson was the "break away" speaker of the weekend --- someone to listen to and watch, a definite contender.
All Kids Act Clears Committee
Committee Approves Senate Democrats Plan to
Provide Access to Health Care for More Children
(Oklahoma City) – The Senate Appropriations Committee gave approval Wednesday to a key health care component of the Senate Democrats’ “Oklahoma Rising” agenda. Senate Bill 424 provides access to quality health care for more of Oklahoma’s uninsured children.
Named the “All Kids Act,” the measure would increase the number of children eligible to receive Medicaid benefits in the state by closing the gap between those children presently receiving Medicaid benefits and those covered under private insurance held by their parents.
Senate President Pro Tempore Mike Morgan credited the work of Senator Tom Adelson, D-Tulsa, for winning passage of the measure. Adelson, Morgan said, continues to “work tirelessly to reduce the number of uninsured in Oklahoma.”
“By far the largest group among the uninsured in our state are children who honestly fall though the cracks. Their parents don’t make enough to afford health insurance but make too much to be eligible for Medicaid. This legislation will provide a bridge, giving these children access to quality health care and allow them to lead healthy, productive lives,” Senate President Pro Tempore Mike Morgan said.
The “All Kids Act” would increase Medicaid eligibility for children from 185 percent of the poverty level to 300 percent – the maximum allowed by the federal government. That will enable the state’s Medicaid program to provide coverage for as many as 42,000 additional children.
Currently in Oklahoma, children whose parents make $37,000 or less a year are eligible for Medicaid. Senate Bill 424 would increase that income ceiling to $60,000 a year.
State costs to provide the additional coverage are estimated at $8.5 million, allowing the state to draw down nearly $30 million in federal matching funds.
StopIranWar.com Launch
Today, former General Wes Clark launched a website featuring a petition to President Bush asking him to refrain from using military force in resolving the Iran predicament. This site has already gathered over 5,000 supporters, and continues to grow.
Check out the website here and lend your support.
-Nicole Morgan
One single, little tiny snowflake isn’t scary. Ten snowflakes probably wouldn’t even make the weather forecast. A million snowflakes, all different in their very own way- I think that might make the news. A million snowflakes may get noticed, but 42.8 million snowflakes… that could change things. Maybe some slippery spots on the road, pulling out your favorite scarf to keep your neck warm, some rosy cheeks; all distinct possibilities when 26.9 million snowflakes team up and decide to make a difference.
According to www.youthvote.org, there are 26,917,473 people between the ages of 18 and 25. That number sounds big, but only about 59.9 percent of the people falling into that category are actually registered to vote… taking us back down to about 16.1 million registered voters between the ages of 18 and 25. That’s a pretty big difference. How much of a difference can 16.1 million snowflakes make? Not as much as if those other nine something million snowflakes joined the fight.
We all know them, the people who just don’t bother to register to vote because “they can’t make a difference.” And, “the presidential election isn’t decided by the popular vote, it’s the Electoral College that decides.” There are very few examples of the Electoral College going against the popular vote, and the presidential election is not the only election taking place. Excuse me while I roll my eyes and point out that candidates running for offices are now more interested in young voters, simply because they have been showing up more in polls and are generally more progressive in their views for the country and where they would like to see it go in the future.
The future of our country is important to us as young people, and that very idea is catching on.
Candidates see it, the news media sees it, researchers see it, and even P. Diddy sees it. Vote or die, right? Why are so many of us youngsters still choosing to be ignorant? Arm yourself with knowledge; arm yourself with the power to change things.
The most important things in getting young people involved are to not only register to vote, but to get them to show up in the polls, and to letting every voter know how much of a difference each their little vote can make. If you don’t agree with certain pieces of legislation that may tread on your civil rights, go vote. If you’re worried that your city council would be going in the wrong direction if a certain candidate is elected, go vote. You can’t change policy by simply griping about it. You must take action!
In the words of Mahatma Gandhi, “be the change that you want to see in the world.”
According to www.democraticyouth.org, if young people had voted in the 2004 election, 11 states won by Bush would have been won by Kerry. That’s huge. If you don’t like the current administration, think about that for a second. Where were you, young voters? I was there, where were you? People falling into the 18-25 age bracket… I’ll let you think about that.
The youth of America will have to deal with the results of government longer than the baby boomers lose their votes, so keep your interests in mind as you elect our officials. Not only presidents, but senators, representatives, mayors, even school board members. “Your life today is a result of your thinking yesterday. Your life tomorrow will be determined by what you think today,” John C. Maxwell hits the nail right on the head. We must take the initiative to think ahead and pave the road for ourselves.
My vote is no more important that your vote, but together we can make two voters. Two voices. Our two voices are twice as loud as the voices of the people who can’t be bothered today to make it to the poll, or to fill out their absentee ballot. They’re silent now, but when decisions are made that they don’t agree with, they’ll be loud. Maybe even louder than our combined voices, but don’t worry, we made our voices heard when it mattered the most.
As the political climate in this country changes, force lawmakers, decision makers, and the people in power wear their heaviest coats because of the snow. Snowflakes can cause people to change their behavior, but only if the snowflakes band together to wreak havoc on the roads, stick together to make snowmen, and cause you to wear your sunglasses during the wintertime because you can’t escape the brightness of all those tiny snowflakes.
- Lacey Earls, ODP Intern
According to www.youthvote.org, there are 26,917,473 people between the ages of 18 and 25. That number sounds big, but only about 59.9 percent of the people falling into that category are actually registered to vote… taking us back down to about 16.1 million registered voters between the ages of 18 and 25. That’s a pretty big difference. How much of a difference can 16.1 million snowflakes make? Not as much as if those other nine something million snowflakes joined the fight.
We all know them, the people who just don’t bother to register to vote because “they can’t make a difference.” And, “the presidential election isn’t decided by the popular vote, it’s the Electoral College that decides.” There are very few examples of the Electoral College going against the popular vote, and the presidential election is not the only election taking place. Excuse me while I roll my eyes and point out that candidates running for offices are now more interested in young voters, simply because they have been showing up more in polls and are generally more progressive in their views for the country and where they would like to see it go in the future.
The future of our country is important to us as young people, and that very idea is catching on.
Candidates see it, the news media sees it, researchers see it, and even P. Diddy sees it. Vote or die, right? Why are so many of us youngsters still choosing to be ignorant? Arm yourself with knowledge; arm yourself with the power to change things.
The most important things in getting young people involved are to not only register to vote, but to get them to show up in the polls, and to letting every voter know how much of a difference each their little vote can make. If you don’t agree with certain pieces of legislation that may tread on your civil rights, go vote. If you’re worried that your city council would be going in the wrong direction if a certain candidate is elected, go vote. You can’t change policy by simply griping about it. You must take action!
In the words of Mahatma Gandhi, “be the change that you want to see in the world.”
According to www.democraticyouth.org, if young people had voted in the 2004 election, 11 states won by Bush would have been won by Kerry. That’s huge. If you don’t like the current administration, think about that for a second. Where were you, young voters? I was there, where were you? People falling into the 18-25 age bracket… I’ll let you think about that.
The youth of America will have to deal with the results of government longer than the baby boomers lose their votes, so keep your interests in mind as you elect our officials. Not only presidents, but senators, representatives, mayors, even school board members. “Your life today is a result of your thinking yesterday. Your life tomorrow will be determined by what you think today,” John C. Maxwell hits the nail right on the head. We must take the initiative to think ahead and pave the road for ourselves.
My vote is no more important that your vote, but together we can make two voters. Two voices. Our two voices are twice as loud as the voices of the people who can’t be bothered today to make it to the poll, or to fill out their absentee ballot. They’re silent now, but when decisions are made that they don’t agree with, they’ll be loud. Maybe even louder than our combined voices, but don’t worry, we made our voices heard when it mattered the most.
As the political climate in this country changes, force lawmakers, decision makers, and the people in power wear their heaviest coats because of the snow. Snowflakes can cause people to change their behavior, but only if the snowflakes band together to wreak havoc on the roads, stick together to make snowmen, and cause you to wear your sunglasses during the wintertime because you can’t escape the brightness of all those tiny snowflakes.
- Lacey Earls, ODP Intern
Legislative Car Tags
Will the real HD 46 representative please drive by? Former HD 46 member Doug Miller was reportedly seen this week in Norman driving a car with a "complimentary" HD 46 legislative license plate on it --- a license plate that was his to use while he was a State House member. One could assume that four months after his replacement was sworn into office the plate switch would be complete and that the new representative would have the official HD 46 plates.
I wonder if this means the legislator turned lobbyist is also using state capitol parking privileges?
Check out this website that displays Oklahoma license plates. Click here.
Langston - Hidden Treasure
Last night I had the great privilege of attending an event at Langston University's Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Complex.
Langston University President JoAnn W. Haysbert is a Leadership Oklahoma colleague of mine and she graciously invited our class to participate in the event that featured Lt. Governor Jari Askins hosted by Senate President Pro Tempore Mike Morgan and State Rep. Lee Denney. The university is in Morgan's senate district and Denney's house distict.
We toured the world-renowned agriculture research facility and hear highlights of the programs that support the facility and the university's land grant mission. I was very impressed with Dr. Marvin Burns' presentation -- Langston A Hidden Treasure. Others on the program included Bob Drake, Dale Coody, Wes Harden and Oklahoma Secretary of Agriculture Terry Peach.
As someone who raised Angora goats in the '90s I was already aware of the fabulous work being done at Langston but was really impressed with the new Kika de la Garza facility. The scientists told us they need more projects and are eager to expand their work their. This is no addendum to the program at Langston, it is a jewel in the crown for the School of Agriculture and Applied Sciences.
It was great to visit with the students, faculty and administrators of the university and I hope to return to the campus soon.
Also attending were Rep. Mike Shelton and Rep. Anastasia Pittman, both Langston graduates. Other Democratic legislators I saw at the event include Rep. Mike Brown, Rep. Jeannie McDaniel, Rep. Darrell Gilbert, and Rep. R.C. Pruett.
Thanks Dr. Haysbert for unveiling a Hidden Treasure.
Last night I had the great privilege of attending an event at Langston University's Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Complex.
Langston University President JoAnn W. Haysbert is a Leadership Oklahoma colleague of mine and she graciously invited our class to participate in the event that featured Lt. Governor Jari Askins hosted by Senate President Pro Tempore Mike Morgan and State Rep. Lee Denney. The university is in Morgan's senate district and Denney's house distict.
We toured the world-renowned agriculture research facility and hear highlights of the programs that support the facility and the university's land grant mission. I was very impressed with Dr. Marvin Burns' presentation -- Langston A Hidden Treasure. Others on the program included Bob Drake, Dale Coody, Wes Harden and Oklahoma Secretary of Agriculture Terry Peach.
As someone who raised Angora goats in the '90s I was already aware of the fabulous work being done at Langston but was really impressed with the new Kika de la Garza facility. The scientists told us they need more projects and are eager to expand their work their. This is no addendum to the program at Langston, it is a jewel in the crown for the School of Agriculture and Applied Sciences.
It was great to visit with the students, faculty and administrators of the university and I hope to return to the campus soon.
Also attending were Rep. Mike Shelton and Rep. Anastasia Pittman, both Langston graduates. Other Democratic legislators I saw at the event include Rep. Mike Brown, Rep. Jeannie McDaniel, Rep. Darrell Gilbert, and Rep. R.C. Pruett.
Thanks Dr. Haysbert for unveiling a Hidden Treasure.
Morning Coffee Rant
I'm no economist but could it possibly be that the Equalization Board's reduced estimate for individual income tax collections is somehow related to the Republican rush to decimate the tax base? Could it be that when you reduce taxes you actually collect fewer dollars?
It's disappointing to see that Senator Glenn Coffee is pleased that the state will have fewer new dollars to spend. And it's enlightening that he's finally admitting that there is something wrong with "the national economic climate" -- the Bush economy. Gee, the American middle class has known that for quite some time now.
I'm glad to see that Democratic Governor Brad Henry is holding firm on his funding priorities and I hope that the Senate Democrats and House Democrats will do the same --- I expect they will -- it's genetic with us --- strong investments in education, health care and research grow an opportunity economy and a healthy citzenry.
In the meantime, expect that the right-wingers at the state capitol will look for every way possible to criticize the Governor's priorities and commitments to expand education opportunities and ramp up sorely needed access to health care and job producing, income generating research for Oklahoma citizens.
The Republicans continually make mountains out of molehills, seizing on every jot and tittle of ongoing discussions about how to spend the taxpayers' money. Come on guys. Take a look at the forest, not just the next election in front of you. Now that's a good idea.
Tuesday, February 20, 2007
Daily Oklahoman:State Democratic party's leader announces she won't run again
The group's second-in-command said he is seeking the top position
The chairman of the Oklahoma Democratic Party, who reduced the party's debt by about 70 percent in less than two years, said Saturday she will not seek a second term.
Lisa Pryor of Norman announced her decision during a meeting of the party's central committee.
"At this time I have no plans to run for re-election as your party chair,” Pryor said in her statement. "I am working on my options both in and out of politics. When the time is right, I will announce what I am going to do.”
Pryor was elected party chairman in May 2005. She also serves as the party's executive director, which pays about $60,000 annually.
Ben Odom, the party's vice chairman, announced this month he will run for party chairman.
Democratic delegates will elect a chairman and other party officers during their party's convention May 19 in Oklahoma City.
State Republican Party Chairman Tom Daxon said Saturday he will seek a full two-year term. He announced his plans to those attending Tulsa County's Republican convention.
Others seeking the Republican chairman's position, which pays about $65,000 annually, are former party chairman Gary Jones of rural Cache and Jerry Buchanan of Tulsa, who is chairman of the Tulsa County Republican Party.
When Pryor was elected Democratic party chairman, she found the party was about $540,000 in debt.
Pryor worked steadily to chip away at the debt.
The latest papers filed with the Federal Election Commission show the party's debt is $158,592. Pryor told committee members Saturday she is working on a plan to have the debt reduced to $50,000 by the end of the month.
By Michael McNutt
Oklahoman Capitol Bureau
The group's second-in-command said he is seeking the top position
The chairman of the Oklahoma Democratic Party, who reduced the party's debt by about 70 percent in less than two years, said Saturday she will not seek a second term.
Lisa Pryor of Norman announced her decision during a meeting of the party's central committee.
"At this time I have no plans to run for re-election as your party chair,” Pryor said in her statement. "I am working on my options both in and out of politics. When the time is right, I will announce what I am going to do.”
Pryor was elected party chairman in May 2005. She also serves as the party's executive director, which pays about $60,000 annually.
Ben Odom, the party's vice chairman, announced this month he will run for party chairman.
Democratic delegates will elect a chairman and other party officers during their party's convention May 19 in Oklahoma City.
State Republican Party Chairman Tom Daxon said Saturday he will seek a full two-year term. He announced his plans to those attending Tulsa County's Republican convention.
Others seeking the Republican chairman's position, which pays about $65,000 annually, are former party chairman Gary Jones of rural Cache and Jerry Buchanan of Tulsa, who is chairman of the Tulsa County Republican Party.
When Pryor was elected Democratic party chairman, she found the party was about $540,000 in debt.
Pryor worked steadily to chip away at the debt.
The latest papers filed with the Federal Election Commission show the party's debt is $158,592. Pryor told committee members Saturday she is working on a plan to have the debt reduced to $50,000 by the end of the month.
By Michael McNutt
Oklahoman Capitol Bureau
Tulsa World: OK Dems edge out GOP donors
The Tulsa World profiled political contributions in the last election cycle on Sunday. State Chairman Lisa Pryor explained that Dems edged Republicans because the party and its candidates gave the voters a better way to contribute in 2006 with targeted fund raising appeals.
OK Dems edge out GOP donors
By CURTIS KILLMAN World Staff Writer
2/18/2007
While Democrats hold an 11 percent edge over Republicans in state voter registration, the two parties were neck and neck in candidate fundraising during the 2006 campaign, a Tulsa World analysis of records shows.
Democratic candidates raised a collective $20.3 million for all their statewide campaigns, edging out Republicans, who raised $19.8 million.
In all, state political candidates, including nonpartisan and independent candidates, raised a collective $43 million for their 2006 campaigns.
A Democratic party spokeswoman said the numbers reflect improved fundraising methods.
"We are getting a lot better at strategic fundraising than we have been in the past, I believe," state Democratic Party Chairwoman Lisa Pryor said, noting that "Republicans typically have deeper pockets in Oklahoma."
Democratic candidates raised an average of $114,000 for each of the 178 who reported active fundraising campaigns.
Republicans, meanwhile, raised an average of $117,000 for each of the 169 GOP candidates. The totals do not include revenues carried forward from previous campaigns.
State GOP Chairman Tom Daxon said the small funding difference between the parties indicates his party is on the upswing.
"I suspect those numbers would have been skewed heavily toward the Democrats 15 or 20 years ago," Daxon said.
Suggestions that the state Republican Party has deep pockets is "hogwash," Daxon said.
"By and large, the heart of our support is as always small-business people, retired people, just ordinary people who are trying to support a family," Daxon said.
Overall, the House of Representatives candidates collected the most money among state office seekers.
The 223 House candidates raised about $9.1 million during the campaign. The race for governor attracted the second most, with about $8.2 million going toward the five candidates.
State Senate candidates raised the third most, with $7.9 million reported by 61 candidates.
A hotly contested lieutenant governor's race, which attracted eight candidates, saw a total of $5.3 million flow into their respective campaign bank accounts.
Also, the political party that won or controlled the various offices outcollected its counterpart in all but two cases, the World's analysis found.
Democrats outraised and won or maintained control of the state Senate, governor, attorney general, auditor and inspector, insurance commissioner, labor commissioner and superintendent of public instruction posts.
Republicans, meanwhile, outraised and maintained their majority control of the state House of Representatives. The only exception to the rule was in the state treasurer and lieutenant governor races, where Republican candidates raised the most money collectively among their candidates, but lost to Democrats.
"The election was a disaster for the Republicans nationally, but in Oklahoma we held our ground," Daxon said. "To be able to do that and not have an edge in funding indicates that we have some things going on from an organizational standpoint that helped us in this election, especially in the midst of a terrible national climate."
Pryor said Democrats have stepped up what she described as targeted fundraising efforts. The strategy includes using analysis of past voter records and campaign donations to pinpoint those most likely to give.
"I think Democrats are getting better at our fundraising appeals," Pryor said. "We're asking more people to give more often."
Democrats are also using the Internet to appeal for contributions on a quarterly basis, she said.
"We're just trying to make it easier to give and give them better reasons to give to our candidates and our party," Pryor said.
Both parties credited the other party with helping their candidates.
"We have some Democrats who are in fact Republicans and will support Republican candidates," Daxon said.
Pryor, meanwhile, said many Republicans were strong supporters of Democratic candidates.
"I talked to lots and lots of people who are registered Republicans in this last cycle who just said, 'You know I've always been a Republican, but I'm going to vote for Brad Henry and I'm going to give money.' "
Most agree fundraising dominates any statewide race.
"It takes money to win," Pryor said.
"Conventional wisdom now tells us to win a legislative race you have to raise $200,000 or more, and for a House race $100,000 or more," Pryor said.
House candidates who faced an election opponent and won raised an average of $82,000 for their campaigns, records indicate. In the Senate, the average was $210,000.
That's not to say a candidate can't win a seat in the Legislature by spending less money. Rep. Charles Key, R-Oklahoma City, who won his House seat by beating a primary opponent, raised just $23,375, the least among winning House candidates facing an opponent.
Sen. Constance Johnson, D-Oklahoma City, raised the least amount among winning Senate candidates: $58,711. She won her seat at the primary level, too.
At the other end of the money spectrum is Sen. Sean Burrage, D-Claremore, the top state Senate fundraiser who reported collecting $651,755 during his campaign.
In the House, Speaker Lance Cargill, who did not draw an opponent, reported collecting $445,675 during his campaign. Thad Balkman, who did draw an opponent and lost, collected the second most among House candidates, $246,023.
Pryor said while those who raise the most don't always win their races, it is a key component to winning.
"In a typical race, money really does make a difference, because money can communicate your message to the voters and you have to have that unless you have very high name recognition," Pryor said.
Meanwhile, Oklahoma State University political science professor Jim Davis said there may be at least one other reason why fundraising totals are so close between the two parties despite their disparate registration numbers.
Davis calls certain Democrats in Oklahoma "plums," a term which is reflective of blending blue and red, colors assigned to the two parties by the media.
"They are Democrats, but there is more red color than blue," Davis said.
The so-called plums, unlike the traditional Oklahoma Democrats, are more inclined to back and contribute to Republican candidates in state and national races, Davis said.
Overall, candidates are also able to raise more money because campaigns are getting better at fundraising.
Professional fundraisers, media handlers, public relations experts -- they are all being used more and as a result driving up costs, Davis said.
"They are more expensive than the old party hacks who've done it several times," Davis said. "If you are professionalized and I'm not, all things being equal, you are going to win."
The Tulsa World profiled political contributions in the last election cycle on Sunday. State Chairman Lisa Pryor explained that Dems edged Republicans because the party and its candidates gave the voters a better way to contribute in 2006 with targeted fund raising appeals.
OK Dems edge out GOP donors
By CURTIS KILLMAN World Staff Writer
2/18/2007
While Democrats hold an 11 percent edge over Republicans in state voter registration, the two parties were neck and neck in candidate fundraising during the 2006 campaign, a Tulsa World analysis of records shows.
Democratic candidates raised a collective $20.3 million for all their statewide campaigns, edging out Republicans, who raised $19.8 million.
In all, state political candidates, including nonpartisan and independent candidates, raised a collective $43 million for their 2006 campaigns.
A Democratic party spokeswoman said the numbers reflect improved fundraising methods.
"We are getting a lot better at strategic fundraising than we have been in the past, I believe," state Democratic Party Chairwoman Lisa Pryor said, noting that "Republicans typically have deeper pockets in Oklahoma."
Democratic candidates raised an average of $114,000 for each of the 178 who reported active fundraising campaigns.
Republicans, meanwhile, raised an average of $117,000 for each of the 169 GOP candidates. The totals do not include revenues carried forward from previous campaigns.
State GOP Chairman Tom Daxon said the small funding difference between the parties indicates his party is on the upswing.
"I suspect those numbers would have been skewed heavily toward the Democrats 15 or 20 years ago," Daxon said.
Suggestions that the state Republican Party has deep pockets is "hogwash," Daxon said.
"By and large, the heart of our support is as always small-business people, retired people, just ordinary people who are trying to support a family," Daxon said.
Overall, the House of Representatives candidates collected the most money among state office seekers.
The 223 House candidates raised about $9.1 million during the campaign. The race for governor attracted the second most, with about $8.2 million going toward the five candidates.
State Senate candidates raised the third most, with $7.9 million reported by 61 candidates.
A hotly contested lieutenant governor's race, which attracted eight candidates, saw a total of $5.3 million flow into their respective campaign bank accounts.
Also, the political party that won or controlled the various offices outcollected its counterpart in all but two cases, the World's analysis found.
Democrats outraised and won or maintained control of the state Senate, governor, attorney general, auditor and inspector, insurance commissioner, labor commissioner and superintendent of public instruction posts.
Republicans, meanwhile, outraised and maintained their majority control of the state House of Representatives. The only exception to the rule was in the state treasurer and lieutenant governor races, where Republican candidates raised the most money collectively among their candidates, but lost to Democrats.
"The election was a disaster for the Republicans nationally, but in Oklahoma we held our ground," Daxon said. "To be able to do that and not have an edge in funding indicates that we have some things going on from an organizational standpoint that helped us in this election, especially in the midst of a terrible national climate."
Pryor said Democrats have stepped up what she described as targeted fundraising efforts. The strategy includes using analysis of past voter records and campaign donations to pinpoint those most likely to give.
"I think Democrats are getting better at our fundraising appeals," Pryor said. "We're asking more people to give more often."
Democrats are also using the Internet to appeal for contributions on a quarterly basis, she said.
"We're just trying to make it easier to give and give them better reasons to give to our candidates and our party," Pryor said.
Both parties credited the other party with helping their candidates.
"We have some Democrats who are in fact Republicans and will support Republican candidates," Daxon said.
Pryor, meanwhile, said many Republicans were strong supporters of Democratic candidates.
"I talked to lots and lots of people who are registered Republicans in this last cycle who just said, 'You know I've always been a Republican, but I'm going to vote for Brad Henry and I'm going to give money.' "
Most agree fundraising dominates any statewide race.
"It takes money to win," Pryor said.
"Conventional wisdom now tells us to win a legislative race you have to raise $200,000 or more, and for a House race $100,000 or more," Pryor said.
House candidates who faced an election opponent and won raised an average of $82,000 for their campaigns, records indicate. In the Senate, the average was $210,000.
That's not to say a candidate can't win a seat in the Legislature by spending less money. Rep. Charles Key, R-Oklahoma City, who won his House seat by beating a primary opponent, raised just $23,375, the least among winning House candidates facing an opponent.
Sen. Constance Johnson, D-Oklahoma City, raised the least amount among winning Senate candidates: $58,711. She won her seat at the primary level, too.
At the other end of the money spectrum is Sen. Sean Burrage, D-Claremore, the top state Senate fundraiser who reported collecting $651,755 during his campaign.
In the House, Speaker Lance Cargill, who did not draw an opponent, reported collecting $445,675 during his campaign. Thad Balkman, who did draw an opponent and lost, collected the second most among House candidates, $246,023.
Pryor said while those who raise the most don't always win their races, it is a key component to winning.
"In a typical race, money really does make a difference, because money can communicate your message to the voters and you have to have that unless you have very high name recognition," Pryor said.
Meanwhile, Oklahoma State University political science professor Jim Davis said there may be at least one other reason why fundraising totals are so close between the two parties despite their disparate registration numbers.
Davis calls certain Democrats in Oklahoma "plums," a term which is reflective of blending blue and red, colors assigned to the two parties by the media.
"They are Democrats, but there is more red color than blue," Davis said.
The so-called plums, unlike the traditional Oklahoma Democrats, are more inclined to back and contribute to Republican candidates in state and national races, Davis said.
Overall, candidates are also able to raise more money because campaigns are getting better at fundraising.
Professional fundraisers, media handlers, public relations experts -- they are all being used more and as a result driving up costs, Davis said.
"They are more expensive than the old party hacks who've done it several times," Davis said. "If you are professionalized and I'm not, all things being equal, you are going to win."
Celebrating Black History Month
The state of Oklahoma has a long and rich history, within which African-Americans have a cemented and important place.
Many African-Americans entered present-day Oklahoma during the Trail of Tears as Indian Slaves. When the Civil War erupted, African-Americans played a significant role in fort-building, fighting, and policing significant boarders from Mexican revolutionaries. After the war ended in 1865, African-Americans were able to live a fairly liberated life in the area that would become Oklahoma in 1907. Encouraged through pamphlets and word-of-mouth, many emancipated slaved joined in Indian land runs. Eventually, African-Americans created twenty-seven all-black towns on ten percent of the Indian Territory. In 1907, when Oklahoma attained statehood, the African-American population was larger than both the Indian and Caucasian populations.
While Oklahoma was never incorporated as an all-black state, African-Americans remain a large part of the state’s history. From the historic “Black Wall Street” on Greenwood Avenue in Tulsa to violent and destructive race riots, Oklahoma has seen a considerable amount of black history play out before its eyes. With this vast history behind us, it is important to reflect on the changes that have taken place, and celebrate the advancements that African-Americans have made within the state of Oklahoma.
One such example of African-American progress can be seen in the life of Jabar Shumate, Representative of District 73 in the Oklahoma House of Representatives.
Born and raised in Tulsa, he attended The University of Oklahoma, where he earned his B.A. in Public Affairs and Administration. After working for his alma mater as a press secretary, Representative Shumate soon found his way into the political spectrum. In July 2004, he was elected into the Oklahoma House of Representatives, where his passion for health issues and education could turn into action. Currently, he sits on the Education, Human Services, and Higher Education and Career Tech Committees, while serving as vice-chair for the Children and Families Committee.
Having lived in Tulsa, being of African-American descent and representing the area in which the former “Black Wall Street” thrived, Representative Shumate has a comprehensive understanding of the importance of Black History Month. He states that in order to reap the benefits of celebrating Black History Month, it is vital to see how black history intersects with the overall context of American history. Recognizing the tumultuous past is necessary to celebrate the success stories of prominent African-American historical figures such as Harriet Tubman, Rosa Parks, and Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Sooner rather than later Jabar Shumate is a name that will undoubtedly be added to the list.
Truly a man of character and honor, Representative Shumate encompasses the attributes that Black History Month seeks to celebrate. Committing himself to his constituents and the overall Oklahoma population, Representative Shumate has made significant progress in educating others about the importance of a healthy lifestyle. Through changing his eating habits and exercise routine, Shumate has shed over sixty pounds and set an example for others to do the same. In addition to these actions, Representative Shumate has taken a stand to educate people about the problems of medical insurance, stating that too many people in the state of Oklahoma “have no insurance, are underinsured, or are uninformed” about the realities of health coverage. He encourages his constituents to see doctors early, and regularly in order to prevent the negative financial and bodily effects of undetected medical problems while he works to create changes in the health care system.
Educational issues are also of the utmost importance to Representative Shumate, as he has supported educational reform and improved standards within his own district. By pushing children of every race and socioeconomic standing in an academic setting, success has been recorded. In fact, it is his firm belief that when public schools take into consideration some of the elements that are used to run charter schools (such as accountability standards), the level of education that children receive better prepares them for post-secondary and career success. When the children of Oklahoma receive premier education, the state experiences phenomenal growth within the economy and the number of individuals that are able to remain within the state, and accomplish career aspirations significantly increases. According to Shumate, young, educated, and talented individuals are the future, and will lead Oklahoma to success in the next one-hundred years of statehood and beyond.
Jabar Shumate is a strong democrat that will be representing District 73 until his term expires in 2016. After that, only time will tell what’s in store for him, although one fact remains sure: Representative Shumate will be continually working to serve the public good through his specialized interest in health and educational advancements state and nationwide. So this month, as you reflect on the importance of Black History Month, take a moment to recognize those political players in your area that are not only embodying the role of proper representation, but proving to be strong leaders for the African-American community.
-Nicole Morgan
The state of Oklahoma has a long and rich history, within which African-Americans have a cemented and important place.
Many African-Americans entered present-day Oklahoma during the Trail of Tears as Indian Slaves. When the Civil War erupted, African-Americans played a significant role in fort-building, fighting, and policing significant boarders from Mexican revolutionaries. After the war ended in 1865, African-Americans were able to live a fairly liberated life in the area that would become Oklahoma in 1907. Encouraged through pamphlets and word-of-mouth, many emancipated slaved joined in Indian land runs. Eventually, African-Americans created twenty-seven all-black towns on ten percent of the Indian Territory. In 1907, when Oklahoma attained statehood, the African-American population was larger than both the Indian and Caucasian populations.
While Oklahoma was never incorporated as an all-black state, African-Americans remain a large part of the state’s history. From the historic “Black Wall Street” on Greenwood Avenue in Tulsa to violent and destructive race riots, Oklahoma has seen a considerable amount of black history play out before its eyes. With this vast history behind us, it is important to reflect on the changes that have taken place, and celebrate the advancements that African-Americans have made within the state of Oklahoma.
One such example of African-American progress can be seen in the life of Jabar Shumate, Representative of District 73 in the Oklahoma House of Representatives.
Born and raised in Tulsa, he attended The University of Oklahoma, where he earned his B.A. in Public Affairs and Administration. After working for his alma mater as a press secretary, Representative Shumate soon found his way into the political spectrum. In July 2004, he was elected into the Oklahoma House of Representatives, where his passion for health issues and education could turn into action. Currently, he sits on the Education, Human Services, and Higher Education and Career Tech Committees, while serving as vice-chair for the Children and Families Committee.
Having lived in Tulsa, being of African-American descent and representing the area in which the former “Black Wall Street” thrived, Representative Shumate has a comprehensive understanding of the importance of Black History Month. He states that in order to reap the benefits of celebrating Black History Month, it is vital to see how black history intersects with the overall context of American history. Recognizing the tumultuous past is necessary to celebrate the success stories of prominent African-American historical figures such as Harriet Tubman, Rosa Parks, and Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Sooner rather than later Jabar Shumate is a name that will undoubtedly be added to the list.
Truly a man of character and honor, Representative Shumate encompasses the attributes that Black History Month seeks to celebrate. Committing himself to his constituents and the overall Oklahoma population, Representative Shumate has made significant progress in educating others about the importance of a healthy lifestyle. Through changing his eating habits and exercise routine, Shumate has shed over sixty pounds and set an example for others to do the same. In addition to these actions, Representative Shumate has taken a stand to educate people about the problems of medical insurance, stating that too many people in the state of Oklahoma “have no insurance, are underinsured, or are uninformed” about the realities of health coverage. He encourages his constituents to see doctors early, and regularly in order to prevent the negative financial and bodily effects of undetected medical problems while he works to create changes in the health care system.
Educational issues are also of the utmost importance to Representative Shumate, as he has supported educational reform and improved standards within his own district. By pushing children of every race and socioeconomic standing in an academic setting, success has been recorded. In fact, it is his firm belief that when public schools take into consideration some of the elements that are used to run charter schools (such as accountability standards), the level of education that children receive better prepares them for post-secondary and career success. When the children of Oklahoma receive premier education, the state experiences phenomenal growth within the economy and the number of individuals that are able to remain within the state, and accomplish career aspirations significantly increases. According to Shumate, young, educated, and talented individuals are the future, and will lead Oklahoma to success in the next one-hundred years of statehood and beyond.
Jabar Shumate is a strong democrat that will be representing District 73 until his term expires in 2016. After that, only time will tell what’s in store for him, although one fact remains sure: Representative Shumate will be continually working to serve the public good through his specialized interest in health and educational advancements state and nationwide. So this month, as you reflect on the importance of Black History Month, take a moment to recognize those political players in your area that are not only embodying the role of proper representation, but proving to be strong leaders for the African-American community.
-Nicole Morgan
SENATE TO HONOR B.J. THOMAS
The State Senate will hear a resolution Wednesday, February 21 recognizing the accomplishments and talent of singing legend B.J. Thomas. The resolution will also proclaim February 21, 2007 as "B.J. Thomas Day."
Senate Resolution 8, authored by Jeff Rabon, will be heard at 1:30 p.m. in the Senate chamber to honor the Oklahoma native.
His vocal repertoire includes rock and roll, country, pop, gospel, and contemporary Christian. To date, Thomas has sold over 70 million records, has had 15 top 40 pop/rock hits, ten top 40 country hits, five Grammys, two Dove awards for Gospel recordings, and 15 Gold and Platinum records. Two of his greatest hits include "Rain Drops Keep Falling on My Head" and "Hooked on a Feeling." He was also the 60th member of the Grand Ole Opry.
Thomas will be attending the event, along with his wife Gloria, and will be available afterwards for photos and autographs in the Senate lounge.
Bush Plan for Iraq is Wrong: Congressman Dan Boren's Speech from the Capital Floor
I rise today in support of our men and women in uniform and in support of this resolution. Nearly 230,000 Americans are currently deployed to the Middle East, fighting the war on terrorism - 3,000 from my home state of Oklahoma. These men and women are fighting for their country not as Democrats or Republicans, but as Americans.
I was not in Congress nearly four years ago when the war in Iraq began. But in the two years I have served here, I have not once encountered a colleague who does not support our troops. We have our disagreements over strategy, spending and even the war itself, but when it comes to support for the selfless Americans serving in uniform we are unanimous. For anyone to suggest anything to the contrary just distracts from this serious debate.
As many of my colleagues have already noted, our troops are not the problem. They have done an outstanding job executing the mission they have been given. The problem is with the administration's strategy. We owe it to the men and women of our Armed Forces to pursue a policy that offers them the best possible chance of success - not a plan that repeats past mistakes.
The president's decision to deploy an additional 21,500 American combat troops to Iraq is not the first time we have sent a "surge" of troops into the conflict. In April of 2004, January and October of 2005, and again in October of last year, we saw temporary escalations that provided no long-term reductions in violence.
I am concerned that this latest plan is a renewed effort for more of the same; that does little to encourage the Iraqis to take responsibility for their own future. As one general told the Iraq Study Group, "all the troops in the world will not provide security if the Iraqi government does not make political progress." Rather than laying out a plan that establishes solid benchmarks for Iraqi security and the corresponding redeployment of U.S. troops, the president is pursuing a strategy that history shows does not work.
Former Secretary of State and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Colin Powell, Commander of U.S. Central Command General John Abizaid, Marine Corps Commandant General James Conway and many other current and former military leaders have said more troops is not the answer.
Our nation's military is already stretched thin. This open-ended plan to increase American troop levels in Iraq would exacerbate the overextension of our armed forces and cripple our ability to respond to other crises around the world. Because we don't know what the future holds, we have to be ready for anything.
U.S. and coalition forces successfully removed Saddam Hussein from power, and the world is a better place for it. But we now find ourselves locked in the middle of an Iraqi civil war. The Iraq of today is vastly different from the Iraq we entered nearly four years ago, yet our strategy remains the same. We need to succeed in Iraq, but we need to redefine what success is.
For over a year now, I have joined Chairman Skelton in his call for solid benchmarks in Iraq. We need a mechanism to measure our progress toward an Iraq that is responsible for its own security. It is in our interest, in Iraq's interest and in the interest of the region to ensure Iraqi personnel are trained and ready to take control sooner rather than later.
Reallocating some of the more than 140,000 troops we already have in Iraq to securing the Iranian border would do more to further our goals in Iraq than sending more Americans into Baghdad.
At the end of the day, military command decisions rest with the commander in chief. This resolution and this debate are not about micromanaging the war, or forcing a withdrawal of troops. Public opinion polls should not dictate war strategy; the facts should. And the facts are that surges haven't worked in the past and experts agree it won't work this time.
The president knows we are all in this together. That's why I was disappointed to see the administration move forward with such a dramatic escalation despite strong, bipartisan opposition in Congress. Without a clear mission or effective benchmarks, it is too big of a gamble to take with so many American lives.
I rise today in support of our men and women in uniform and in support of this resolution. Nearly 230,000 Americans are currently deployed to the Middle East, fighting the war on terrorism - 3,000 from my home state of Oklahoma. These men and women are fighting for their country not as Democrats or Republicans, but as Americans.
I was not in Congress nearly four years ago when the war in Iraq began. But in the two years I have served here, I have not once encountered a colleague who does not support our troops. We have our disagreements over strategy, spending and even the war itself, but when it comes to support for the selfless Americans serving in uniform we are unanimous. For anyone to suggest anything to the contrary just distracts from this serious debate.
As many of my colleagues have already noted, our troops are not the problem. They have done an outstanding job executing the mission they have been given. The problem is with the administration's strategy. We owe it to the men and women of our Armed Forces to pursue a policy that offers them the best possible chance of success - not a plan that repeats past mistakes.
The president's decision to deploy an additional 21,500 American combat troops to Iraq is not the first time we have sent a "surge" of troops into the conflict. In April of 2004, January and October of 2005, and again in October of last year, we saw temporary escalations that provided no long-term reductions in violence.
I am concerned that this latest plan is a renewed effort for more of the same; that does little to encourage the Iraqis to take responsibility for their own future. As one general told the Iraq Study Group, "all the troops in the world will not provide security if the Iraqi government does not make political progress." Rather than laying out a plan that establishes solid benchmarks for Iraqi security and the corresponding redeployment of U.S. troops, the president is pursuing a strategy that history shows does not work.
Former Secretary of State and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Colin Powell, Commander of U.S. Central Command General John Abizaid, Marine Corps Commandant General James Conway and many other current and former military leaders have said more troops is not the answer.
Our nation's military is already stretched thin. This open-ended plan to increase American troop levels in Iraq would exacerbate the overextension of our armed forces and cripple our ability to respond to other crises around the world. Because we don't know what the future holds, we have to be ready for anything.
U.S. and coalition forces successfully removed Saddam Hussein from power, and the world is a better place for it. But we now find ourselves locked in the middle of an Iraqi civil war. The Iraq of today is vastly different from the Iraq we entered nearly four years ago, yet our strategy remains the same. We need to succeed in Iraq, but we need to redefine what success is.
For over a year now, I have joined Chairman Skelton in his call for solid benchmarks in Iraq. We need a mechanism to measure our progress toward an Iraq that is responsible for its own security. It is in our interest, in Iraq's interest and in the interest of the region to ensure Iraqi personnel are trained and ready to take control sooner rather than later.
Reallocating some of the more than 140,000 troops we already have in Iraq to securing the Iranian border would do more to further our goals in Iraq than sending more Americans into Baghdad.
At the end of the day, military command decisions rest with the commander in chief. This resolution and this debate are not about micromanaging the war, or forcing a withdrawal of troops. Public opinion polls should not dictate war strategy; the facts should. And the facts are that surges haven't worked in the past and experts agree it won't work this time.
The president knows we are all in this together. That's why I was disappointed to see the administration move forward with such a dramatic escalation despite strong, bipartisan opposition in Congress. Without a clear mission or effective benchmarks, it is too big of a gamble to take with so many American lives.
Senate Democrats: Funding Oklahoma's Promise
Thanks to the Senate Democrats, lead by Senate President Pro Tempore Mike Morgan, for their efforts to keep our state's promises to our students.
(Oklahoma City) – A measure providing a permanent dedicated funding source for the Oklahoma’s Promise scholarship program was approved by the Senate Finance Committee Tuesday and is headed for the floor of the Oklahoma State Senate.
“This bill will make certain that every student who qualifies for an Oklahoma’s Promise scholarship will receive it,” said Senate President Pro Tempore Mike Morgan, author of the measure. The legislation is part of the 2007 legislative agendas of the Senate Democrats’ and Governor Brad Henry.
Senate Bill 820 requires the Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education to certify the amount needed to fund the program in the coming fiscal year each November. The funds would then be set aside when the State Board of Equalization meets in February.
The measure is patterned after the ROADS program passed by the Legislature in 2006 to boost highway maintenance funding. Unlike the ROADS program, however, Oklahoma’s Promise funding is not limited to revenue from personal income tax. Oklahoma’s Promise funding will simply come from state general revenue, further ensuring that funds will always be available to pay for the scholarships.
Oklahoma’s Promise, originally known as the Oklahoma Higher Learning Access Program, provides scholarships for students who complete a specific college-preparatory curriculum, make good grades and stay out of trouble. Students, whose family income is $50,000 or less, can sign up for the program in the 8th, 9th or 10th grades.
The program began in the early 1990s and has been incredibly successful. Nearly 15,000 students are currently enrolled at Oklahoma colleges and universities on Oklahoma’s Promise scholarships. The program’s annual cost has grown to nearly $40 million is projected to reach nearly $60 million by Fiscal Year 2009.
“These students take personal responsibility for their future. They make a promise to the state that they will prepare themselves for college and the state, in turn, promises to provide them with a college education. This legislation will ensure that the state keeps its end of the bargain,” Morgan said.
Thanks to the Senate Democrats, lead by Senate President Pro Tempore Mike Morgan, for their efforts to keep our state's promises to our students.
(Oklahoma City) – A measure providing a permanent dedicated funding source for the Oklahoma’s Promise scholarship program was approved by the Senate Finance Committee Tuesday and is headed for the floor of the Oklahoma State Senate.
“This bill will make certain that every student who qualifies for an Oklahoma’s Promise scholarship will receive it,” said Senate President Pro Tempore Mike Morgan, author of the measure. The legislation is part of the 2007 legislative agendas of the Senate Democrats’ and Governor Brad Henry.
Senate Bill 820 requires the Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education to certify the amount needed to fund the program in the coming fiscal year each November. The funds would then be set aside when the State Board of Equalization meets in February.
The measure is patterned after the ROADS program passed by the Legislature in 2006 to boost highway maintenance funding. Unlike the ROADS program, however, Oklahoma’s Promise funding is not limited to revenue from personal income tax. Oklahoma’s Promise funding will simply come from state general revenue, further ensuring that funds will always be available to pay for the scholarships.
Oklahoma’s Promise, originally known as the Oklahoma Higher Learning Access Program, provides scholarships for students who complete a specific college-preparatory curriculum, make good grades and stay out of trouble. Students, whose family income is $50,000 or less, can sign up for the program in the 8th, 9th or 10th grades.
The program began in the early 1990s and has been incredibly successful. Nearly 15,000 students are currently enrolled at Oklahoma colleges and universities on Oklahoma’s Promise scholarships. The program’s annual cost has grown to nearly $40 million is projected to reach nearly $60 million by Fiscal Year 2009.
“These students take personal responsibility for their future. They make a promise to the state that they will prepare themselves for college and the state, in turn, promises to provide them with a college education. This legislation will ensure that the state keeps its end of the bargain,” Morgan said.
Hamilton, Johnson Author Darfur Legislation; State Law Would Target Darfur Genocide
State government would be prevented from indirectly funding the genocide in Darfur under legislation filed by state Rep. Rebecca Hamilton. House Bill 1900, by Hamilton and state Sen. Constance Johnson (D-Oklahoma City), would not allow companies doing business with the Darfur region of western Sudan to receive state contracts "for so long as genocide continues within that region."
"I don't believe that the people of Oklahoma should have their tax dollars used to indirectly subsidize a war on unarmed civilians by a modern army that engages in slavery, mass rape and genocide," said Hamilton, D-Oklahoma City. "These are crimes against all humanity and the government that commits them is supported and funded, at least in part, by businesses who underwrite them with their commerce. Oklahomans might not be able to directly intervene, but we can say no to letting our money be used to aid those who aid the murderers."
According to Amnesty International, hundreds of thousands of people have lost their lives in Darfur since February 2003. The Sudanese government and government-backed Janjawid militia are accused of committing systematic human rights abuses including killing, torture, rape, looting and destruction of property.
"This genocide is one of the most egregious examples of crimes against humanity in the world today," Hamilton said."It involves full-scale war on unarmed civilians who are rounded up; put in camps; systematically starved, raped, beaten; sold into slavery and murdered. The genocide involves every evil that people perpetrate against one another, all in one spot.
"Unfortunately, the international community's reaction to this horror has been limited to self-righteous hand-wringing. The release of the Microsoft's latest operating system for personal computers has received more attention than we have given to the systematic murder of millions of innocent men, women and children in Darfur. It's time we begin forcing those who perpetuate genocide to pay a price. House Bill 1900 is a small step in that direction."
News You Can Use
On Presidents Day yesterday I bought a book on blogging and podcasting.
All of the presidential campaigns are using blogs and podcasts to expand their reach into the virtual internet world of voters and contributors. The times, they are changing.
In Oklahoma, many of our Democratic candidates are using websites and some have added blogs and podcasting to their campaign strategies. They are also using online fundraising, as is the Oklahoma Democratic Party. Click here to donate to the ODP.
I hope to add podcasting to the ODP website and/or this blog soon.
Providing news and commentary about activity related to the party and our elected officials and current issues is a primary role of our communications director at the ODP. But why let him have all of the fun? So, I added this blog last year to provide a quick way to push out news and views of all of our state officers and HQ taff. Our regular readers will notice the different voices we have on the site, we'd like to include yours too, so, please, leave your comments, but do let us know who you are.
We all have our regular news sources, I regularly read the Washington Post, NY Times, Oklahoman and Tulsa World. For local news I read my hometown paper the Norman Transcript and I still read the Hobart Democrat-Chief too! I also read Daily Kos, MyDD, Crooks and Liars, the Hill Blog, the DNC Blog and a variety of other national blogs. I know Ben reads others, as do Jason, Teresa, Courtney and Lindsey.
And, yes, I also read the news and gossip at www.demookie.com.
(If you have a favorite blog that regularly posts news of interest to Oklahoma Democrats, leave a comment here promoting your favorites.)
On Presidents Day yesterday I bought a book on blogging and podcasting.
All of the presidential campaigns are using blogs and podcasts to expand their reach into the virtual internet world of voters and contributors. The times, they are changing.
In Oklahoma, many of our Democratic candidates are using websites and some have added blogs and podcasting to their campaign strategies. They are also using online fundraising, as is the Oklahoma Democratic Party. Click here to donate to the ODP.
I hope to add podcasting to the ODP website and/or this blog soon.
Providing news and commentary about activity related to the party and our elected officials and current issues is a primary role of our communications director at the ODP. But why let him have all of the fun? So, I added this blog last year to provide a quick way to push out news and views of all of our state officers and HQ taff. Our regular readers will notice the different voices we have on the site, we'd like to include yours too, so, please, leave your comments, but do let us know who you are.
We all have our regular news sources, I regularly read the Washington Post, NY Times, Oklahoman and Tulsa World. For local news I read my hometown paper the Norman Transcript and I still read the Hobart Democrat-Chief too! I also read Daily Kos, MyDD, Crooks and Liars, the Hill Blog, the DNC Blog and a variety of other national blogs. I know Ben reads others, as do Jason, Teresa, Courtney and Lindsey.
And, yes, I also read the news and gossip at www.demookie.com.
(If you have a favorite blog that regularly posts news of interest to Oklahoma Democrats, leave a comment here promoting your favorites.)
OK Insider
I regularly read the news at www.okinsider.com. Their reporters file detailed stories daily from committee meetings at the capitol that often don't show up anywhere else.
An example is the very informative report filed yesterday by Shawn Ashley about the Human Rights Commission and the Indian Affairs Commission.
Oklahoma Democrats are very interested in the work of both of these commissions. Thanks okinsider for your work to inform Oklahoma's citizens about our government!
Classy
I attended a re-election campaign fundraiser for State Rep. Al McAffrey last night at his home in Oklahoma City. The event was classy and the host was gracious. From the large front porch welcome to the artfully appointed home and refreshments the event was a tribute to good taste and hospitality. The citizens of HD88 made an excellent choice when they elected Al McAffrey. His personal attention to people, to details, and to issues that matter is remarkable --- good luck Al!
(I especially enjoyed visiting with Richard and Carol Ruth, Mandy Winton, Rep. Terry Harrison, Rep. Jabar Shumate, and Judy Calhoun. I saw Lynn Green, Chuck Allen, Ellen Stevens, Jane Luttrell, Linda Gray Murphy, Jim Nimmo, Steve Van Hook, Rep. Rebecca Hamilton, Rep. Danny Morgan, Rep. Ken Luttrell, and Rep. Eric Proctor just to name a few. The first floor of the 3-story Mesta Park home was packed with legislators, supporters, and friends --- one of the best attended events of this session.)
I attended a re-election campaign fundraiser for State Rep. Al McAffrey last night at his home in Oklahoma City. The event was classy and the host was gracious. From the large front porch welcome to the artfully appointed home and refreshments the event was a tribute to good taste and hospitality. The citizens of HD88 made an excellent choice when they elected Al McAffrey. His personal attention to people, to details, and to issues that matter is remarkable --- good luck Al!
(I especially enjoyed visiting with Richard and Carol Ruth, Mandy Winton, Rep. Terry Harrison, Rep. Jabar Shumate, and Judy Calhoun. I saw Lynn Green, Chuck Allen, Ellen Stevens, Jane Luttrell, Linda Gray Murphy, Jim Nimmo, Steve Van Hook, Rep. Rebecca Hamilton, Rep. Danny Morgan, Rep. Ken Luttrell, and Rep. Eric Proctor just to name a few. The first floor of the 3-story Mesta Park home was packed with legislators, supporters, and friends --- one of the best attended events of this session.)
Show us the money
Today the State Equalization Board meets at 10 a.m in the Governor's Large Conference Room at the State Capitol.
The board is charged with certifying amounts of all revenues available for legislative appropriation in a given year. It meets in February to update revenue estimates and finalize the Legislature's appropriation authority.
* The Equalization Board consists of the Governor, Lieutenant Governor, Attorney General, State Treasurer, State Auditor and Inspector, State Superintendent of Public Instruction, and President of the Agriculture Board. The Office of State Finance staffs the board with support provided by the Oklahoma Tax Commission.
Today the State Equalization Board meets at 10 a.m in the Governor's Large Conference Room at the State Capitol.
The board is charged with certifying amounts of all revenues available for legislative appropriation in a given year. It meets in February to update revenue estimates and finalize the Legislature's appropriation authority.
* The Equalization Board consists of the Governor, Lieutenant Governor, Attorney General, State Treasurer, State Auditor and Inspector, State Superintendent of Public Instruction, and President of the Agriculture Board. The Office of State Finance staffs the board with support provided by the Oklahoma Tax Commission.
Monday, February 19, 2007
2007 ODP State Convention Rules Committee
The following individuals were approved by the ODP State Central Committee on Saturday, Feb. 17, to serve as the Rules Committee for the 2007 ODP State Convention:
Gordon Melson (Chair), Dave Ratcliff, Rae Weese, Rep. Mike Brown, Cerita Morley, Jody Harlan, Sen. Tom IVester, Mike Weddington, Laura Boyd, Rep. Anastasia Pittman, Debbie Thompson, Kevin Cameron, Rhonda Rudd, Rep. Joe Dorman, Sen. Debbe Leftwich, and Margaret Phillips.
The following individuals were approved by the ODP State Central Committee on Saturday, Feb. 17, to serve as the Rules Committee for the 2007 ODP State Convention:
Gordon Melson (Chair), Dave Ratcliff, Rae Weese, Rep. Mike Brown, Cerita Morley, Jody Harlan, Sen. Tom IVester, Mike Weddington, Laura Boyd, Rep. Anastasia Pittman, Debbie Thompson, Kevin Cameron, Rhonda Rudd, Rep. Joe Dorman, Sen. Debbe Leftwich, and Margaret Phillips.
ODP State Convention 2007 Credentials Committee
The following individuals were approved by the State Central Committee on Feb. 17 at the ODP HQ to serve as the Credentials Committee for the 2007 State Convention in May.
Vickie Williams (Chair), Jack Boyte, Darla Howe-Pierce, Freida Wilcox, Sen. Jim Wilson, Gene Moses, Juanita King, Linda Wade, Brent Wilcox, James Baggett, Lillie Buckner, Rose Ann Jenny, Mark Floyd, Victor Gorin, Enda Brookfield, and Jauntia Sykes-Vasquez.
The following individuals were approved by the State Central Committee on Feb. 17 at the ODP HQ to serve as the Credentials Committee for the 2007 State Convention in May.
Vickie Williams (Chair), Jack Boyte, Darla Howe-Pierce, Freida Wilcox, Sen. Jim Wilson, Gene Moses, Juanita King, Linda Wade, Brent Wilcox, James Baggett, Lillie Buckner, Rose Ann Jenny, Mark Floyd, Victor Gorin, Enda Brookfield, and Jauntia Sykes-Vasquez.
ODP State Convention 2007 Resolutions Committee
At its meeting Saturday at the ODP HQ, the ODP State Central Committee approved the following members for the ODP State Convention 2007 Resolutions Committee:
Sen. Cal Hobson (chair), Demetrius Bereolus, Martha Hardwick, Elaine Dodd, Cheno Kennedy, Pat Frank, Hugh Graham, Kathy Houston, Rep. Ryan McMullen, Billye Van Schuyber, Sandra Rose, Vicky Langford, Rep. Ryan Kiesel, Christie Breedlove, Kathy North, Kevin Cameron, Karen Parsons, James Nimmo, Carl Downing, Ed Romo, Jim Davis, Don Faulkner, Sen. Paul Muegge, and Carol Ruth.
At its meeting Saturday at the ODP HQ, the ODP State Central Committee approved the following members for the ODP State Convention 2007 Resolutions Committee:
Sen. Cal Hobson (chair), Demetrius Bereolus, Martha Hardwick, Elaine Dodd, Cheno Kennedy, Pat Frank, Hugh Graham, Kathy Houston, Rep. Ryan McMullen, Billye Van Schuyber, Sandra Rose, Vicky Langford, Rep. Ryan Kiesel, Christie Breedlove, Kathy North, Kevin Cameron, Karen Parsons, James Nimmo, Carl Downing, Ed Romo, Jim Davis, Don Faulkner, Sen. Paul Muegge, and Carol Ruth.
Writing Resolutions
(The following was provided by Walter Jenny, Jr. as a guide to the resolution writing process for upcoming precinct, county, district and state conventions for the Oklahoma Democratic Party.)
(The following was provided by Walter Jenny, Jr. as a guide to the resolution writing process for upcoming precinct, county, district and state conventions for the Oklahoma Democratic Party.)
Parliamentary bodies express themselves by adopting resolutions. While a convention’s delegates may have many different opinions, it is only when they resolve those thoughts into a single resolution that the body (by majority vote) speaks with one voice. A body acts through the adoption of a motion. Under parliamentary procedure, a resolution is a main motion that may be amended, tabled or otherwise dealt with by the convention or body.
Resolutions may be simple or complex. A complex resolution may include one or more “Whereas” clauses to make arguments in favor of adoption of the resolution. These clauses make up what is called the preamble. Or, the resolution may be so simple that the resolution just needs to be stated. A preamble should not contain a period, but each paragraph or clause should close with a comma or semicolon, followed by "and," except for the last paragraph of the preamble. A resolution should avoid periods where practicable. The paragraphs of the resolution are often numbered, making it easier for the body to discuss and consider amendments to the resolution.
Resolutions generally either encourage that some specific action should be taken, or they are expressions of the opinions of the body. Below are two resolutions that illustrate the two different kinds of resolutions. They were adopted by the Democratic National Committee Resolutions Committee at its meeting on February 1, 2007.
Resolution Supporting Energy Independence and a Clean, Healthy Environment
WHEREAS, Democrats strongly support measures that promote energy security and a safe, clean environment by reducing our dependence on oil, eliminating billions in tax breaks for big oil companies, and increasing research and development into clean renewable energy and efficiency technologies; and
WHEREAS, energy independence can be achieved by innovation, diversifying energy sources, creating energy efficient products, and promoting conservation measures; and
WHEREAS, energy independence will create a new energy industry that creates jobs and stimulates economic growth; and
WHEREAS, America must have a 21st century transportation system and infrastructure, which includes investments in mass transit, alternative energy technology, and protection of America’s critical infrastructure; and
WHEREAS, President Bush and Republicans in Congress have saddled Americans with record gas prices, dependence on oil and an energy policy written by and for big oil;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Democratic National Committee supports Democratic elected officials in Congress and in states and local communities across the country who are working toward energy independence, security and diversity as well as a safe, clean environment.
Notice that the resolution has three main components:
- a title that simply states what the resolution is about;
- a preamble with one or more clauses that make the argument in favor of the resolution; and
- the resolve, which expresses or “resolves” the view of the body in one or more paragraphs written in a single sentence.
The second resolution, passed by the Democratic National Committee at its meeting on February 3, 2007 is an expression of the views of the body.
Resolution Commending Governor Howard Dean for Instituting the “50 State Strategy” at the DNC
WHEREAS, Governor Howard Dean is Chairman of the Democratic National Committee (DNC), duly elected by members of the Democratic National Committee; and
WHEREAS, Governor Dean has implemented a “50 State Strategy” that has been instrumental in helping to ensure State Democratic Parties have the tools, training, and resources needed to win elections up and down the ticket, in all parts of the country; and
WHEREAS, previously too many of our state parties had been neglected by the national party even as Republicans did a far better job of effectively organizing their State parties, and the “50 State Strategy” reversed that trend and provided State Democratic Parties the tools, resources, and infrastructure needed to compete and win races in all parts of the country; and
WHEREAS, the 2006 elections demonstrated that if Democrats show up, stand up for what we believe in and work hard and ask every American for their vote, we can win in any part of the country at every level; and
WHEREAS, the “50 State Strategy” ensured that State Democratic Parties were able to lay the groundwork that enabled Democratic candidates to take advantage of a favorable political climate; and
WHEREAS, thanks in great part to the “50 State Strategy,” Democratic candidates won races up and down the ticket, all across the country that they would not have been able to win, helping take back the U.S. House and Senate, elect a majority of Democratic governors – who now govern states that control 295 electoral votes – and win ten new Democratic majorities in state legislatures;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Association of State Democratic Chairs (ASDC) and the DNC honor and thank Governor Dean for his tireless commitment to State Democratic Parties and the “50 State Strategy,” and for holding himself to the highest ethical standards, and for never retreating from what was right for every Democrat in every state; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the “50 State Strategy” is a long term investment paying immediate dividends and that, as we look toward the future, State Democratic Parties will evaluate and enhance these efforts, to grow our majority and sustain Americans' trust in and support for us; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that DNC and our State Parties will continue working hard to show up and ask for people's votes in every corner of America to ensure Democratic victories next November, to take back the White House in 2008, and to continue to rebuild the Democratic Party for the future.
The body may debate and amend, delete or add any clauses of the preamble or resolves as they see fit. Sometimes if a resolve is deleted, it is appropriate to delete the preamble that related to that paragraph for the final resolution to make any sense. Any amendment must be germane to the subject of the resolution; if it is not, it should be in an entirely separate resolution.
The Resolutions Committee of the State Democratic Party Convention has four tasks:
- To review resolutions proposed to the Convention;
- To propose resolutions on the initiative of the Committee members;
- To revise and draft resolutions, and
- To recommend the adoption of resolutions in its report to the Convention.
ODP Bylaws, Section 9(C). As a result, it is possible that a resolution adopted by a precinct, county or congressional district convention may be changed by the Resolutions Committee, often in an attempt to reach a consensus or middle ground that is more likely to reflect the views of most of the members of the body. But the convention has the final authority to change the language again; it is not bound by the recommendation of the Resolutions Committee.
Affirmation Action Committee Members for DNC National Convention Delegate Selection Plan
The following individuals were identified and approved by the State Central Committee, as a whole, on Saturday, Feb. 17, 2007 as members of the ODP Affirmative Action Committee for the 2008 Democratic National Convention Delegate Selection Plan. Some of the individuals currently serve on the ODP Affirmative Action committee for the State. These appointments are for the purpose of monitoring the ODP's Affirmative Action plan as it relates directly to the 2008 National Convention Delegate Selection Plan.
Diane Anderson, Sue Barton, Rep. Sott BigHorse, Edna Brookfield, Lillie Buckner, Philip Busey, Jason Campbell, Cara Cowan-Watts, Cissie Crusoe, Louise Darrington, Carl Downing, Sen. Judy Eason-McIntyre, Lois Felder, Kalyn Free, Chris Gentges, Todd Goodman, Danny Goodwin, Margo Gray, Alan Harder, Matt Harney, Earl Hatley, Marcus Hayes, Teresa Hill, Drista Hodges-Eckhoff, Rep. Chuck Hoskin, Dana Jim, Sue Johnson, Ed Kerns, Sebastian Lantos, Robert Mayes, Al McAffrey, Earl Mitchell, Bernice Mitchell, Allen Moss, James Nimmo, Karen Parsons, Rep. Anastasia Pittman, Rev. John A. Reed, Jr., Wilfredo Rivera, Ed Romo, Rep. Jabar Shumate, Brant Solomon, Sen. John Sparks, Juanita Sykes-Vasquez, Jacquelyn Thomas, Speaker George Tiger, DAvid Wilson, and Angela Wilson.
The following individuals were identified and approved by the State Central Committee, as a whole, on Saturday, Feb. 17, 2007 as members of the ODP Affirmative Action Committee for the 2008 Democratic National Convention Delegate Selection Plan. Some of the individuals currently serve on the ODP Affirmative Action committee for the State. These appointments are for the purpose of monitoring the ODP's Affirmative Action plan as it relates directly to the 2008 National Convention Delegate Selection Plan.
Diane Anderson, Sue Barton, Rep. Sott BigHorse, Edna Brookfield, Lillie Buckner, Philip Busey, Jason Campbell, Cara Cowan-Watts, Cissie Crusoe, Louise Darrington, Carl Downing, Sen. Judy Eason-McIntyre, Lois Felder, Kalyn Free, Chris Gentges, Todd Goodman, Danny Goodwin, Margo Gray, Alan Harder, Matt Harney, Earl Hatley, Marcus Hayes, Teresa Hill, Drista Hodges-Eckhoff, Rep. Chuck Hoskin, Dana Jim, Sue Johnson, Ed Kerns, Sebastian Lantos, Robert Mayes, Al McAffrey, Earl Mitchell, Bernice Mitchell, Allen Moss, James Nimmo, Karen Parsons, Rep. Anastasia Pittman, Rev. John A. Reed, Jr., Wilfredo Rivera, Ed Romo, Rep. Jabar Shumate, Brant Solomon, Sen. John Sparks, Juanita Sykes-Vasquez, Jacquelyn Thomas, Speaker George Tiger, DAvid Wilson, and Angela Wilson.
Tentative Agenda for the 2007 Oklahoma Democratic Party State Convention
The ODP State Central Committee approved the following tentative agenda for the May 2007 convention in Oklahoma City. That agenda is set according to the recommended rules for conventions and meetings outlined in the ODP Bylaws.
The ODP State Central Committee approved the following tentative agenda for the May 2007 convention in Oklahoma City. That agenda is set according to the recommended rules for conventions and meetings outlined in the ODP Bylaws.
TENTATIVE
2007
FRIDAY May 18
5 to 7 p.m. Early Registration/Credentialing Renaissance Hotel Lobby
7 to 10 p.m. ODP Celebrates
Music by Heart and Soul Meeting Room 9
Light Appetizers Provided and Cash Bar
8 to 11 p.m. Candidate and Caucus Hospitality Suites TBD
SATURDAY, May 19
8 to 9 a.m. Registration/Credentialing
GENERAL SESSION 1
9 – 10 a.m. Call to Order and Welcome - Chair
Pledge of Allegiance
Invocation
Recognition of Democratic Elected Officials - Chair
Keynote Address(es)
Comments from the Chair
Treasurer’s Report
10 a.m. Report of the Credentials Committee
Report of the Rules Committee
10:15 to Noon Election of Officers
Chair, Vice-Chair, Secretary, Treasurer
Noon Sponsored Box Lunch and Speaker
1 – 4:30 p.m Continue Election of Officers and 4 Affirmative Action Committee Members
Report of the Resolutions Committee
4:30 p.m. Adjourn General Session 1
6 – 7 p.m. Private Reception for Event Sponsors Renaissance Hotel Suite
6 – 7 p.m. Open Reception for Activists Hall of Fame
(cash bar) Meeting Room 9-12
7 -9:30 p.m. Activists Hall of Fame Dinner and Awards Ceremony Meeting Room 9-12
(tickets available for sale)
SUNDAY, May 21
8 – 9 a.m. Registration/Credentialing
8 – 9 a.m. Non-denominational worship service
GENERAL SESSION 2
9 a.m. – Noon Consideration of Resolutions
Additional Business
Announcements
Possible Presidential Candidate Appearance
Noon Adjournment
Presidents Day
It's clear that GWB is trying to edge out James Buchanan for the worst president ever. Sen. Harry Reid's statement that Bush's war in Iraq is the "worst foreign policy mistake" in U.S. history is not what a president wants to hear as his term winds down. The American people are very eager for the end of his term and the end of his war.
He should carefully listen to his own speech today at Mount Vernon and seriously study the mistakes of his other predecessors so as not to further jeapordize our global reputation and damage our economy.
It's clear that GWB is trying to edge out James Buchanan for the worst president ever. Sen. Harry Reid's statement that Bush's war in Iraq is the "worst foreign policy mistake" in U.S. history is not what a president wants to hear as his term winds down. The American people are very eager for the end of his term and the end of his war.
He should carefully listen to his own speech today at Mount Vernon and seriously study the mistakes of his other predecessors so as not to further jeapordize our global reputation and damage our economy.
ODP Closed Today for Presidents Day
As a reminder, the ODP office is closed today for Presidents Day.
If you have an emergency please leave a voicemail message at 405.427.3366 or email me at lisapryor@okdemocrats.org.
Our regular office hours are 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. M-F. In addition our office is available for Democratic Party related activities on Tuesday and Thursday nights and two Saturdays each month. To schedule a meeting at the ODP HQ contact Lindsey Cox Coster at lcox@okdemocrats.org or call our office at 405.427.3366.
Please check our calendar regularly for updates to events in your area.
As a reminder, the ODP office is closed today for Presidents Day.
If you have an emergency please leave a voicemail message at 405.427.3366 or email me at lisapryor@okdemocrats.org.
Our regular office hours are 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. M-F. In addition our office is available for Democratic Party related activities on Tuesday and Thursday nights and two Saturdays each month. To schedule a meeting at the ODP HQ contact Lindsey Cox Coster at lcox@okdemocrats.org or call our office at 405.427.3366.
Please check our calendar regularly for updates to events in your area.
Sunday, February 18, 2007
Municipal Elections
In keeping with the adage that "all politics is local" I want to report that Norman Republican mayor candidate Trey Bates was in our neighborhood campaigning today.
His pitch included asking residents to pray for him as he touted his close relationship with the senior pastor at a local megachurch Journey Church. He admitted that he has had little to no experience with political campaigns and was reportedly uneasy when questioned about his qualifications to serve as mayor. (He didn't stop by my house, I have a sign for his opponent in my front yard.)
Norman City Councilwoman Cindy Rosenthal, a registered Democrat and a well respected OU political science professor and director of the Carl Albert Center for Congressional Studies and director of the N.E.W. Leadership Program is also campaigning in the area -- her theme is Proven Leadership No Strings Attached. Rosenthal announced her candidacy in December.
The non-partisan mayor's election in Norman is set for March 6th.
Last year Tulsa elected Kathy Taylor, a registered Democrat, as mayor of the state's second largest city in a non-partisan race.
Norman has had only one female mayor -- some 50 years ago.
DNC Chairman Howard Dean has placed an emphasis on "down ballot" and municipal elections across the nation through the 50-State Strategy in an effort to build a stronger "bench" for state legislatures.
Creek County Democratic Party Hosts BBQ
(This report and photo are from the Sapulpa Daily Herald. Pictured at right are Lt. Gov. Jari Askins, Cynthia Holtwick, and Labor Commissioner Lloyd Fields. )
By BOB SHERRILL
Herald Staff Writer
State Democratic heavyweights came to Sapulpa Friday night for a barbecue dinner and an old-fashioned political rally at the Creek County Fairgrounds.
Oklahoma Lt. Gov. Jari Askins told the group the state government would be running more efficient now since both the governor and lieutenant governor were both Democrats.
She said currently the State Senate had been struggling with reorganizing committees because of the 50-50 split between Republicans and Democrats in the upper house.
Earlier in the evening, Danny Morgan, Sate Democrat Minority Leader in the House of Representatives told the group that his party had put together a list of major commitments to five key areas.
He said these areas included access to affordable healthcare and prescription drugs, education, economy, safe communities for children and responsible government that included ethics reform.
Askins said state voters should keep in mind these key areas of concern are a foundation to build a better Oklahoma.
Also in attendance were State Sen. Nancy Riley, Oklahoma Labor Commissioner Lloyd Fields and Ben Odom, co-chairman of the State Democratic Party, who acted as master of ceremonies.
Creek County Assessor Cynthia Holtwick, substituting for Willene Wright, Creek County Democratic Chairman, officially greeted the group.
Wright is recovering from surgery on her arm.
Congratulations to OK County Democrats
Congratulations to OK County Democratic Party officers Kitti Asberry, Ron Wasson, and Lynn Green for a great event last night --- their annual Medallion Dinner.
The event, themed "Oklahoma Democratic Women Bold Leaders Bright Future" was keynoted by Democratic Lt. Gov. Jari Askins.
Honored as the OK County Volunteer of the Year was James Baggett.
Honored as the OK County Young Democrat of the Year was Jennifer Seal.
I was delighted to be seated at the main table with Lt. Gov. Askins, Senators Debbe Leftwich and Connie Johnson; Representative Anastasia Pittman, OFDW President Ruby Taylor, and YDO President Mandy Winton.
Other elected officials attending included former Senator Bernest Cain, Rep. Rebecca Hamilton, Rep. Al McAffrey, Rep. Ryan McMullen, Rep. Richard Morrissette and Rep. Mike Shelton.
OK County Democrat Bob Lemon was a premier sponsor of the event that drew at least 300 local and state Democrats.
Congratulations to OK County Democratic Party officers Kitti Asberry, Ron Wasson, and Lynn Green for a great event last night --- their annual Medallion Dinner.
The event, themed "Oklahoma Democratic Women Bold Leaders Bright Future" was keynoted by Democratic Lt. Gov. Jari Askins.
Honored as the OK County Volunteer of the Year was James Baggett.
Honored as the OK County Young Democrat of the Year was Jennifer Seal.
I was delighted to be seated at the main table with Lt. Gov. Askins, Senators Debbe Leftwich and Connie Johnson; Representative Anastasia Pittman, OFDW President Ruby Taylor, and YDO President Mandy Winton.
Other elected officials attending included former Senator Bernest Cain, Rep. Rebecca Hamilton, Rep. Al McAffrey, Rep. Ryan McMullen, Rep. Richard Morrissette and Rep. Mike Shelton.
OK County Democrat Bob Lemon was a premier sponsor of the event that drew at least 300 local and state Democrats.
OK Democrats edge out GOP donors
(The Tulsa World ran a story today on 2006 campaign dollars that's worth reading as we work toward the 2008 election cycle ---- it's time for Democrats to grow from good to great in 2008, in all facets of our Democratic Party work.)
By CURTIS KILLMAN World Staff Writer
2/18/2007
While Democrats hold an 11 percent edge over Republicans in state voter registration, the two parties were neck and neck in candidate fundraising during the 2006 campaign, a Tulsa World analysis of records shows.
Democratic candidates raised a collective $20.3 million for all their statewide campaigns, edging out Republicans, who raised $19.8 million.
In all, state political candidates, including nonpartisan and independent candidates, raised a collective $43 million for their 2006 campaigns.
A Democratic party spokeswoman said the numbers reflect improved fundraising methods.
"We are getting a lot better at strategic fundraising than we have been in the past, I believe," state Democratic Party Chairwoman Lisa Pryor said, noting that "Republicans typically have deeper pockets in Oklahoma."
Democratic candidates raised an average of $114,000 for each of the 178 who reported active fundraising campaigns.
Republicans, meanwhile, raised an average of $117,000 for each of the 169 GOP candidates. The totals do not include revenues carried forward from previous campaigns.
State GOP Chairman Tom Daxon said the small funding difference between the parties indicates his party is on the upswing.
"I suspect those numbers would have been skewed heavily toward the Democrats 15 or 20 years ago," Daxon said.
Suggestions that the state Republican Party has deep pockets is "hogwash," Daxon said.
"By and large, the heart of our support is as always small-business people, retired people, just ordinary people who are trying to support a family," Daxon said.
Overall, the House of Representatives candidates collected the most money among state office seekers.
The 223 House candidates raised about $9.1 million during the campaign. The race for governor attracted the second most, with about $8.2 million going toward the five candidates.
State Senate candidates raised the third most, with $7.9 million reported by 61 candidates.
A hotly contested lieutenant governor's race, which attracted eight candidates, saw a total of $5.3 million flow into their respective campaign bank accounts.
Also, the political party that won or controlled the various offices outcollected its counterpart in all but two cases, the World's analysis found.
Democrats outraised and won or maintained control of the state Senate, governor, attorney general, auditor and inspector, insurance commissioner, labor commissioner and superintendent of public instruction posts.
Republicans, meanwhile, outraised and maintained their majority control of the state House of Representatives. The only exception to the rule was in the state treasurer and lieutenant governor races, where Republican candidates raised the most money collectively among their candidates, but lost to Democrats.
"The election was a disaster for the Republicans nationally, but in Oklahoma we held our ground," Daxon said. "To be able to do that and not have an edge in funding indicates that we have some things going on from an organizational standpoint that helped us in this election, especially in the midst of a terrible national climate."
Pryor said Democrats have stepped up what she described as targeted fundraising efforts. The strategy includes using analysis of past voter records and campaign donations to pinpoint those most likely to give.
"I think Democrats are getting better at our fundraising appeals," Pryor said. "We're asking more people to give more often."
Democrats are also using the Internet to appeal for contributions on a quarterly basis, she said.
"We're just trying to make it easier to give and give them better reasons to give to our candidates and our party," Pryor said.
Both parties credited the other party with helping their candidates.
"We have some Democrats who are in fact Republicans and will support Republican candidates," Daxon said.
Pryor, meanwhile, said many Republicans were strong supporters of Democratic candidates.
"I talked to lots and lots of people who are registered Republicans in this last cycle who just said, 'You know I've always been a Republican, but I'm going to vote for Brad Henry and I'm going to give money.' "
Most agree fundraising dominates any statewide race.
"It takes money to win," Pryor said.
"Conventional wisdom now tells us to win a legislative race you have to raise $200,000 or more, and for a House race $100,000 or more," Pryor said.
House candidates who faced an election opponent and won raised an average of $82,000 for their campaigns, records indicate. In the Senate, the average was $210,000.
That's not to say a candidate can't win a seat in the Legislature by spending less money. Rep. Charles Key, R-Oklahoma City, who won his House seat by beating a primary opponent, raised just $23,375, the least among winning House candidates facing an opponent.
Sen. Constance Johnson, D-Oklahoma City, raised the least amount among winning Senate candidates: $58,711. She won her seat at the primary level, too.
At the other end of the money spectrum is Sen. Sean Burrage, D-Claremore, the top state Senate fundraiser who reported collecting $651,755 during his campaign.
In the House, Speaker Lance Cargill, who did not draw an opponent, reported collecting $445,675 during his campaign. Thad Balkman, who did draw an opponent and lost, collected the second most among House candidates, $246,023.
Pryor said while those who raise the most don't always win their races, it is a key component to winning.
"In a typical race, money really does make a difference, because money can communicate your message to the voters and you have to have that unless you have very high name recognition," Pryor said.
Meanwhile, Oklahoma State University political science professor Jim Davis said there may be at least one other reason why fundraising totals are so close between the two parties despite their disparate registration numbers.
Davis calls certain Democrats in Oklahoma "plums," a term which is reflective of blending blue and red, colors assigned to the two parties by the media.
"They are Democrats, but there is more red color than blue," Davis said.
The so-called plums, unlike the traditional Oklahoma Democrats, are more inclined to back and contribute to Republican candidates in state and national races, Davis said.
Overall, candidates are also able to raise more money because campaigns are getting better at fundraising.
Professional fundraisers, media handlers, public relations experts -- they are all being used more and as a result driving up costs, Davis said.
"They are more expensive than the old party hacks who've done it several times," Davis said. "If you are professionalized and I'm not, all things being equal, you are going to win."
Curtis Killman 581-8471
curtis.killman@tulsaworld.com
Support State Rep. Al McAffrey
You are invited to support the re-election of State Rep. Al McAffrey at an event in his home tomorrow evening from 5:30 to 8 p.m., 720 NW 16th St., OKC.
McAffrey is already proving to be a strong advocate of health care and education issues and will likely be a respected and effective leader in the freshman legislative class.
A US Navy veteran and member of the Choctaw Tribe, McAffrey has been a police officer and funeral director. He has three children and four grandchildren.
He's Done It Again
And now ladies and gentlemen, it's time for the latest episode of "Randy Terrill: Fact or Fiction?"
State Rep. Randy Terrill, R-Moore, has done it again; making claims that just aren't true. The most recent is his claim to be a "Professor at Hillsdale College" in Moore. (Page 41 of the 2007 OPA Government Relations Guide)
However, the online Faculty/Staff Directory of the College, actually Hillsdale Free Will Baptist College, shows 41 members, not one named Randy Terrill.
Now granted, Terrill may truly be an adjunct instructor or guest lecturer along with being a business and legal consultant but he apparently does not merit the rank of "Professor".
Search this blog using keyword Randy Terrill for more fact or fiction stories.
And now ladies and gentlemen, it's time for the latest episode of "Randy Terrill: Fact or Fiction?"
State Rep. Randy Terrill, R-Moore, has done it again; making claims that just aren't true. The most recent is his claim to be a "Professor at Hillsdale College" in Moore. (Page 41 of the 2007 OPA Government Relations Guide)
However, the online Faculty/Staff Directory of the College, actually Hillsdale Free Will Baptist College, shows 41 members, not one named Randy Terrill.
Now granted, Terrill may truly be an adjunct instructor or guest lecturer along with being a business and legal consultant but he apparently does not merit the rank of "Professor".
Search this blog using keyword Randy Terrill for more fact or fiction stories.
Friday, February 16, 2007
Richardson to Campaign in OklahomaPresidential candidate Governor Bill Richardson, New Mexico, is reportedly making a campaign stop in Oklahoma March 18th. Details to follow.
Richardson made a dramatic speech at the DNC Winter Meeting last month. His speech was, according to some, the "break away" speech of the weekend. See it for yourself on the DNC website.
Dan Boren Comments on Iraq Resolution from the House Floor
I rise today in support of our men and women in uniform and in support of this resolution. Nearly 230,000 Americans are currently deployed to the Middle East, fighting the war on terrorism - 3,000 from my home state of Oklahoma. These men and women are fighting for their country not as Democrats or Republicans, but as Americans.
I was not in Congress nearly four years ago when the war in Iraq began. But in the two years I have served here, I have not once encountered a colleague who does not support our troops. We have our disagreements over strategy, spending and even the war itself, but when it comes to support for the selfless Americans serving in uniform we are unanimous. For anyone to suggest anything to the contrary just distracts from this serious debate.
As many of my colleagues have already noted, our troops are not the problem. They have done an outstanding job executing the mission they have been given. The problem is with the administration's strategy. We owe it to the men and women of our Armed Forces to pursue a policy that offers them the best possible chance of success - not a plan that repeats past mistakes.
The president's decision to deploy an additional 21,500 American combat troops to Iraq is not the first time we have sent a "surge" of troops into the conflict. In April of 2004, January and October of 2005, and again in October of last year, we saw temporary escalations that provided no long-term reductions in violence.
I am concerned that this latest plan is a renewed effort for more of the same; that does little to encourage the Iraqis to take responsibility for their own future. As one general told the Iraq Study Group, "all the troops in the world will not provide security if the Iraqi government does not make political progress." Rather than laying out a plan that establishes solid benchmarks for Iraqi security and the corresponding redeployment of U.S. troops, the president is pursuing a strategy that history shows does not work.
Former Secretary of State and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Colin Powell, Commander of U.S. Central Command General John Abizaid, Marine Corps Commandant General James Conway and many other current and former military leaders have said more troops is not the answer.
Our nation's military is already stretched thin. This open-ended plan to increase American troop levels in Iraq would exacerbate the overextension of our armed forces and cripple our ability to respond to other crises around the world. Because we don't know what the future holds, we have to be ready for anything.
U.S. and coalition forces successfully removed Saddam Hussein from power, and the world is a better place for it. But we now find ourselves locked in the middle of an Iraqi civil war. The Iraq of today is vastly different from the Iraq we entered nearly four years ago, yet our strategy remains the same. We need to succeed in Iraq, but we need to redefine what success is.
For over a year now, I have joined Chairman Skelton in his call for solid benchmarks in Iraq. We need a mechanism to measure our progress toward an Iraq that is responsible for its own security. It is in our interest, in Iraq's interest and in the interest of the region to ensure Iraqi personnel are trained and ready to take control sooner rather than later.
Reallocating some of the more than 140,000 troops we already have in Iraq to securing the Iranian border would do more to further our goals in Iraq than sending more Americans into Baghdad.
At the end of the day, military command decisions rest with the commander in chief. This resolution and this debate are not about micromanaging the war, or forcing a withdrawal of troops. Public opinion polls should not dictate war strategy; the facts should. And the facts are that surges haven't worked in the past and experts agree it won't work this time.
The president knows we are all in this together. That's why I was disappointed to see the administration move forward with such a dramatic escalation despite strong, bipartisan opposition in Congress. Without a clear mission or effective benchmarks, it is too big of a gamble to take with so many American lives.
I rise today in support of our men and women in uniform and in support of this resolution. Nearly 230,000 Americans are currently deployed to the Middle East, fighting the war on terrorism - 3,000 from my home state of Oklahoma. These men and women are fighting for their country not as Democrats or Republicans, but as Americans.
I was not in Congress nearly four years ago when the war in Iraq began. But in the two years I have served here, I have not once encountered a colleague who does not support our troops. We have our disagreements over strategy, spending and even the war itself, but when it comes to support for the selfless Americans serving in uniform we are unanimous. For anyone to suggest anything to the contrary just distracts from this serious debate.
As many of my colleagues have already noted, our troops are not the problem. They have done an outstanding job executing the mission they have been given. The problem is with the administration's strategy. We owe it to the men and women of our Armed Forces to pursue a policy that offers them the best possible chance of success - not a plan that repeats past mistakes.
The president's decision to deploy an additional 21,500 American combat troops to Iraq is not the first time we have sent a "surge" of troops into the conflict. In April of 2004, January and October of 2005, and again in October of last year, we saw temporary escalations that provided no long-term reductions in violence.
I am concerned that this latest plan is a renewed effort for more of the same; that does little to encourage the Iraqis to take responsibility for their own future. As one general told the Iraq Study Group, "all the troops in the world will not provide security if the Iraqi government does not make political progress." Rather than laying out a plan that establishes solid benchmarks for Iraqi security and the corresponding redeployment of U.S. troops, the president is pursuing a strategy that history shows does not work.
Former Secretary of State and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Colin Powell, Commander of U.S. Central Command General John Abizaid, Marine Corps Commandant General James Conway and many other current and former military leaders have said more troops is not the answer.
Our nation's military is already stretched thin. This open-ended plan to increase American troop levels in Iraq would exacerbate the overextension of our armed forces and cripple our ability to respond to other crises around the world. Because we don't know what the future holds, we have to be ready for anything.
U.S. and coalition forces successfully removed Saddam Hussein from power, and the world is a better place for it. But we now find ourselves locked in the middle of an Iraqi civil war. The Iraq of today is vastly different from the Iraq we entered nearly four years ago, yet our strategy remains the same. We need to succeed in Iraq, but we need to redefine what success is.
For over a year now, I have joined Chairman Skelton in his call for solid benchmarks in Iraq. We need a mechanism to measure our progress toward an Iraq that is responsible for its own security. It is in our interest, in Iraq's interest and in the interest of the region to ensure Iraqi personnel are trained and ready to take control sooner rather than later.
Reallocating some of the more than 140,000 troops we already have in Iraq to securing the Iranian border would do more to further our goals in Iraq than sending more Americans into Baghdad.
At the end of the day, military command decisions rest with the commander in chief. This resolution and this debate are not about micromanaging the war, or forcing a withdrawal of troops. Public opinion polls should not dictate war strategy; the facts should. And the facts are that surges haven't worked in the past and experts agree it won't work this time.
The president knows we are all in this together. That's why I was disappointed to see the administration move forward with such a dramatic escalation despite strong, bipartisan opposition in Congress. Without a clear mission or effective benchmarks, it is too big of a gamble to take with so many American lives.
Commentary: Obama Fuss Proves America’s More Ready for a Black President Than it Is for Black People
By: Tonyaa Weathersbee, BlackAmericaWeb.com
So, Barack Obama is officially in. And not unexpectedly, the disparagers have started in on him.
He's not experienced enough, say the ones who either are ignorant of, or don't want to give him credit for his several years in the Illinois Senate before being elected to the U.S. one.
He's not American enough, say the Sept. 11 opportunists who worry that the popularity of Obama, who attended a Muslim school as a child, might render their fear card useless. He's not black enough, say some black people who, after hearing endless punditry about being the black person that white people are most likely to love, see themselves as less lovable next to his kind of blackness.
But I'm glad that Obama is running. I'm glad because if nothing else, his candidacy will provide an update on the black condition in America. In the end, we'll learn whether this country is weary enough of the provincialism and narrowness that guided George W. Bush's presidency and got us stuck in a quagmire in Iraq to turn the country over to the intellectually superior and well-traveled Obama. We'll learn whether white people are capable of voting the way they say they will when they are polled regarding black candidates.
But most of all, we'll learn what it really takes for a black candidate to be elected to the nation's highest office. We'll learn whether it's really about experience, knowledge and charisma -- or whether it's about not being "too black."
The not-being-too-black thing bothers me.
Not because I believe Obama will feverishly avoid photo-ops with Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson to avoid being labeled as such. Not because I believe his Harvard pedigree and his mixed-race background somehow makes him not one of us. If anything, that brother's accomplishments make me extremely proud that he is one of us.
What bothers me is that being "too black" often boils down to the subjectivity of white people -- many of whom now believe that things such as civil rights issues are no longer real, but exaggerations of angry blacks stuck in the past. Too many times, it boils down to the "good" black versus the "bad" black -- the good black, of course, being the black who deals with black problems if asked, and the bad black being the one who doesn't wait to be asked.
What that means is that to get white votes, black candidates like Obama might be faced with having to make them comfortable at the expense of making black people invisible. And while I'm not saying that Obama will do this -- or is doing this -- many times the expectations tend to come down to this.
Managing such expectations can be tricky. Just ask Colin Powell.
Throughout the 1990s the former Secretary of State, who was riding a wave of success after the first Gulf War, was being widely touted as presidential timber. As with Obama, the not-too-black thing -- as well as his military pedigree -- was seen as being a major trait that would work in his favor.
But even though Powell never ran for president, I often wonder what would have happened if Powell had dared to be a "bad" black person when he was Secretary of State. I wonder if, instead of going along with George W. Bush's rush to war in Iraq when he knew it wasn't the right thing to do, as Washington Post journalist Bob Woodward wrote in his book about the war, he had gone public in his push to see where the sanctions led.
I wonder how many lives, black lives included, would have been saved if Powell had just quit being a soldier and started being a warrior.
Of course, Obama is no Powell. The fact that he is daring to run for president in the first place says that. And the only way to find out if America is ready for a black president is for a black person to run.
Yet, while I can't help but worry that the "not-too-black" stuff that speaks to Obama's appeal among white voters underscores the struggle that blacks still face in America; that black people have to constantly cover for being black in order to be accepted. What that means, in many instances, is that you cover your pain so as not to offend those who may be responsible for causing the conditions that led to that pain.
If Obama is elected, that pain will still be there. And while his victory would say that America is ready for a black president, it won't necessarily mean that it is ready for black people.
And that's what's sad.
Black History Month
This month is Black History Month, and I'm celebrating our Black History. My name is Teresa Hill. I am a very proud African America Woman, and I plan to share my heritage with the readers on OK Blue Notes.
FACT
Carter Godwin Woodson
Black History Month originated in 1926 by Carter Godwin Woodson as Negro History Week. The month of February was chosen in honor of Frederick Douglass and Abaham Lincoln, who were both born in that month.
FACT
Elijah McCoy (1843- 1929)
Elijah McCoy invented an automatic lubricator for oiling steam edngines in 1872. The term " the real Mc Coy" is believed to be a reference about the reliability of Elijah McCoy's invention.
FACT
Thomas L. Jennings (1791 - 1859)
Thomas L. Jennings was the first African-American to receive a patent in 1821. He used the money earned from the patent to purshase relatives out of slavery and support abolitionist causes.
FACT
Track and Field star, Jesse Owens broke many records at the 1946 Olympic games in Berlin, including becoming the first athlete to win four gld medals in one Olympiad.
FACT
Teresa Hill (Living)
Teresa Hill received the A.C. Hamlin Award from the Oklahoma Legislative Black Caucus for community service and committment to the Civil Rights, Organized Labor and Political Agenda of African-American and other minorities in April 2001.
Do the Math
GOP Rep. Randy Terrill, HD 53, who lays a false claim to establishing the state's premier college tuition assistance program OHLAP, has some explaining to do.
Terrill has positioned himself as an "OHLAP supporter" yet has not provided any suggestions for permanent funding.
Governor Brad Henry has proposed using 1.25% of the state income tax as a permanent funding source for OHLAP, also called Oklahoma's Promise. Henry's proposal would fully fund the program as it now exists.
Terrill wants to further reduce the state income tax which would result in a loss of about $400 million in state revenue.
Rep. Terrill, how many students could attend college under OHLAP if the state provided $400 million in funding every year? Do the math.
GOP Rep. Randy Terrill, HD 53, who lays a false claim to establishing the state's premier college tuition assistance program OHLAP, has some explaining to do.
Terrill has positioned himself as an "OHLAP supporter" yet has not provided any suggestions for permanent funding.
Governor Brad Henry has proposed using 1.25% of the state income tax as a permanent funding source for OHLAP, also called Oklahoma's Promise. Henry's proposal would fully fund the program as it now exists.
Terrill wants to further reduce the state income tax which would result in a loss of about $400 million in state revenue.
Rep. Terrill, how many students could attend college under OHLAP if the state provided $400 million in funding every year? Do the math.
Cal Hobson to Continue Career of Public Service --- at OU
(Hobson is no stranger to OU or Norman, having served as State Representative and more recently as State Senator for districts that include OU. I visited with Hobson and his wife Elaine last night in Norman about his new adventure. The OU family will be well served by Cal Hobson.)
Former senator takes a new career path
By Althea Peterson
The Norman Transcript
— After a lifetime of service in the state Legislature and the U.S. Air Force, one of the area’s native sons will join the state’s “flagship university.”
Former state Senate President Pro Tempore Cal Hobson, 61, will join the staff of the OU College of Continuing Education as director of Adult Executive Training Programs, the university announced Thursday.
Hobson, who will be paid $65,000 annually, said he looked forward to the opportunity.
“The opportunity to work at Oklahoma’s flagship university is a dream I’ve had since I was a child,” Hobson said in an interview with The Transcript. “My grandma was the first OU graduate in the family, and both sides of our family haven’t gone anywhere else since.”
According to a university release, Hobson’s role will be to work with corporate, military, governmental and Native American tribal leadership training programs operated through the center for continuing education. He will provide direction for the training programs and also work to prepare grant applications to bring additional training programs to the center.
“I’ve worked in all of these area extensively, so I am looking forward to it,” said Hobson, a veteran of the Air Force for more than 30 years and member of the state House and Senate for nearly 30 years. “The opportunity to work with Dr. (James) Pappas (OU vice president for outreach and dean of the College of Liberal Studies) was the deciding factor.”
Pappas shared the excitement of bringing Hobson to OU.
“Cal Hobson brings valuable experience in leadership roles across a broad range of sectors,” Pappas said. “I am delighted that he will be joining us.”
Hobson earned his bachelor’s degree from OU and has completed all course work for a master’s degree. OU also honored his involvement in bringing the National Weather Center to Norman last fall by naming a room after him — although he admits that because of his busy schedule, he has not yet been able to see it. He said he hopes to give back to the university and the Norman community after all both have given him.
“I’m anxious to see Norman,” said Hobson, who lives in Lexington with his wife, Elaine. “Norman is Oklahoma’s greatest city in many ways. I want to pay back all the things (the university’s) done for me… I’ve received my degree there, I received my commission to the Air Force there… I want to give back to what has given me my opportunities in life.”
“Cal Hobson is a person with great ability who will work to expand the number of our adult leadership training programs and to improve their quality,” OU President David Boren said.
As Hobson’s final year in the state Senate because of term limits ended, he ran an unsuccessful bid for lieutenant governor in 2006. He said after leaving office, he received opportunities to lobby at the Capitol— but none that compared to the opportunity to work at OU.
“Public policy is what I wanted to work on,” Hobson said. “I will miss (working at the Capitol), but I know my role at the university now, and I’m very excited at the chance.”
Althea Peterson
366-3539
apeterson@normantranscript.com
Copyright © 1999-2006 cnhi, inc.
Thursday, February 15, 2007
Black History Month
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
The Text of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.'s
"I Have a Dream" Speech
Aug. 28, 1963
I am happy to join with you today in what will go down in history as the greatest demonstration for freedom in the history of our nation.Five score years ago, a great American, in whose symbolic shadow we stand today, signed the Emancipation Proclamation. This momentous decree came as a great beacon of hope to millions of Negro slaves, who had been seared in the flames of withering injustice. It came as a joyous daybreak to end the long night of their captivity. But one hundred years later, the Negro is still not free. One hundred years later, the life of the Negro is still sadly crippled by the manacle of segregation and the chains of discrimination.
One hundred years later, the Negro lives on a lonely island of poverty in the midst of a vast ocean of material prosperity. One hundred years later, the Negro is still languishing in the corners of American society and finds himself an exile in his own land So we have come here today to dramatize a shameful condition.
In a sense we have come to our Nation's Capital to cash a check. When the architects of our great republic wrote the magnificent words of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, they were signing a promissory note to which every American was to fall heir.
This note was a promise that all men, yes, black men as well as white men, would be guaranteed to the inalienable rights of life liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
It is obvious today that America has defaulted on this promissory note insofar as her citizens of color are concerned. Instead of honoring this sacred obligation, America has given the Negro people a bad check, a check that has come back marked "insufficient funds."
But we refuse to believe that the bank of justice is bankrupt. We refuse to believe that there are insufficient funds in the great vaults of opportunity of this nation. So we have come to cash this check, a check that will give us upon demand the riches of freedom and security of justice.
We have also come to this hallowed spot to remind America of the fierce urgency of Now. This is not time to engage in the luxury of cooling off or to take the tranquilizing drug of gradualism.
Now is the time to make real the promise of democracy.
Now is the time to rise from the dark and desolate valley of segregation to the sunlit path of racial justice.
Now is the time to lift our nation from the quicksands of racial injustice to the solid rock of brotherhood.
Now is the time to make justice a reality to all of God's children.
It would be fatal for the nation to overlook the urgency of the moment and to underestimate the determination of it's colored citizens. This sweltering summer of the Negro's legitimate discontent will not pass until there is an invigorating autumn of freedom and equality. Nineteen sixty-three is not an end but a beginning. Those who hope that the Negro needed to blow off steam and will now be content will have a rude awakening if the nation returns to business as usual.
There will be neither rest nor tranquility in America until the Negro is granted his citizenship rights. The whirlwinds of revolt will continue to shake the foundations of our nation until the bright day of justice emerges.
But there is something that I must say to my people who stand on the warm threshold which leads into the palace of justice. In the process of gaining our rightful place we must not be guilty of wrongful deeds.
Let us not seek to satisfy our thirst for freedom by drinking from the cup of bitterness and hatred. We must ever conduct our struggle on the high plane of dignity and discipline. We must not allow our creative protest to degenerate into physical violence. Again and again we must rise to the majestic heights of meeting physical force with soul force.
The marvelous new militancy which has engulfed the Negro community must not lead us to a distrust of all white people, for many of our white brothers, as evidenced by their presence here today, have come to realize that their destiny is tied up with our destiny. They have come to realize that their freedom is inextricably bound to our freedom. We cannot walk alone.
And as we walk, we must make the pledge that we shall always march ahead. We cannot turn back. There are those who are asking the devotees of civil rights, "When will you be satisfied?" We can never be satisfied as long as the Negro is the victim of the unspeakable horrors of police brutality.
We can never be satisfied as long as our bodies, heavy with the fatigue of travel, cannot gain lodging in the motels of the highways and the hotels of the cities.
We cannot be satisfied as long as the Negro's basic mobility is from a smaller ghetto to a larger one.
We can never be satisfied as long as our children are stripped of their selfhood and robbed of their dignity by signs stating "for white only."
We cannot be satisfied as long as a Negro in Mississippi cannot vote and a Negro in New York believes he has nothing for which to vote.
No, no we are not satisfied and we will not be satisfied until justice rolls down like waters and righteousness like a mighty stream.
I am not unmindful that some of you have come here out of your trials and tribulations. Some of you have come fresh from narrow jail cells. Some of you have come from areas where your quest for freedom left you battered by storms of persecutions and staggered by the winds of police brutality.
You have been the veterans of creative suffering. Continue to work with the faith that unearned suffering is redemptive.
Go back to Mississippi, go back to Alabama, go back to South Carolina go back to Georgia, go back to Louisiana, go back to the slums and ghettos of our modern cities, knowing that somehow this situation can and will be changed.
Let us not wallow in the valley of despair. I say to you today, my friends, that even though we face the difficulties of today and tomorrow. I still have a dream. It is a dream deeply rooted in the American dream.
I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed. We hold these truths to be self-evident that all men are created equal.
I have a dream that one day on the red hills of Georgia the sons of former slaves and the sons of former slave owners will be able to sit down together at the table of brotherhood.
I have a dream that one day even the state of Mississippi, a state sweltering with the heat of oppression, will be transformed into an oasis of freedom and justice.
I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.
I have a dream today.
I have a dream that one day down in Alabama, with its vicious racists, with its governor having his lips dripping with the words of interposition and nullification; that one day right down in Alabama little black boys and black girls will be able to join hands with little white boys and white girls as sisters and brothers.
I have a dream today.
I have a dream that one day every valley shall be exalted, and every hill and every mountain shall be made low, the rough places will be made plains and the crooked places will be made straight and the glory of the Lord shall be revealed and all flesh shall see it together.
This is our hope. This is the faith that I will go back to the South with. With this faith we will be able to hew out of the mountain of despair a stone of hope.
With this faith we will be able to transform the jangling discords of our nation into a beautiful symphony of brotherhood.
With this faith we will be able to work together, to pray together, to struggle together, to go to jail together, to climb up for freedom together, knowing that we will be free one day.
This will be the day when all of God's children will be able to sing with new meaning "My country 'tis of thee, sweet land of liberty, of thee I sing. Land where my father's died, land of the Pilgrim's pride, from every mountainside, let freedom ring!"
And if America is to be a great nation, this must become true. So let freedom ring from the hilltops of New Hampshire. Let freedom ring from the mighty mountains of New York.
Let freedom ring from the heightening Alleghenies of Pennsylvania.
Let freedom ring from the snow-capped Rockies of Colorado.
Let freedom ring from the curvaceous slopes of California.
But not only that, let freedom, ring from Stone Mountain of Georgia.
Let freedom ring from every hill and molehill of Mississippi and every mountainside.
And when this happens, when we let freedom ring, when we let it ring from every tenement and every hamlet, from every state and every city, we will be able to speed up that day when all of God's children, black men and white men, Jews and Gentiles, Protestants and Catholics, will be able to join hands and sing in the words of the old spiritual, "Free at last, free at last. Thank God Almighty, we are free at last."
I am happy to join with you today in what will go down in history as the greatest demonstration for freedom in the history of our nation.Five score years ago, a great American, in whose symbolic shadow we stand today, signed the Emancipation Proclamation. This momentous decree came as a great beacon of hope to millions of Negro slaves, who had been seared in the flames of withering injustice. It came as a joyous daybreak to end the long night of their captivity. But one hundred years later, the Negro is still not free. One hundred years later, the life of the Negro is still sadly crippled by the manacle of segregation and the chains of discrimination.
One hundred years later, the Negro lives on a lonely island of poverty in the midst of a vast ocean of material prosperity. One hundred years later, the Negro is still languishing in the corners of American society and finds himself an exile in his own land So we have come here today to dramatize a shameful condition.
In a sense we have come to our Nation's Capital to cash a check. When the architects of our great republic wrote the magnificent words of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, they were signing a promissory note to which every American was to fall heir.
This note was a promise that all men, yes, black men as well as white men, would be guaranteed to the inalienable rights of life liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
It is obvious today that America has defaulted on this promissory note insofar as her citizens of color are concerned. Instead of honoring this sacred obligation, America has given the Negro people a bad check, a check that has come back marked "insufficient funds."
But we refuse to believe that the bank of justice is bankrupt. We refuse to believe that there are insufficient funds in the great vaults of opportunity of this nation. So we have come to cash this check, a check that will give us upon demand the riches of freedom and security of justice.
We have also come to this hallowed spot to remind America of the fierce urgency of Now. This is not time to engage in the luxury of cooling off or to take the tranquilizing drug of gradualism.
Now is the time to make real the promise of democracy.
Now is the time to rise from the dark and desolate valley of segregation to the sunlit path of racial justice.
Now is the time to lift our nation from the quicksands of racial injustice to the solid rock of brotherhood.
Now is the time to make justice a reality to all of God's children.
It would be fatal for the nation to overlook the urgency of the moment and to underestimate the determination of it's colored citizens. This sweltering summer of the Negro's legitimate discontent will not pass until there is an invigorating autumn of freedom and equality. Nineteen sixty-three is not an end but a beginning. Those who hope that the Negro needed to blow off steam and will now be content will have a rude awakening if the nation returns to business as usual.
There will be neither rest nor tranquility in America until the Negro is granted his citizenship rights. The whirlwinds of revolt will continue to shake the foundations of our nation until the bright day of justice emerges.
But there is something that I must say to my people who stand on the warm threshold which leads into the palace of justice. In the process of gaining our rightful place we must not be guilty of wrongful deeds.
Let us not seek to satisfy our thirst for freedom by drinking from the cup of bitterness and hatred. We must ever conduct our struggle on the high plane of dignity and discipline. We must not allow our creative protest to degenerate into physical violence. Again and again we must rise to the majestic heights of meeting physical force with soul force.
The marvelous new militancy which has engulfed the Negro community must not lead us to a distrust of all white people, for many of our white brothers, as evidenced by their presence here today, have come to realize that their destiny is tied up with our destiny. They have come to realize that their freedom is inextricably bound to our freedom. We cannot walk alone.
And as we walk, we must make the pledge that we shall always march ahead. We cannot turn back. There are those who are asking the devotees of civil rights, "When will you be satisfied?" We can never be satisfied as long as the Negro is the victim of the unspeakable horrors of police brutality.
We can never be satisfied as long as our bodies, heavy with the fatigue of travel, cannot gain lodging in the motels of the highways and the hotels of the cities.
We cannot be satisfied as long as the Negro's basic mobility is from a smaller ghetto to a larger one.
We can never be satisfied as long as our children are stripped of their selfhood and robbed of their dignity by signs stating "for white only."
We cannot be satisfied as long as a Negro in Mississippi cannot vote and a Negro in New York believes he has nothing for which to vote.
No, no we are not satisfied and we will not be satisfied until justice rolls down like waters and righteousness like a mighty stream.
I am not unmindful that some of you have come here out of your trials and tribulations. Some of you have come fresh from narrow jail cells. Some of you have come from areas where your quest for freedom left you battered by storms of persecutions and staggered by the winds of police brutality.
You have been the veterans of creative suffering. Continue to work with the faith that unearned suffering is redemptive.
Go back to Mississippi, go back to Alabama, go back to South Carolina go back to Georgia, go back to Louisiana, go back to the slums and ghettos of our modern cities, knowing that somehow this situation can and will be changed.
Let us not wallow in the valley of despair. I say to you today, my friends, that even though we face the difficulties of today and tomorrow. I still have a dream. It is a dream deeply rooted in the American dream.
I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed. We hold these truths to be self-evident that all men are created equal.
I have a dream that one day on the red hills of Georgia the sons of former slaves and the sons of former slave owners will be able to sit down together at the table of brotherhood.
I have a dream that one day even the state of Mississippi, a state sweltering with the heat of oppression, will be transformed into an oasis of freedom and justice.
I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.
I have a dream today.
I have a dream that one day down in Alabama, with its vicious racists, with its governor having his lips dripping with the words of interposition and nullification; that one day right down in Alabama little black boys and black girls will be able to join hands with little white boys and white girls as sisters and brothers.
I have a dream today.
I have a dream that one day every valley shall be exalted, and every hill and every mountain shall be made low, the rough places will be made plains and the crooked places will be made straight and the glory of the Lord shall be revealed and all flesh shall see it together.
This is our hope. This is the faith that I will go back to the South with. With this faith we will be able to hew out of the mountain of despair a stone of hope.
With this faith we will be able to transform the jangling discords of our nation into a beautiful symphony of brotherhood.
With this faith we will be able to work together, to pray together, to struggle together, to go to jail together, to climb up for freedom together, knowing that we will be free one day.
This will be the day when all of God's children will be able to sing with new meaning "My country 'tis of thee, sweet land of liberty, of thee I sing. Land where my father's died, land of the Pilgrim's pride, from every mountainside, let freedom ring!"
And if America is to be a great nation, this must become true. So let freedom ring from the hilltops of New Hampshire. Let freedom ring from the mighty mountains of New York.
Let freedom ring from the heightening Alleghenies of Pennsylvania.
Let freedom ring from the snow-capped Rockies of Colorado.
Let freedom ring from the curvaceous slopes of California.
But not only that, let freedom, ring from Stone Mountain of Georgia.
Let freedom ring from every hill and molehill of Mississippi and every mountainside.
And when this happens, when we let freedom ring, when we let it ring from every tenement and every hamlet, from every state and every city, we will be able to speed up that day when all of God's children, black men and white men, Jews and Gentiles, Protestants and Catholics, will be able to join hands and sing in the words of the old spiritual, "Free at last, free at last. Thank God Almighty, we are free at last."
Gary Allison from Tulsa's Just Progress group asked me to pass along this invitation to attend the 2007 Progressive Revival Retreat featuring Tulsa Senator Tom Adelson, Frosty Troy, and Bishop Carlton Pearson.
For more information about Just Progress and the retreat contact Gary at nestapup@cox.net or check out the Just Progress website at http://www.justprogress.org/
Stamp the Rooster, Maybe Not
The admonition to "Stamp the Rooster" meaning "vote straight Democrat" is one step closer to the history books after Senate Bill 16 authored by Democratic Sen. Debbe Leftwich (OKC) received a "do pass" in the Senate Rules Committee yesterday.
The measure removes language that allows for straight party voting, something that Leftwich believes is resulting in confusion and undervoting. That is to say the way our ballots are configured it's not enought to "stamp the rooster" once but in some cases a voter must mark it three times to vote for all of the Democrats on the ballot. Leftwich figures that every vote should count and is concerned that some votes are not being counted simply because they are not marked correctly through the straight party option.
While I like the idea of encouraging a straight party vote, and like the saying "Stamp the Rooster 'til the feathers fly" even better, I always vote for every individual Democrat on the ballot. It gives me satisfaction to vote for so many Democrats rather than a barnyard animal.
Thanks Sen. Leftwich!
Gov. Henry's Cabinet
Congratulations to Natalie Shirley and Michael Crutcher on their recent appointments to Gov. Brad Henry's Cabinet.
Shirley was named Secretary of Commerce and Tourism, replacing Kathy Taylor, now Mayor of Tulsa.
Crutcher is the new Health Secretary replacing Terry Cline.
The 14 members of Gov. Henry's Cabinet are:
Secretary of Agriculture Terry Peach
Secretary of Commerce and Tourism Natalie Shirley
Secretary of Energy David Fleischaker
Secretary of the Environment Miles Tolbert
Secretary of Finance and Revenue Scott Meacham
Secretary of Health Dr. Mike Crutcher
Secretary of Human Resources and Administration Oscar B. Jackson Jr.
Secretary of Human Services Howard Hendrick
Secretary of the Military Gen. Harry "Bud" Wyatt III
Secretary of Safety and Security Kevin Ward
Secretary of Science and Technology Dr. Joe Alexander
Secretary of State Susan Savage
Secretary of Transportation Phil Tomlinson
Secretary of Veterans Affairs Norman Lamb
Congratulations to Natalie Shirley and Michael Crutcher on their recent appointments to Gov. Brad Henry's Cabinet.
Shirley was named Secretary of Commerce and Tourism, replacing Kathy Taylor, now Mayor of Tulsa.
Crutcher is the new Health Secretary replacing Terry Cline.
The 14 members of Gov. Henry's Cabinet are:
Secretary of Agriculture Terry Peach
Secretary of Commerce and Tourism Natalie Shirley
Secretary of Energy David Fleischaker
Secretary of the Environment Miles Tolbert
Secretary of Finance and Revenue Scott Meacham
Secretary of Health Dr. Mike Crutcher
Secretary of Human Resources and Administration Oscar B. Jackson Jr.
Secretary of Human Services Howard Hendrick
Secretary of the Military Gen. Harry "Bud" Wyatt III
Secretary of Safety and Security Kevin Ward
Secretary of Science and Technology Dr. Joe Alexander
Secretary of State Susan Savage
Secretary of Transportation Phil Tomlinson
Secretary of Veterans Affairs Norman Lamb
Fit to Lead
Check out the story in today's Tulsa World about state legislators' work outs at the OKC YMCA. Leading the pack in the effort to set the pace for fit lifestyles are two Tulsa Democrats Rep. Jabar Shumate and Rep. Lucky Lamons. Rush Springs native Democrat Rep. Joe Dorman is also featured in the story. Read it below.
'Fit to Lead': Legislators trim the fat
By ANGEL RIGGS World Capitol Bureau
2/15/2007
Goal: Encourage others to shape up
OKLAHOMA CITY -- Hours before they're due at the state Capitol, about two dozen Oklahoma lawmakers spend their early mornings at the gym in an effort, they say, to lead by example.
The lawmakers' workout program officially began last year but was whipped into shape this session by Becky Switzer, the former University of Oklahoma women's gymnastics coach and the wife of football coaching legend Barry Switzer.
Oklahomans need to hear more about fit and active lifestyles, Becky Switzer said, "and we need to start at the very top."
The idea of the program, called "Fit to Lead," is to get the lawmakers moving, she said.
Between 20 and 25 lawmakers in the program meet each morning at a downtown Oklahoma City YMCA, where they work out for at least 45 minutes, five days a week. The YMCA offers the program at no cost to legislators during the session, Switzer said, but many lawmakers already have their own YMCA memberships.
The bipartisan program includes weekly meetings, where the lawmakers receive fitness tips and hear from speakers, said Rep. Joe Dorman, D-Rush Springs, who helped organize the effort.
In addition to better health, he said, the time at the gym helps with camaraderie among lawmakers.
Rep. Jabar Shumate, D-Tulsa, lost 67 pounds in the last year and has seen better blood pressure numbers, he said.
"After 67 pounds, I feel like I've just added 10 years to my life," said the 31-year-old lawmaker, who combines 40 minutes of cardio workouts and 20 minutes of weightlifting every day.
He said he is motivated, in part, by the alarming health statistics for African Americans.
"We live shorter lives and we live that shorter life more uncomfortably," he said, referring to increased rates of hypertension, diabetes and cancer among blacks.
"It's important for me to set an example."
Shumate said that roughly 70 percent of people have no health insurance in his district, which includes portions of Tulsa and Osage counties.
People need healthier options from childhood through their adult years, he said, adding that more nutritious food in schools and allowing workers time for exercise would help.
"If we don't turn that tide, if we don't correct this, companies won't come here because they can't afford to insure their workers."
The state of Oklahoma ranks 45th in the nation for its citizens' overall health, according to the Oklahoma Fit Kids Coalition.
In fact, in Oklahoma, 1.5 million adults are overweight, and of those, 500,000 are obese, according to the coalition.
The Oklahoma Health Department reported that the cost of obesity-attributable medical expenses for Medicaid and Medicare is about $854 million per year. That figure doesn't include costs for private insurance and businesses.
Nationwide, obesity-related medical expenses costs taxpayers between $69 billion and $117 billion each year, according to the Health Department.
Rep. Lucky Lamons, D-Tulsa, works out at least an hour and a half each day, and has long been an exercise enthusiast.
However, in the mid-1980s, he said, he weighed 245 pounds and smoked two packs of cigarettes per day.
But, Lamons said, he gave up sodas, began jogging twice around the block, and learned to eat healthier.
"I now weigh 176 and don't smoke," he said. In fact, Lamons has become a veteran marathon and triathlon athlete.
"Obesity costs billions of dollars a year to our medical systems," he said. "And it's preventable."
Wednesday, February 14, 2007
AP: Bill would eliminate straight party voting
A bill to end straight party voting is heading to the state Senate. The bill by Senator Debbe Leftwich would eliminate the option of marking a box to vote for all the candidates of a single political party. The bill was passed out of the Senate Rules Committee today and goes to the full Senate for consideration.
Leftwich says the problem is voters have to mark at least two or three boxes on the ballot and many voters don't realize that. She says a voter could mark the ballot as straight party for statewide races _ but if they don't mark it again for local races the person would not have voted in the local election. And she says many voters also don't realized judicial candidates don't run as Democrats or Republicans and fail to vote in those races.
A bill to end straight party voting is heading to the state Senate. The bill by Senator Debbe Leftwich would eliminate the option of marking a box to vote for all the candidates of a single political party. The bill was passed out of the Senate Rules Committee today and goes to the full Senate for consideration.
Leftwich says the problem is voters have to mark at least two or three boxes on the ballot and many voters don't realize that. She says a voter could mark the ballot as straight party for statewide races _ but if they don't mark it again for local races the person would not have voted in the local election. And she says many voters also don't realized judicial candidates don't run as Democrats or Republicans and fail to vote in those races.
Hillary's Visit to New Hampshire
Sen. Hillary Clinton began her tour of New Hampshire Sunday where she addressed her vote for the authorization of force in Iraq. She is one of very few Democrats who has not apologized for her vote, and this has been a source of animosity with anti-war groups.
"I have taken responsibility for that vote. It was based on the best assessment that I could make at the time, and it was clearly intended to demonstrate support for going to the United Nations to put inspectors into Iraq."
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0207/2701.html
This is in stark contrast to other candidates such as John Edwards, who has explicitly stated that he regards his vote as a mistake. Or Barak Obama, who was not yet in the Senate at the time the war was authorized- but did not support the war at it's outset.
If elected, her position on Iraq is clear
"If this president doesn't extricate us from Iraq, as president, I will."
http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070211/REPOSITORY/702110397
Sen. Hillary Clinton began her tour of New Hampshire Sunday where she addressed her vote for the authorization of force in Iraq. She is one of very few Democrats who has not apologized for her vote, and this has been a source of animosity with anti-war groups.
"I have taken responsibility for that vote. It was based on the best assessment that I could make at the time, and it was clearly intended to demonstrate support for going to the United Nations to put inspectors into Iraq."
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0207/2701.html
This is in stark contrast to other candidates such as John Edwards, who has explicitly stated that he regards his vote as a mistake. Or Barak Obama, who was not yet in the Senate at the time the war was authorized- but did not support the war at it's outset.
If elected, her position on Iraq is clear
"If this president doesn't extricate us from Iraq, as president, I will."
http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070211/REPOSITORY/702110397
100 Ideas: A Thinly Veiled GOP Agenda Tactic
In the world of good ideas the ones that include being straightforward to the voting public and providing full disclosure are the best. However, these ideas aren’t something you’ll see coming from Republican House Speaker Lance Cargill’s 100 Ideas Initiative. Oklahoma Democratic Party Chairman Lisa Pryor said the 100 ideas ploy, a cheap knock-off from the Florida GOP, is a thinly veiled preview of the Oklahoma Republican legislative agenda and the party’s campaign talking points for 2008.
She said the most disturbing and questionable thing about the alleged “bi-partisan” organization is that Thad Balkman, an ultra-conservative former Republican legislator, is heading the effort at an undisclosed salary. His new executive director salary is a mystery. He said only that it ranges from $38,400 (what he made as a State Representative) and not more than $100,000; in other words, he revealed nothing.
“Now, I’d like to give Lance Cargill and Thad Balkman the benefit of the doubt, that they truly want the best ideas for Oklahoma, but don’t kid yourself, this is really a first step in trying to reshape the Republican Party into something it can never be, the party of the people, progress, and ideas,” Pryor said.
In a recent Tulsa World interview, Balkman indicated that consideration is based on an idea’s agreement with Speaker Cargill’s political philosophy, one which has proved to be on the extreme right wing of his own party. His raw ambition and ideological driven antics were central to his removal as majority floor leader by former Speaker Todd Hiett during the 2006 legislative session.
Balkman also said that the initiative contributors will be identified quarterly, but that those who wish to remain anonymous would be allowed to do so.
“Where is the transparency in that? If great ideas lead to great projects then why all the cloak and dagger tactics?” Pryor said. “A look at the group’s board of advisors shows all registered Republicans, save two lonely spots for a Democrat and an Independent. If gathering this group of extremist ideologists under the guise of benefiting working Oklahoma families is such a great idea, then I ask the House Speaker, why not have your House leadership team openly working on this public project?”
Pryor said the 100 Ideas Initiative is a shadowy and secretive project to keep Republican values like protecting corporate bottom lines in the forefront of the legislative agenda.
In the world of good ideas the ones that include being straightforward to the voting public and providing full disclosure are the best. However, these ideas aren’t something you’ll see coming from Republican House Speaker Lance Cargill’s 100 Ideas Initiative. Oklahoma Democratic Party Chairman Lisa Pryor said the 100 ideas ploy, a cheap knock-off from the Florida GOP, is a thinly veiled preview of the Oklahoma Republican legislative agenda and the party’s campaign talking points for 2008.
She said the most disturbing and questionable thing about the alleged “bi-partisan” organization is that Thad Balkman, an ultra-conservative former Republican legislator, is heading the effort at an undisclosed salary. His new executive director salary is a mystery. He said only that it ranges from $38,400 (what he made as a State Representative) and not more than $100,000; in other words, he revealed nothing.
“Now, I’d like to give Lance Cargill and Thad Balkman the benefit of the doubt, that they truly want the best ideas for Oklahoma, but don’t kid yourself, this is really a first step in trying to reshape the Republican Party into something it can never be, the party of the people, progress, and ideas,” Pryor said.
In a recent Tulsa World interview, Balkman indicated that consideration is based on an idea’s agreement with Speaker Cargill’s political philosophy, one which has proved to be on the extreme right wing of his own party. His raw ambition and ideological driven antics were central to his removal as majority floor leader by former Speaker Todd Hiett during the 2006 legislative session.
Balkman also said that the initiative contributors will be identified quarterly, but that those who wish to remain anonymous would be allowed to do so.
“Where is the transparency in that? If great ideas lead to great projects then why all the cloak and dagger tactics?” Pryor said. “A look at the group’s board of advisors shows all registered Republicans, save two lonely spots for a Democrat and an Independent. If gathering this group of extremist ideologists under the guise of benefiting working Oklahoma families is such a great idea, then I ask the House Speaker, why not have your House leadership team openly working on this public project?”
Pryor said the 100 Ideas Initiative is a shadowy and secretive project to keep Republican values like protecting corporate bottom lines in the forefront of the legislative agenda.
Red Harlow
Who is Red Harlow and what does he have in common with Sen. Tom Adelson, Sen. Sean Burrage, Sen. Andrew Rice, Sen. John Sparks and the Honorable Brad Carson?
One clue is that three of the above are newly elected Democratic Senators who are strong advocates of accessible, affordable health care for Oklahomans. Burrage, Rice and Sparks are already making a name for themselves as "go to" senators for issues related to protecting Oklahoma families and citizens. We need more like them!
Who is Red Harlow and what does he have in common with Sen. Tom Adelson, Sen. Sean Burrage, Sen. Andrew Rice, Sen. John Sparks and the Honorable Brad Carson?
One clue is that three of the above are newly elected Democratic Senators who are strong advocates of accessible, affordable health care for Oklahomans. Burrage, Rice and Sparks are already making a name for themselves as "go to" senators for issues related to protecting Oklahoma families and citizens. We need more like them!
BLACK HISTORY MONTH
Picture: Slaves being transported.Least we forget....
'The absence of a permanent memorial to commemorate the lives of the millions of lives lost to the slave trade needs to be addressed'
–The Most Revd Dr John Sentamu, Archbishop of York.
2007 Bicentenary
It is 200 years since Parliament passed the Act to abolish the slave trade in the British Empire – the start of a long road to abolition. The slave trade was a profoundly inhuman enterprise and the bicentenary provides us with an opportunity to express our sorrow that it happened.
It also enables us to remember those who suffered and who campaigned for abolition, and to re-double our efforts to address the legacy of the slave trade and to tackle injustice in the world today.
2007 Bicentenary of the Abolition of the Slave Trade Act: Calendar of Events.
Biden Provides Plan for Iraq
All Democratic Presidential candidates for 2008 agree that a new strategy must be enforced in Iraq. Though candidates have voiced concern, many have not offered a true plan to call their own. Senator Joe Biden has not only agreed that strategy in Iraq must be altered he has provided a five point plan for success in the region. In this five point plan Biden offers a new idea for Iraq by allowing Shiites, Sunnis, and Kurds to have separate regions of the country assigned to them. In addition there would be a central government in charge of common interests that would include the sharing of oil revenues and security. To read more about Senator Biden’s plan visit PlanforIraq.com.
-Cole Hines
(The photo above is from the Tulsa World today featuring the seven Oklahoma governors at the Oklahoma History Center last night. From left to right are Gov. George Nigh, Gov. David Hall, Gov. David Walters, Gov. Brad Henry, Gov. Frank Keating, Gov. David Boren, and Gov. Henry Bellmon.)
Inspired to Lead
Last night's festivities at the Oklahoma History Center were truly remarkable! Literally history on display with all seven of Oklahoma's living governors present and most likely the next two or three governors in the room together. I took my camera in but after a few minutes decided I could enjoy the event or take pictures, and there were plenty of photo ops -- so I put away the camera and enjoyed history in the making.
Dick and I enjoyed visiting with many of our Democratic friends and vowed to return soon to actually study the exhibits that feature the governors and first ladies. I also want to check out the new items in the History Center's gift shop.
With more than 1,000 people there it would be impossible to name all of the good Democrats there but I could start by listing the five Democratic governors: Gov. Brad Henry, Gov. David Walters, Gov. George Nigh, Gov. David Boren, and Gov. David Hall. (The other two governors honored were Gov. Frank Keating and Gov. Henry Bellmon, both Republicans.)
I also saw Lt. Gov. Jari Askins, Attorney General Drew Edmondson, State Auditor Jeff McMahan, State Superintendent Sandy Garrett, and Chancellor Glenn Johnson.
Former Attorney General Mike Turpen and Carl Albert Award winner and former ODP Executive Director Pat Hall were there.
It was fun visiting with Rep. Al McAffrey, Rep. John Auffett, Rep. Terry Harrison, Rep. Mike Shelton, Rep. Anastasia Pittman, Rep. R.C. Pruett, and Rep. Mike Brown.
Great seeing so many young Democrats there including Pete Regan, a Nigh protege and former Chief of Staff for Congressman Dan Boren.
Nice to see Linda Gray Murphy there also. Murphy is one our strongest minimum wage advocates and lead the Raise Oklahoma campaign last spring.
If you were there and want to comment about the exhibits or the politicking going on you're invited to comment on this blog.
Army Strong
If you haven't seen it yet, the Army's new recruiting campaign is incredibly moving. Watch the video here. I saw it last fall in a presentation at Ft. Sill. It sent chills down my spine. Make no mistake, this military mom is proud of her Army son, and this military mom wants to be proud of our leaders too. Hooah!
Seriously, watch the video.
If you haven't seen it yet, the Army's new recruiting campaign is incredibly moving. Watch the video here. I saw it last fall in a presentation at Ft. Sill. It sent chills down my spine. Make no mistake, this military mom is proud of her Army son, and this military mom wants to be proud of our leaders too. Hooah!
Seriously, watch the video.
The House Debates, Bush Escalates, and the Army Lowers Standards
At the same time that Bush is calling for more troops to go referee a civil war in the Middle East the military is lowering its standards for recruiting just to fill the slots. Some say this further endangers our sons and daughters who are already on their second and third tours of combat duty. Others say it generally weakens the corps. While still others say give the young people a chance to serve, even if they have a criminal past. Whoever serves has my respect, unlike the politicians who put them in impossible situations.
Read this Associated Press story about the lowered standards.
Military Grants More Waivers to Recruits
Associated Press
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Army and Marine Corps are letting in more recruits with criminal records, including some with felony convictions, reflecting the increased pressure of five years of war and its mounting casualties.
According to data compiled by the Defense Department, the number of Army and Marine recruits needing waivers for felonies and serious misdemeanors, including minor drug offenses, has grown since 2003. The Army granted more than double the number of waivers for felonies and misdemeanors in 2006 than it did in 2003. Some recruits may get more than one waiver.
The military routinely grants waivers to admit recruits who have criminal records, medical problems or low aptitude scores that would otherwise disqualify them from service. Overall the majority are moral waivers, which include some felonies, misdemeanors, and traffic and drug offenses.
The number of felony waivers granted by the Army grew from 411 in 2003 to 901 in 2006, according to the Pentagon, or about one in 10 of the moral waivers approved that year. Other misdemeanors, which could be petty theft, writing a bad check or some assaults, jumped from about 2,700 to more than 6,000 in 2006. The minor crimes represented more than three-quarters of the moral waivers granted by the Army in 2006, up from more than half in 2003.
Army and Defense Department officials defended the waiver program as a way to admit young people who may have made a mistake early in life but have overcome past behavior. And they said about two-thirds of the waivers granted by the Marines are for drug use, because they - unlike the other services - require a waiver if someone has been convicted once for marijuana use.
Lawmakers and other observers say they are concerned that the struggle to fill the military ranks in this time of war has forced the services to lower their moral standards.
"The data is crystal clear. Our armed forces are under incredible strain and the only way that they can fill their recruiting quotas is by lowering their standards," said Rep. Marty Meehan, D-Mass., who has been working to get additional data from the Pentagon. "By lowering standards, we are endangering the rest of our armed forces and sending the wrong message to potential recruits across the country."
Army spokesman Paul Boyce said Tuesday he is concerned because the Pentagon data differs from Army numbers. But overall, he said, "anything that is considered a risk or a serious infraction of the law is given the highest level of review."
"Our goal is to make certain that we recruit quality young men and women who can keep America defended against its enemies," Boyce said.
The data was obtained through a federal information request and released by the California-based Michael D. Palm Center, a think tank that studies military issues.
"The fact that the military has allowed more than 100,000 people with such troubled pasts to join its ranks over the past three years illustrates the problem we're having meeting our military needs in this time of war," said Aaron Belkin, director of the center.
Belkin said a new study commissioned by the center also concludes that the military does not have any programs that help convicted felons adjust to military life.
In recent years, as the Iraq and Afghanistan wars have dragged on, the military has also relaxed some standards in order to meet recruitment demands. The Army, for example, increased its age limit for recruits from 35 to 42, and is accepting more people whose scores on a standardized aptitude test are at the lower end of the acceptable range.
In its report, the Pentagon said, "The waiver process recognizes that some young people have made mistakes, have overcome their past behavior, and have clearly demonstrated the potential for being productive, law-abiding citizens and members of the military."
According to the Pentagon, nearly a quarter of new military recruits needed some type of waiver in 2006, up from 20 percent in 2003. Roughly 30,000 moral waivers were approved each year between 2003 and 2006.
The military in its report divides moral waivers into six categories: felonies, serious and minor non-traffic offenses, serious and minor traffic offenses and drug offenses. Because many states have different crimes categorized as a felony or misdemeanor, the groupings are more general.
About one in five Army recruits needed a waiver to enlist in 2006, up from 12.7 percent in 2003. In addition, the report showed that the Army granted substantially fewer waivers for drug use and serious traffic violations last year than in 2003.
More than half of the Marine recruits needed a waiver in 2006, a bit higher than in 2003, and largely due to their more strict drug requirements. Felony waivers made up about 2 percent of the Marine waivers, while other lesser crimes made up about 25 percent, both up slightly from 2003.
About 18 percent of Navy recruits required a waiver, up only slightly from 2003. Two-thirds of the waivers granted by the Navy were for misdemeanor-type crimes and about 5 percent were for felonies.
Just 8 percent of Air Force recruits had waivers, down a bit from 2003. Nearly all of the waivers were for the misdemeanor-type crimes.
If you know an Oklahoma veteran or someone who is currently serving let us know their name so we can thank them personally for the sacrifices they've made and are making for us and invite them to join our ODP Veterans and Military Families Committee.
At the same time that Bush is calling for more troops to go referee a civil war in the Middle East the military is lowering its standards for recruiting just to fill the slots. Some say this further endangers our sons and daughters who are already on their second and third tours of combat duty. Others say it generally weakens the corps. While still others say give the young people a chance to serve, even if they have a criminal past. Whoever serves has my respect, unlike the politicians who put them in impossible situations.
Read this Associated Press story about the lowered standards.
Military Grants More Waivers to Recruits
Associated Press
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Army and Marine Corps are letting in more recruits with criminal records, including some with felony convictions, reflecting the increased pressure of five years of war and its mounting casualties.
According to data compiled by the Defense Department, the number of Army and Marine recruits needing waivers for felonies and serious misdemeanors, including minor drug offenses, has grown since 2003. The Army granted more than double the number of waivers for felonies and misdemeanors in 2006 than it did in 2003. Some recruits may get more than one waiver.
The military routinely grants waivers to admit recruits who have criminal records, medical problems or low aptitude scores that would otherwise disqualify them from service. Overall the majority are moral waivers, which include some felonies, misdemeanors, and traffic and drug offenses.
The number of felony waivers granted by the Army grew from 411 in 2003 to 901 in 2006, according to the Pentagon, or about one in 10 of the moral waivers approved that year. Other misdemeanors, which could be petty theft, writing a bad check or some assaults, jumped from about 2,700 to more than 6,000 in 2006. The minor crimes represented more than three-quarters of the moral waivers granted by the Army in 2006, up from more than half in 2003.
Army and Defense Department officials defended the waiver program as a way to admit young people who may have made a mistake early in life but have overcome past behavior. And they said about two-thirds of the waivers granted by the Marines are for drug use, because they - unlike the other services - require a waiver if someone has been convicted once for marijuana use.
Lawmakers and other observers say they are concerned that the struggle to fill the military ranks in this time of war has forced the services to lower their moral standards.
"The data is crystal clear. Our armed forces are under incredible strain and the only way that they can fill their recruiting quotas is by lowering their standards," said Rep. Marty Meehan, D-Mass., who has been working to get additional data from the Pentagon. "By lowering standards, we are endangering the rest of our armed forces and sending the wrong message to potential recruits across the country."
Army spokesman Paul Boyce said Tuesday he is concerned because the Pentagon data differs from Army numbers. But overall, he said, "anything that is considered a risk or a serious infraction of the law is given the highest level of review."
"Our goal is to make certain that we recruit quality young men and women who can keep America defended against its enemies," Boyce said.
The data was obtained through a federal information request and released by the California-based Michael D. Palm Center, a think tank that studies military issues.
"The fact that the military has allowed more than 100,000 people with such troubled pasts to join its ranks over the past three years illustrates the problem we're having meeting our military needs in this time of war," said Aaron Belkin, director of the center.
Belkin said a new study commissioned by the center also concludes that the military does not have any programs that help convicted felons adjust to military life.
In recent years, as the Iraq and Afghanistan wars have dragged on, the military has also relaxed some standards in order to meet recruitment demands. The Army, for example, increased its age limit for recruits from 35 to 42, and is accepting more people whose scores on a standardized aptitude test are at the lower end of the acceptable range.
In its report, the Pentagon said, "The waiver process recognizes that some young people have made mistakes, have overcome their past behavior, and have clearly demonstrated the potential for being productive, law-abiding citizens and members of the military."
According to the Pentagon, nearly a quarter of new military recruits needed some type of waiver in 2006, up from 20 percent in 2003. Roughly 30,000 moral waivers were approved each year between 2003 and 2006.
The military in its report divides moral waivers into six categories: felonies, serious and minor non-traffic offenses, serious and minor traffic offenses and drug offenses. Because many states have different crimes categorized as a felony or misdemeanor, the groupings are more general.
About one in five Army recruits needed a waiver to enlist in 2006, up from 12.7 percent in 2003. In addition, the report showed that the Army granted substantially fewer waivers for drug use and serious traffic violations last year than in 2003.
More than half of the Marine recruits needed a waiver in 2006, a bit higher than in 2003, and largely due to their more strict drug requirements. Felony waivers made up about 2 percent of the Marine waivers, while other lesser crimes made up about 25 percent, both up slightly from 2003.
About 18 percent of Navy recruits required a waiver, up only slightly from 2003. Two-thirds of the waivers granted by the Navy were for misdemeanor-type crimes and about 5 percent were for felonies.
Just 8 percent of Air Force recruits had waivers, down a bit from 2003. Nearly all of the waivers were for the misdemeanor-type crimes.
If you know an Oklahoma veteran or someone who is currently serving let us know their name so we can thank them personally for the sacrifices they've made and are making for us and invite them to join our ODP Veterans and Military Families Committee.
No More Blank Checks for Bush
(Watch the House debate on CSPAN. Read today's top story on the debate from the Washington Post below. Comment on the resolution, the debate, or the war on this blog.)
House Begins Debate On War
A Partisan Divide On Bush Troop Plan
By Jonathan Weisman
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, February 14, 2007; A01
The House plunged into a heated, partisan debate yesterday on President Bush's war policy, with Democrats challenging lawmakers to take a stand against the deployment of more troops to Iraq while Republicans accused their political foes of emboldening the enemy with their symbolic resolution.
Democrats won control of Congress last fall in a political backlash against Bush's Iraq policy, and yesterday they decried a war they said was illegitimately launched and has been badly managed, with devastating consequences. They were helped by three newly elected Democratic lawmakers who were propelled into politics by their military experience in Iraq.
"We stand together to tell this administration that we are against the escalation, and to say with one voice that Congress will no longer be a blank check to the president's failed policies," said freshman Rep. Patrick J. Murphy (D-Pa.), who was a captain with the 82nd Airborne Division in Baghdad. "The president's plan to send more of our best and bravest to die refereeing a civil war in Iraq is wrong."
Republicans focused on loftier themes, warning darkly about ceding Iraq to Islamic radicals who are bent on destroying not only the Middle East but also the American way of life. "We are engaged in a global war now for our very way of life," said House Minority Leader John A. Boehner (R-Ohio). "And every drop of blood that's been spilled in defense of liberty and freedom from the American Revolution to this very moment is for nothing if we're unwilling to stand up and fight this threat."
Scores of Democratic and Republican lawmakers took to the floor on the first of what is likely to be three days of intense debate on a tightly worded resolution opposing Bush's decision to deploy more than 20,000 additional U.S. combat troops to Iraq.
The resolution affirms Congress's support for "the members of the United States Armed Forces who are serving or who have served bravely and honorably in Iraq" before breaking with the president's new strategy.
The debate is expected to extend late into the night today and tomorrow before culminating in a House vote Friday. It is not the first extended House debate on the war, but it is the first since the invasion of Iraq nearly four years ago that is likely to conclude with a vote against the president.
"In a few days and in fewer than 100 words, we will take our country in a new direction on Iraq," pledged House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.). "Friday's vote will signal whether the House has heard the American people: No more blank checks for President Bush on Iraq."
The House debate unfolded in an orderly, dignified fashion, in stark contrast to last week's tumult in the Senate, where Republicans blocked even a debate on the war resolution. Under House rules that heavily favor the majority, Democrats set the terms of the debate and even denied Republicans the opportunity to introduce an alternative measure. By the end of the week, only the Democratic resolution will come to a vote in the House, despite party leaders' pledges last week to give Republicans at least one vote.
The Democratic resolution is not binding on the administration, and both sides of the debate agreed that the real fight will come next month, when Democrats are to move to attach to a $100 billion war spending bill binding language that would limit future deployments to Iraq and begin to bring troops home.
Still, passage of the resolution this week would be a stinging repudiation of Bush's strategy to try to put down sectarian violence in Baghdad by bolstering troop levels, and Republicans struggled to discredit the importance of the measure.
Boehner denounced it "a political charade lacking both the seriousness and the gravity of the issue that it's meant to represent," even as he called the resolution "the first step toward abandoning Iraq."
House Republican Conference Chairman Adam Putnam (Fla.) decried "a rather toothless 97 words" that "does nothing to help win the war" and "doesn't do anything to help stop it, either." Yet minutes later, he warned that its passage "puts us one day closer to handing militant Islamists a safe haven the size of California."
In a formal letter to GOP colleagues, Reps. Peter Hoekstra (Mich.) and John Shadegg (Ariz.) encouraged lawmakers to avoid discussing the resolution and focus instead on a wider war against Islamic radicals.
"This debate should not be about the surge or its details," they wrote. "This debate should not even be about the Iraq war to date, mistakes that have been made, or whether we can, or cannot, win militarily. If we let Democrats force us into a debate on the surge or the current situation in Iraq, we lose."
Democrats, torn between their liberal wing wanting binding action to stop the war and their more cautious conservatives, were no less conflicted. Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Tom Lantos (Calif.) promised that passage of the resolution would be only a first step toward ending what he called "this nightmare." But he also put Friday's vote in the starkest possible terms.
"This simple resolution will establish the first marker," Lantos said. "Those who want to draw down the U.S. presence will be on one side of that marker. Those who want to take further steps into the quagmire will be on the other."
Democratic leaders showcased the three veterans of the Iraq war in a bid to enhance the credibility of their case. Rep. Joe Sestak (D-Pa.) brought to the debate the credentials of a retired admiral who commanded an aircraft-carrier battle group in Iraq. He condemned "the continuing use of our national treasure in what is an inconclusive, open-ended involvement within a country where the long-term benefits do not match what we need to reap."
Rep. Tim Walz (D-Minn.) fretted over the National Guardsmen he taught in high school and then trained for deployment to the war.
Said Murphy: "We often hear from our colleagues on the other side that the only way to support the troops is to blindly support the president. I ask anyone to look at Admiral Joe Sestak, a man who was responsible for the safety and security of 15,000 sailors and Marines, and tell him that he does not support the troops. I ask anyone to look at Sergeant Major Tim Walz -- a man who served his country for 24 years in the Minnesota National Guard as a noncommissioned officer, the backbone of our Army -- and tell him he does not support our troops."
"We are the troops," he concluded, "and we oppose the president's escalation of troops."
Staff writer Shailagh Murray contributed to this report.
Tuesday, February 13, 2007
Edmond Sun Profile: Pete Regan
Read a great profile of Democrat Pete Regan in the Edmond Sun. Pete ran a great campaign this last election cycle for Lt. Governor before Jari Askins secured the nomination. Pete is a champion of issues Democrats hold dear -- health coverage, education and minimum wage. I hope he opts to seek public office again in the future.
Bill to Protect Grieving Families of War Casualties Advances
A bill that would put a larger protective barrier around grieving families of war casualties received a unanimous vote today in a Senate committee. Senate Bill 756 would increase the distance protesters at funerals must be from ceremonies and cemeteries; the measure also would triple the time before and after the ceremony when protests would be allowed. The measure was approved without opposition by the Senate Judiciary Committee and next will be considered by the full Senate.
The bill, by Senator Jay Paul Gumm, would strengthen a law already on the books banning protesters at the funerals of those soldiers killed in the line of duty. The original law was enacted as a response to a radical fringe group from Topeka, Kan. that travels the country protesting military funerals.
Read More.
The Iraq Resolution
President Bush's plan to escalate the war in Iraq will not bring success in Iraq or make America more secure. It faces significant bipartisan opposition in both chambers of Congress, and the plan is opposed by the vast majority of the country.
The House will begin debate today on a resolution regarding the President's plan to escalate the war. Recent polling shows that a majority of Americans are paying close attention to the unfolding debate in the Congress about the war in Iraq.
The vote on the resolution will likely take place on Friday. The House will hold more than three full days of debate on the resolution in which every member's voice will be heard.
The House resolution highlights our support for our troops, and our opposition to the President's troop increase. The language for the resolution can be found at: http://www.house.gov/hasc/ and http://www.foreignaffairs.house.gov/.
Pure and simple, the President's policy to escalate the war will be debated on the House floor. The resolution will provide every member of the House an opportunity to vote for or against the President's plan to send more troops to Iraq. House Republicans will have opportunities in the coming weeks and months to offer alternative resolutions regarding the war.
The majority of the country opposes escalation, and would like to see American troops home soon.
A number of members of the caucus have expressed interest in speaking in blocks, or at similar times to highlight some key issues - support of our troops, effectiveness of past surges, and accountability and oversight of the war. Veterans, Blue Dogs and members of relevant committees including the Armed Services and Foreign Affairs will speak on the floor in blocks of time to draw attention to these critical issues.
This resolution is just a beginning of our oversight and efforts to hold the President accountable for his mismanagement of the war in Iraq. We will continue to ask the tough questions about the President's new strategy and continue to insist on a new direction, while always putting our troops first.
Senate Republicans were wrong to block resolutions on the President's escalation of the war in Iraq. The American people want a clear, forceful statement from Congress on the President's plan to escalate the war. We will not allow Republicans to muddy the waters.
President Bush's plan to escalate the war in Iraq will not bring success in Iraq or make America more secure. It faces significant bipartisan opposition in both chambers of Congress, and the plan is opposed by the vast majority of the country.
The House will begin debate today on a resolution regarding the President's plan to escalate the war. Recent polling shows that a majority of Americans are paying close attention to the unfolding debate in the Congress about the war in Iraq.
The vote on the resolution will likely take place on Friday. The House will hold more than three full days of debate on the resolution in which every member's voice will be heard.
The House resolution highlights our support for our troops, and our opposition to the President's troop increase. The language for the resolution can be found at: http://www.house.gov/hasc/ and http://www.foreignaffairs.house.gov/.
Pure and simple, the President's policy to escalate the war will be debated on the House floor. The resolution will provide every member of the House an opportunity to vote for or against the President's plan to send more troops to Iraq. House Republicans will have opportunities in the coming weeks and months to offer alternative resolutions regarding the war.
The majority of the country opposes escalation, and would like to see American troops home soon.
A number of members of the caucus have expressed interest in speaking in blocks, or at similar times to highlight some key issues - support of our troops, effectiveness of past surges, and accountability and oversight of the war. Veterans, Blue Dogs and members of relevant committees including the Armed Services and Foreign Affairs will speak on the floor in blocks of time to draw attention to these critical issues.
This resolution is just a beginning of our oversight and efforts to hold the President accountable for his mismanagement of the war in Iraq. We will continue to ask the tough questions about the President's new strategy and continue to insist on a new direction, while always putting our troops first.
Senate Republicans were wrong to block resolutions on the President's escalation of the war in Iraq. The American people want a clear, forceful statement from Congress on the President's plan to escalate the war. We will not allow Republicans to muddy the waters.
Black History Month
Salvation for a race, nation, or class must come from within. Freedom is never granted; it is won. Justice is never given; it is exacted. Freedom and justice must be struggled for by the oppressed of all lands and races, and the struggle must be continuous, for freedom is never a final fact, but a continuing evolving process to higher and higher levels of human, social, economic, political and religious relationships.
A. PHILIP RANDOLPH
Salvation for a race, nation, or class must come from within. Freedom is never granted; it is won. Justice is never given; it is exacted. Freedom and justice must be struggled for by the oppressed of all lands and races, and the struggle must be continuous, for freedom is never a final fact, but a continuing evolving process to higher and higher levels of human, social, economic, political and religious relationships.
A. PHILIP RANDOLPH
Monday, February 12, 2007
North Metro Federation of Democratic Women
These ladies from the North Metro Federation of Democratic Women met at the ODP HQ on Saturday morning. They agreed that "When Women Vote, Democrats Win."
Thanks ladies for your commitment to Democrats!
State Convention Arrangements Committee
A special thanks to the members of the 2007 State Convention Arrangements Committee pictured above at our planning session Saturday at the ODP HQ...an thanks to Kitti for providing a fabulous meal for us as we selected menu items and other esssentials for your next ODP State Convention!
(Pictured l to r Rae Weese, CD1; Judy Calhoun, CD4; Cerita Morley, CD2; Kitti Asberry, CD5 and Committee Chair; Susan McCann and Dianne Hunter, CD5.)
Bill to Protect Military Personnel from Predatory Lending Dies in Committee
State Senator Andrew Rice said his measure to protect Oklahoma’s military personnel from predatory lending is dead for the session after failing to receive passage from a Senate committee on Monday. Rice said Senate Bill 807 would have established safeguards to help consumers, military and non-military citizens from being caught in a cycle of chronic borrowing.
“I am disappointed that my bill died in committee because of a tie vote,” said Rice, D-Oklahoma City. “At the request of the Department of Defense, Congress passed similar legislation and President Bush signed it into law. My bill would have empowered our local authorities to have the statutory ability to protect our military personnel at bases like Tinker and Vance from these dangerous lending practices.”
Read More.
State Senator Andrew Rice said his measure to protect Oklahoma’s military personnel from predatory lending is dead for the session after failing to receive passage from a Senate committee on Monday. Rice said Senate Bill 807 would have established safeguards to help consumers, military and non-military citizens from being caught in a cycle of chronic borrowing.
“I am disappointed that my bill died in committee because of a tie vote,” said Rice, D-Oklahoma City. “At the request of the Department of Defense, Congress passed similar legislation and President Bush signed it into law. My bill would have empowered our local authorities to have the statutory ability to protect our military personnel at bases like Tinker and Vance from these dangerous lending practices.”
Read More.
Red Shirts
(from a friend)
Last week, while traveling to Chicago on business, I
noticed a Marine Sergeant traveling with a folded flag,
but did not put two and two together. After we boarded
our flight, I turned to the Sergeant, who'd been invited
to sit in First Class (across from me), and inquired if he
was heading home.
No, he responded.
Heading out I asked?
No. I'm escorting a soldier home.
Going to pick him up?
No. He is with me right now. He was killed in Iraq I'm
taking him home to his family.
The realization of what he had been asked to do hit me
like a punch to the gut. It was an honor for him.
He told me that, although he didn't know the soldier,
he had delivered the news of his passing to the
soldier's family and felt as if he knew them after
many conversations in so few days. I turned back to him,
extended my hand, and said, Thank You. Thank you for
doing what you do so my family and I can do what we do.
Upon landing in Chicago the pilot stopped short of the
gate and made the following announcement over the intercom.
"Ladies and gentlemen, I would like to note that we
have had the honor of having Sergeant Steeley of the
United States Marine Corps join us on this flight.
He is escorting a fallen comrade back home to his family.
I ask that you please remain in your seats when we open
the forward door to allow Sergeant Steeley to deplane
and receive his fellow soldier. We will then turn off
the seat belt sign."
Without a sound, all went as requested. I noticed the
sergeant saluting the casket as it was brought off the
plane, and his action made me realize that I am proud
to be an American. So here's a public 'Thank You" to
our military Men and Women for what you do so we can
live the way we do.
Red Fridays.
Very soon, you will see a great many people wearing
Red every Friday. The reason? Americans who support
our troops used to be called the "silent majority."
We are no longer silent, and are voicing our love for
God, country and home in record breaking numbers. We
are not organized, boisterous or overbearing.
Many Americans, like you, me and all our friends,
simply want to recognize that the vast majority of
America supports our troops. Our idea of showing
solidarity and support for our troops with dignity and
respect starts this Friday -- and continues each and
every Friday until the troops all come home, sending a
deafening message that ... every red-blooded American
who supports our men and women afar, will wear
something red.
By word of mouth, press, TV -- let's make the United
States on every Friday a sea of red much like a
homecoming football game in the bleachers. If every
one of us who loves this country will share this with
acquaintances, coworkers, friends, and family, it will
not be long before the USA is covered in RED and it
will let our troops know the once "silent" majority is
on their side more than ever, certainly more than the
media lets on.
The first thing a soldier says when asked "What can
we do to make things better for you?" is ..."We need
your support and your prayers." Let's get the word out
and lead with class and dignity, by example, and wear
something red every Friday.
(from a friend)
Last week, while traveling to Chicago on business, I
noticed a Marine Sergeant traveling with a folded flag,
but did not put two and two together. After we boarded
our flight, I turned to the Sergeant, who'd been invited
to sit in First Class (across from me), and inquired if he
was heading home.
No, he responded.
Heading out I asked?
No. I'm escorting a soldier home.
Going to pick him up?
No. He is with me right now. He was killed in Iraq I'm
taking him home to his family.
The realization of what he had been asked to do hit me
like a punch to the gut. It was an honor for him.
He told me that, although he didn't know the soldier,
he had delivered the news of his passing to the
soldier's family and felt as if he knew them after
many conversations in so few days. I turned back to him,
extended my hand, and said, Thank You. Thank you for
doing what you do so my family and I can do what we do.
Upon landing in Chicago the pilot stopped short of the
gate and made the following announcement over the intercom.
"Ladies and gentlemen, I would like to note that we
have had the honor of having Sergeant Steeley of the
United States Marine Corps join us on this flight.
He is escorting a fallen comrade back home to his family.
I ask that you please remain in your seats when we open
the forward door to allow Sergeant Steeley to deplane
and receive his fellow soldier. We will then turn off
the seat belt sign."
Without a sound, all went as requested. I noticed the
sergeant saluting the casket as it was brought off the
plane, and his action made me realize that I am proud
to be an American. So here's a public 'Thank You" to
our military Men and Women for what you do so we can
live the way we do.
Red Fridays.
Very soon, you will see a great many people wearing
Red every Friday. The reason? Americans who support
our troops used to be called the "silent majority."
We are no longer silent, and are voicing our love for
God, country and home in record breaking numbers. We
are not organized, boisterous or overbearing.
Many Americans, like you, me and all our friends,
simply want to recognize that the vast majority of
America supports our troops. Our idea of showing
solidarity and support for our troops with dignity and
respect starts this Friday -- and continues each and
every Friday until the troops all come home, sending a
deafening message that ... every red-blooded American
who supports our men and women afar, will wear
something red.
By word of mouth, press, TV -- let's make the United
States on every Friday a sea of red much like a
homecoming football game in the bleachers. If every
one of us who loves this country will share this with
acquaintances, coworkers, friends, and family, it will
not be long before the USA is covered in RED and it
will let our troops know the once "silent" majority is
on their side more than ever, certainly more than the
media lets on.
The first thing a soldier says when asked "What can
we do to make things better for you?" is ..."We need
your support and your prayers." Let's get the word out
and lead with class and dignity, by example, and wear
something red every Friday.
Bush Budget Shortchanges America's Veterans---Again
A new analysis of President Bush's $2.9 trillion dollar budget shows that the Bush Administration has once again shortchanged the brave men and women who have served in our armed forces and their families. According to a report by the Democratic Policy Committee, the President's budget once again forces veterans to pay more out of their own pockets for health care, underestimates the needs of service members returning from Iraq and Afghanistan, and under-funds key research, training, and management programs.
Don Fowler, co-chair of the DNC's Veterans and Military Families Council and an Army veteran with 30 years of active and reserve experience, issued the following statement responding to the President's budget:
"As has become too common under this President's failed leadership, the Bush White House is once again sticking it to the brave men and women who have served our country. President Bush's budget drastically shortchanges America's veterans yet again. As a result, increased health care enrollment fees and co-payments could force nearly 110,000 veterans away from the VA system, while doubling out-of-pocket costs for prescription drugs could deny many the medicines they need. President Bush continues to demonstrate that despite all his empty rhetoric, keeping America's promise to our veterans is simply not one of his priorities.
"The brave men and women who put their lives on the line defending America should not have to fight Republican budget cuts that undermine their economic security when their service is done. The new Democratic leadership in Congress understands this, and is committed to protecting our veterans and military families. President Bush has a responsibility to honor the service and sacrifice of the brave men and women who fought to defend our freedoms by joining Democrats in fighting to provide them the benefits they earned."
The following is a fact sheet from the Democratic Policy Committee on the impact of President Bush's misplaced priorities on America's veterans and military families:
The President's Budget Shortchanges Our Nation's Veterans
Democratic Policy Committee
February 8, 2007
Despite proposed increases, the President's Fiscal Year 2008 budget for the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) does not provide adequate funding for the services and benefits our veterans have earned, nor does it address pressing management and operational challenges undermining VA efficiency and accessibility. The President's budget once again calls on veterans to pay more out of their own pockets for health care, underestimates the needs of service members returning from Iraq and Afghanistan, and under funds key research, training, and management programs necessary to provide efficient and quality service to veterans.
It is our fundamental obligation to ensure that the VA is able to meet the needs of returning service members, keep pace with growing operational costs and satisfy rising needs while also ensuring quality service. The Bush Administration often talks about its support for our troops yet it continues to fall short of its commitment to caring for our service members when they return home.
The President's proposed funding level for VA medical care is not sufficient to meet the needs of veterans and would attempt to levy unjust health care fees on many veterans, in an effort to help balance the budget. While the requested medical care budget is $2 billion above Fiscal Year 2007 levels, after factoring in health care inflation and increased patient utilization rates, it amounts to a mere .14 percent increase over last year's allocation. This minimal and inadequate increase raises real concerns about whether the proposed budget will be able to meet the demands of new enrollees or allow for vital new initiatives, including enhancements to mental health services for OIF/OEF veterans.
Specifically, the President's budget would:
Nearly double the prescription drug co-payment for approximately two million middle income veterans who suffer from non-service related disabilities (Priority 7 and 8 veterans), which would increase the cost of prescriptions for these veterans from $8 to $15 per month.
Impose a new enrollment fee on Priority 7 and 8 veterans, on a graduated scale of $250-$750 per year, based on veterans' family income level. While the Bush Administration claims the enrollment fee and co-payment increase would apply only to middle and upper-income veterans, the reality is that they would apply to Priority 7 and 8 veterans whose annual income is as low as $27,790. Further, for the first time, this year's proposal would use family income - rather than individual income - as the basis for calculating these fees. As a result of the enrollment fee and co-payment increase, the VA estimates that nearly 110,000 veterans would be driven away from the VA system.
Provide minimal funds for enhancements in specialized VA health care programs, including mental health/substance abuse treatment, rehabilitative care for critically wounded service members, and readjustment counseling.
Redirect revenues - an estimated $492 million - generated from increased prescription drug co-pay and enrollment fees to the U.S. Treasury, rather than reinvest in VA services, as proposed in past years. This transfer of funds appears to be an effort to help balance the overall budget.
Underestimate the needs of veterans from Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) and Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF). While the President's request of $752 million to provide health care services for returning Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans represents an increase over current spending levels for these veterans, it is projected that this allocation will fall significantly short of real demand. The Senate Veterans' Affairs Committee Majority staff estimates that VA projections that anticipate it will service only an additional 54,000 OIF/OEF veterans during Fiscal Year 2008 could be 50,000 patients short of actual demand. (Veterans' Affairs Committee Staff, 2/05/07)
Reduce the VA research budget by $2.7 million, to provide a total funding level of $411 million for medical and prosthetic research. The VA research program provides important contributions to the larger medical community and is one of the Department's key recruitment and retention tools.
Fall short of estimates provided by veterans' service organizations in their Fiscal Year 2008 Independent Budget.
Continue a ban on new "middle-income" veterans enrolling for care. Since the ban was enacted in Fiscal Year 2003, as many as one million veterans have been turned away from VA hospitals and clinics. (Veterans Health Administration, Office of the Assistant Deputy Under Secretary for Health).
Charge co-payments to veterans who already pay co-payments through third-party insurers which would, in effect, force these veterans to pay twice for the same coverage.
The Bush budget fails to provide a plan or sufficient resources for the VA to overcome its caseload backlog and mitigate the effects of anticipated baby boom retirees from the federal service. The President's budget would:
Fail to provide sufficient funds for staffing and training in the Veterans Benefits Administration to address a claims backlog that is quickly approaching one million. (Veterans of Foreign Wars press release, February 5, 2007)
Potentially underestimate the number of claims that will be filed in Fiscal Year 2008, due to the rising numbers of service members returning from Iraq and Afghanistan, and the pending outcome of the Haas case (concerning Agent Orange claims from Navy personnel in Viet Nam). VA has stated that if that case is not overturned, there will likely be 200,000 new claims filed.
Fail to provide sufficient funding for the recruiting, hiring, and training of VA staff to replace baby-boomer generation retirees from the federal service over the next five years, which will impact the efficiency and quality of claims decisions.
The Bush budget fails to provide adequate resources to train those who work with veterans to secure employment, or to help veterans to become employed. The President's budget for the Department of Labor would:
Freeze funding for the National Veterans' Training Institute, which provides specialized training and professional skills development to federal and state veterans' service providers' staff.
Virtually flatline of the Homeless Veterans' Reintegration Program, which provides grants to operate employment programs to reach out to homeless veterans and help them become employed.
Decrease funding for the Veterans Workforce Investment Program, which provides competitive grants for training programs and employment opportunities for veterans in high-skill occupations.
NOTE: Spending cuts are calculated relative to the CR for FY 2007 passed by the House of Representatives, adjusted for inflation.
A new analysis of President Bush's $2.9 trillion dollar budget shows that the Bush Administration has once again shortchanged the brave men and women who have served in our armed forces and their families. According to a report by the Democratic Policy Committee, the President's budget once again forces veterans to pay more out of their own pockets for health care, underestimates the needs of service members returning from Iraq and Afghanistan, and under-funds key research, training, and management programs.
Don Fowler, co-chair of the DNC's Veterans and Military Families Council and an Army veteran with 30 years of active and reserve experience, issued the following statement responding to the President's budget:
"As has become too common under this President's failed leadership, the Bush White House is once again sticking it to the brave men and women who have served our country. President Bush's budget drastically shortchanges America's veterans yet again. As a result, increased health care enrollment fees and co-payments could force nearly 110,000 veterans away from the VA system, while doubling out-of-pocket costs for prescription drugs could deny many the medicines they need. President Bush continues to demonstrate that despite all his empty rhetoric, keeping America's promise to our veterans is simply not one of his priorities.
"The brave men and women who put their lives on the line defending America should not have to fight Republican budget cuts that undermine their economic security when their service is done. The new Democratic leadership in Congress understands this, and is committed to protecting our veterans and military families. President Bush has a responsibility to honor the service and sacrifice of the brave men and women who fought to defend our freedoms by joining Democrats in fighting to provide them the benefits they earned."
The following is a fact sheet from the Democratic Policy Committee on the impact of President Bush's misplaced priorities on America's veterans and military families:
The President's Budget Shortchanges Our Nation's Veterans
Democratic Policy Committee
February 8, 2007
Despite proposed increases, the President's Fiscal Year 2008 budget for the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) does not provide adequate funding for the services and benefits our veterans have earned, nor does it address pressing management and operational challenges undermining VA efficiency and accessibility. The President's budget once again calls on veterans to pay more out of their own pockets for health care, underestimates the needs of service members returning from Iraq and Afghanistan, and under funds key research, training, and management programs necessary to provide efficient and quality service to veterans.
It is our fundamental obligation to ensure that the VA is able to meet the needs of returning service members, keep pace with growing operational costs and satisfy rising needs while also ensuring quality service. The Bush Administration often talks about its support for our troops yet it continues to fall short of its commitment to caring for our service members when they return home.
The President's proposed funding level for VA medical care is not sufficient to meet the needs of veterans and would attempt to levy unjust health care fees on many veterans, in an effort to help balance the budget. While the requested medical care budget is $2 billion above Fiscal Year 2007 levels, after factoring in health care inflation and increased patient utilization rates, it amounts to a mere .14 percent increase over last year's allocation. This minimal and inadequate increase raises real concerns about whether the proposed budget will be able to meet the demands of new enrollees or allow for vital new initiatives, including enhancements to mental health services for OIF/OEF veterans.
Specifically, the President's budget would:
Nearly double the prescription drug co-payment for approximately two million middle income veterans who suffer from non-service related disabilities (Priority 7 and 8 veterans), which would increase the cost of prescriptions for these veterans from $8 to $15 per month.
Impose a new enrollment fee on Priority 7 and 8 veterans, on a graduated scale of $250-$750 per year, based on veterans' family income level. While the Bush Administration claims the enrollment fee and co-payment increase would apply only to middle and upper-income veterans, the reality is that they would apply to Priority 7 and 8 veterans whose annual income is as low as $27,790. Further, for the first time, this year's proposal would use family income - rather than individual income - as the basis for calculating these fees. As a result of the enrollment fee and co-payment increase, the VA estimates that nearly 110,000 veterans would be driven away from the VA system.
Provide minimal funds for enhancements in specialized VA health care programs, including mental health/substance abuse treatment, rehabilitative care for critically wounded service members, and readjustment counseling.
Redirect revenues - an estimated $492 million - generated from increased prescription drug co-pay and enrollment fees to the U.S. Treasury, rather than reinvest in VA services, as proposed in past years. This transfer of funds appears to be an effort to help balance the overall budget.
Underestimate the needs of veterans from Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) and Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF). While the President's request of $752 million to provide health care services for returning Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans represents an increase over current spending levels for these veterans, it is projected that this allocation will fall significantly short of real demand. The Senate Veterans' Affairs Committee Majority staff estimates that VA projections that anticipate it will service only an additional 54,000 OIF/OEF veterans during Fiscal Year 2008 could be 50,000 patients short of actual demand. (Veterans' Affairs Committee Staff, 2/05/07)
Reduce the VA research budget by $2.7 million, to provide a total funding level of $411 million for medical and prosthetic research. The VA research program provides important contributions to the larger medical community and is one of the Department's key recruitment and retention tools.
Fall short of estimates provided by veterans' service organizations in their Fiscal Year 2008 Independent Budget.
Continue a ban on new "middle-income" veterans enrolling for care. Since the ban was enacted in Fiscal Year 2003, as many as one million veterans have been turned away from VA hospitals and clinics. (Veterans Health Administration, Office of the Assistant Deputy Under Secretary for Health).
Charge co-payments to veterans who already pay co-payments through third-party insurers which would, in effect, force these veterans to pay twice for the same coverage.
The Bush budget fails to provide a plan or sufficient resources for the VA to overcome its caseload backlog and mitigate the effects of anticipated baby boom retirees from the federal service. The President's budget would:
Fail to provide sufficient funds for staffing and training in the Veterans Benefits Administration to address a claims backlog that is quickly approaching one million. (Veterans of Foreign Wars press release, February 5, 2007)
Potentially underestimate the number of claims that will be filed in Fiscal Year 2008, due to the rising numbers of service members returning from Iraq and Afghanistan, and the pending outcome of the Haas case (concerning Agent Orange claims from Navy personnel in Viet Nam). VA has stated that if that case is not overturned, there will likely be 200,000 new claims filed.
Fail to provide sufficient funding for the recruiting, hiring, and training of VA staff to replace baby-boomer generation retirees from the federal service over the next five years, which will impact the efficiency and quality of claims decisions.
The Bush budget fails to provide adequate resources to train those who work with veterans to secure employment, or to help veterans to become employed. The President's budget for the Department of Labor would:
Freeze funding for the National Veterans' Training Institute, which provides specialized training and professional skills development to federal and state veterans' service providers' staff.
Virtually flatline of the Homeless Veterans' Reintegration Program, which provides grants to operate employment programs to reach out to homeless veterans and help them become employed.
Decrease funding for the Veterans Workforce Investment Program, which provides competitive grants for training programs and employment opportunities for veterans in high-skill occupations.
NOTE: Spending cuts are calculated relative to the CR for FY 2007 passed by the House of Representatives, adjusted for inflation.
Whereas
A very important part of the upcoming precinct meetings on March 8th will be the beginning of our resolutions process. This is the process whereby grassroots Democrats can submit, in writing, their proposals for recognizing, supporting, or opposing an individual, an action, or issue.
Take for example the recent Resolution passed by the DNC commemorating the life of Molly Ivins. These "whereas whereas whereas therefore be it resolved" statements can literally be the heart and soul of grassroots activity and ultimately assist us in formulating a statement of beliefs and "platform".
This year we will provide a template for writing resolutions to streamline the process of review of resolutions at the county, district and state level. This form will be available soon. But in the meantime, take a look at the format the DNC uses by reading through the most recent resolutions on the DNC website. For the resolutions click here.
State Convention 2007
Thanks to the ODP 2007 State Convention Arrangements Committee for their hard work Saturday at the ODP HQ. They have promised to make this the best state convention Oklahoma Democrats ever --- they are organizing for a top notch event that will address our important business and allow us to celebrate our successes and establish priorites for our future.
We will make arrangement recommendations to the State Central Committee on Saturday at our quarterly meeting at the ODP HQ. I am hopeful that the SCC will approve the recommended schedule of events. As it stands now we're recommending that registration and credentialing begin at 5 p.m. on Friday, May 18th before the ODP Celebration for our delegates at the Cox Convention Center from 7 to 10 p.m. The Celebration will include light appetizers, a cash bar, and a live band. Registration and credentialling will continue Saturday morning at 8 a.m. at the Bricktown Coca-Cola Center prior to the opening of the convention's first general session at 9 a.m. According to our constitution and by-laws we will open with speeches from elected officials and will follow with required reports and state officer and affirmative action member elections. Elections will continue through the day and we expect to adjourn the first general session at 4:30 p.m. The Activist Hall of Fame Dinner will be held preceded by a reception at the Cox Convention Center beginning at 6 p.m. with dinner at 7 p.m. The second general session is scheduled to begin at 9 a.m. Sunday and conclude at noon. This session will be preceded by an interdenominational worship service from 8 to 9 a.m. at the Bricktown Coca-Cola Center. The second general session is reserved for resolutions and any other unfinished business of the state convention.
Finalized details will be announced as soon as all are approved.
I have asked Oklahoma County Democratic Party Chair Kitti Asberry to lead the arrangements committee. She is being assisted by Rae Weese, CD 1; Cerita Morley, CD 2; Anita Norman, CD 3; Judy Calhoun, CD 4; Dianne Hunter and Susan McCann, CD 5; Steve VanHook, Stonewall Democrats; and Mandy Winton, Young Democrats.
If you have questions about the 2007 State Convention or want to be an event sponsor please email us at stateconvention2007@okdemocrats.org.
A. Philip Randolph March on Washington
Black History Month
In concert with their fellow workers, black people can take decisive control of their own destinies; with a union, they can approach their employers as proud and upright equals, not as trembling and bowing slaves. Indeed, a solid union contract is, in a very real sense, another Emancipation Proclamation.
A. Philip Randolph
In concert with their fellow workers, black people can take decisive control of their own destinies; with a union, they can approach their employers as proud and upright equals, not as trembling and bowing slaves. Indeed, a solid union contract is, in a very real sense, another Emancipation Proclamation.
A. Philip Randolph
GOP doesn't like their Options
On our side, I watched Obama's speech this weekend and I was proud of him. Just last summer I stood on those same steps in Springfield, and marveled at the sense of history there. Maybe new history was made on those steps this last weekend...
ODP Interns
The ODP is pleased to announce that we have seven interns for the spring semester. (Thanks Courtney for recruiting and working with these fabulous young Democrats!) They've each been assigned a presidential candidate and specific state legislators they will be tracking as the semester progresses.
We've given them blogging privileges for OK Blue Notes to post stories about their assigned candidates and legislators and to continue our efforts to expand outreach to young voters. (Youth vote is a growing force and at the ODP we are reaching out online through Facebook and MySpace to encourage civic engagement and for partybuilding.)
Check in with us often to read what our Next Generation of Democrats is thinking, seeing, believing. (And, thanks again to them for giving their time and talents to the Oklahoma Democratic Party!)
The ODP is pleased to announce that we have seven interns for the spring semester. (Thanks Courtney for recruiting and working with these fabulous young Democrats!) They've each been assigned a presidential candidate and specific state legislators they will be tracking as the semester progresses.
We've given them blogging privileges for OK Blue Notes to post stories about their assigned candidates and legislators and to continue our efforts to expand outreach to young voters. (Youth vote is a growing force and at the ODP we are reaching out online through Facebook and MySpace to encourage civic engagement and for partybuilding.)
Check in with us often to read what our Next Generation of Democrats is thinking, seeing, believing. (And, thanks again to them for giving their time and talents to the Oklahoma Democratic Party!)
Sunday, February 11, 2007
As part of his recently announced presidential campaign, Barak Obama has launched his own online social network, My.BarakObama.com. At the site, users can sign up and create their own profiles, blogs, and events. People that sign up will also be able to find and contact other Obama supporters that are registered at the site. My.BarakObama.com will help augment Obama's official presence on other social sites, such as facebook and YouTube. My.Barak.Obama.com is also the first social network site created by any of the 2008 presidential candidates. This provides a fantastic way for anyone interested in the Barak Obama campaign to really get involved in an innovative way.
- Jordan Endicott
- Jordan Endicott
NPR and PBS
President Bush just proposed drastic cuts to NPR and PBS. We've stopped similar cuts in the past, but enough is enough: With the new Congress, we can make sure this never happens again.
We need Congress to save NPR and PBS once and for all.
Can you help out by signing this petition to Congress? It's really easy -- just click the link below:
Save PBS and NPR petition
President Bush just proposed drastic cuts to NPR and PBS. We've stopped similar cuts in the past, but enough is enough: With the new Congress, we can make sure this never happens again.
We need Congress to save NPR and PBS once and for all.
Can you help out by signing this petition to Congress? It's really easy -- just click the link below:
Save PBS and NPR petition
Boxers or Briefs?
No this isn't about personal choice of undergarments -- it's a brief of comments made by the Oklahoma Congressional delegation to the Oklahoma Press Association's Midwinter Convention in Norman yesterday. One prescribes Prozac for the whole nation and another said Bush is doing what he believes is right for Iraq. Really?
Briefly, in their own words ---
U.S. Rep. Dan Boren, CD2, said everything in President Bush's agenda is tied to the war...a new strategy is needed....past troop surges have not been successful....we need to win the war in Iraq but redefine what winning is. (Thank you Congressman Boren, we must redefine what winning is and change course, which means changing some policy. I am confident that you and the other Democrats in Congress are making the protection of Americans and the restoration of our global reputation policy priorities.)
Sen. James Inhofe "If we lose in Iraq, we will have serious problems in this country." (Senator, we have serious problems now. Our brave troops are in the middle of a religious civil war in the middle east and you have mortgaged our children's future and the security of our country to pay for this, this mother of six, one of them a soldier, says we already have serious problems. Stop defending the President's failed policies. Change the course.)
Tom Cole, CD4, says "sometimes you just have to suck it up and get it done." (Congressman, the American people have sucked it up and we are sick of it. Change the course.)
In brief, put the boxing gloves on and get the job done or we'll elect someone else to protect our interests.
Read the story from the Tulsa World below or click here.
Boren says he backs resolution on surge
By BARBARA HOBEROCK World Capitol Bureau
2/11/2007
NORMAN -- U.S. Rep. Dan Boren said Saturday that he supports a resolution opposing a surge of U.S. troops headed for Iraq.
Boren, the only Democrat in the state's congressional delegation, said everything in President Bush's agenda is tied to the war. An immediate withdrawal is not necessary, he said, but a new strategy is needed. Past troop surges have not been successful, he said.
"We do need to win the war in Iraq, but we need to redefine what winning is," Boren said.
A vote is expected in the U.S. House of Representatives this week on a nonbinding resolution expressing disapproval of the president's recent decision to send an additional 21,500 troops to Iraq. The measure also affirms support for the troops.
Speaking at the Oklahoma Press Association's Mid-Winter Convention, other members of the state's congressional delegation expressed support for the president's plan and warned of possible consequences of failing in Iraq.
"If we lose in Iraq, we will have serious problems in this country," said U.S. Sen. Jim Inhofe.
U.S. Rep. Tom Cole said Bush is doing what he believes is right for the country. But Iraqis need to undertake a number of measures to help themselves, he said. About a year ago, the nation had free elections and a government was coming into shape, Cole said. But inside Iraq, things change politically, he said.
Currently, political factions with private militias are working outside the system, Cole said.
Winning means a democratic government, stability and the ability for Iraqis to defend themselves, Cole said.
"Sometimes, you just have to suck it up and get it done," Cole said.
Benchmarks need to be set to ensure the Iraqis are doing their part, he said.
Like Inhofe, Cole believed there were serious consequences for the U.S. if it loses the war. One of those consequences would be terrorists who set up training camps, he said.
Cole said Democrats, who took control of Congress after the November elections, should do something about the war rather than just complaining about it.
"We know what everyone thinks on Iraq in the U.S. Congress," Cole said. "The real debate on the floor ought to be about policy."
U.S. Sen. Tom Coburn said the country needs to rebuild its confidence.
"We are in a position in this country today, we all need to be on Prozac, we are all so depressed," he said.
To deal with the situation, Coburn said, Congress needs to deal with the real problems like government spending.
Boren, a conservative Democrat, said the delegation works well together.
"Even when we disagree, it is in a very cordial way," Boren said. "We never question each others' patriotism. We want to support the troops."
Also present were U.S. Reps. Frank Lucas and Mary Fallin. U.S. Rep. John Sullivan did not attend.
Saturday, February 10, 2007
Boren Opposes Bush's Troop Escalation
I visited with Pittsburg County Democrats in McAlester on Thursday and most of their questions were about Bush's war in Iraq. Pittsburg County is in the heart of CD2 represented by Rep. Dan Boren. In a story in the Oklahoman today he blasts Bush's troop escalation and calls, again, for benchmarks in the war. In more than one conversation recently I'm hearing strong support for the warriors and strong opposition to the war. Read the story about Boren below.
Boren siding with vote against Bush
By Chris Casteel
Washington Bureau
WASHINGTON — Rep. Dan Boren, a conservative Democrat who has sided with Republicans on many national security votes, said Friday that he will support a resolution expressing disapproval of President Bush's plan to send about 20,000 more troops to Iraq.
"I just think we need to send a message to the president that we need a new strategy,” Boren said in an interview.
But as the House prepares for a three-day debate — scheduled to begin Tuesday — about the president's decision to add troops, Rep. Tom Cole blasted Democrats for pushing a resolution that he called "a political stunt.”
"This is not a useful or helpful exercise,” said Cole, R-Moore. "I think it tells the enemy to keep it up, that there's division at home. I think it makes the American troops wonder: ‘Why are we here?'”
Boren and Cole serve on the House Armed Services Committee and have traveled to Iraq and the U.S. prison in Guantanamo Bay together.
Despite their party differences, they have been allies on many national security issues.
Becoming impatient
But Boren, who has been calling for more than a year for benchmarks to measure progress in Iraq, has become increasingly impatient with the situation in Iraq and doesn't think adding more U.S. troops will help.
"This is a tactic that we have tried in the past and it is one that has not worked,” Boren said. "I hope it works.”
House Democratic leaders have not released the wording of the nonbinding resolution that will be offered on the House floor next week, but Boren said he has been told it will simply state disapproval of the plan to add troops.
A House leader told reporters on Thursday that it will also express support for the troops in the field.
"If that is the case, I will plan to support it,” Boren said, adding that he thinks nearly every Democrat in the House and many Republicans will vote for it.
And Boren, the only Democrat in Oklahoma's congressional delegation, said he thinks the debate is healthy.
Exchange of ideas
"We live in a democracy and it's important to have an exchange of ideas,” he said. "It's refreshing that we now have a Congress where you can have this open debate.”
Cole said House members can debate Iraq in various ways on the House floor without voting on a resolution that has no legal effect.
If Democrats want to change the terms of U.S. involvement in Iraq, he said, they should offer legislation that actually has the force of law.
"They're in the majority now,” Cole said. "This is not about making rhetorical points. It's about making policy.
"I think they ought to be embarrassed by what they're doing — to take up three days of floor time to do nothing.
"If it's not the right thing to have troops there, let's take the steps necessary to bring them home.”
An effort in the Senate last week to bring up a nonbinding resolution on the troop build-up in Iraq was thwarted by Republicans. GOP senators argued that they should be able to offer an alternative expressing support.
Some House Democrats want to see more concrete action taken to challenge the Bush administration on Iraq, and there could be some moves later to restrict funding for the additional troops.
I visited with Pittsburg County Democrats in McAlester on Thursday and most of their questions were about Bush's war in Iraq. Pittsburg County is in the heart of CD2 represented by Rep. Dan Boren. In a story in the Oklahoman today he blasts Bush's troop escalation and calls, again, for benchmarks in the war. In more than one conversation recently I'm hearing strong support for the warriors and strong opposition to the war. Read the story about Boren below.
Boren siding with vote against Bush
By Chris Casteel
Washington Bureau
WASHINGTON — Rep. Dan Boren, a conservative Democrat who has sided with Republicans on many national security votes, said Friday that he will support a resolution expressing disapproval of President Bush's plan to send about 20,000 more troops to Iraq.
"I just think we need to send a message to the president that we need a new strategy,” Boren said in an interview.
But as the House prepares for a three-day debate — scheduled to begin Tuesday — about the president's decision to add troops, Rep. Tom Cole blasted Democrats for pushing a resolution that he called "a political stunt.”
"This is not a useful or helpful exercise,” said Cole, R-Moore. "I think it tells the enemy to keep it up, that there's division at home. I think it makes the American troops wonder: ‘Why are we here?'”
Boren and Cole serve on the House Armed Services Committee and have traveled to Iraq and the U.S. prison in Guantanamo Bay together.
Despite their party differences, they have been allies on many national security issues.
Becoming impatient
But Boren, who has been calling for more than a year for benchmarks to measure progress in Iraq, has become increasingly impatient with the situation in Iraq and doesn't think adding more U.S. troops will help.
"This is a tactic that we have tried in the past and it is one that has not worked,” Boren said. "I hope it works.”
House Democratic leaders have not released the wording of the nonbinding resolution that will be offered on the House floor next week, but Boren said he has been told it will simply state disapproval of the plan to add troops.
A House leader told reporters on Thursday that it will also express support for the troops in the field.
"If that is the case, I will plan to support it,” Boren said, adding that he thinks nearly every Democrat in the House and many Republicans will vote for it.
And Boren, the only Democrat in Oklahoma's congressional delegation, said he thinks the debate is healthy.
Exchange of ideas
"We live in a democracy and it's important to have an exchange of ideas,” he said. "It's refreshing that we now have a Congress where you can have this open debate.”
Cole said House members can debate Iraq in various ways on the House floor without voting on a resolution that has no legal effect.
If Democrats want to change the terms of U.S. involvement in Iraq, he said, they should offer legislation that actually has the force of law.
"They're in the majority now,” Cole said. "This is not about making rhetorical points. It's about making policy.
"I think they ought to be embarrassed by what they're doing — to take up three days of floor time to do nothing.
"If it's not the right thing to have troops there, let's take the steps necessary to bring them home.”
An effort in the Senate last week to bring up a nonbinding resolution on the troop build-up in Iraq was thwarted by Republicans. GOP senators argued that they should be able to offer an alternative expressing support.
Some House Democrats want to see more concrete action taken to challenge the Bush administration on Iraq, and there could be some moves later to restrict funding for the additional troops.
Stop the Funding Immediately
Former Democratic Governor Tom Vilsack is calling on Congress to immediately stop the funding for the Iraq War.
Congress Must Act On Iraq
By Tom Vilsack
Saturday, February 10, 2007; A17
Think of the last time you were in a public place with 1,000 people -- a sports event, a Fourth of July parade, a concert.
Now imagine all 1,000 of those people dead.
If the number of American military deaths in Iraq in recent years is any guide, that's how many Americans will die in that country in the next year if Congress doesn't act immediately to take our troops out of harm's way in Iraq's civil war.
Now imagine the 5,000 more Americans likely to be wounded and maimed if Congress doesn't fulfill its duty to get our young men and women out of Iraq's war zone.
In each of the past three years, more than 820 American soldiers have been killed in the war. Given the increased violence this year, America is on pace to lose more than 1,000 soldiers in Iraq. Over 23,000 American soldiers have been wounded since the war began, nearly 6,000 each year. It is time for us to clearly say that our troops must be brought home now.
Military commanders in Iraq, the Iraq Study Group and the American people have all said the status quo is wrong. Further, the president's closest intelligence and military advisers state in the latest National Intelligence Estimate that Iraq is in the throes of a civil war and that the capacity of U.S. troops to influence the outcome is severely limited. This war will end only with a political solution -- not a military one.
Members of Congress have a constitutional and moral obligation to exercise their authority to stop funding President Bush's failed policy in Iraq. Not eventually, but immediately.
The war in Iraq and the president's mismanagement of our military resources have recklessly endangered our national security and depleted our military and National Guard units across America. By nearly every standard, the homeland security of our country has been weakened and compromised by the president's policies and a lack of congressional oversight.
It has been said that all our options in Iraq are bad, but some options are worse than others. Leaving American troops in harm's way while acknowledging that they have little to accomplish is the worst-case scenario. Congress has the ability to pull our combat brigades out of the most violent areas, maintain a strategic military presence in northern Iraq and bring the rest of our troops home now.
Nearly a year ago, I went to Iraq to hear firsthand from U.S. troops, military leaders and Iraqis.
This is what I heard from our military commanders: If the Iraqi government can't provide better security for its people in six months, U.S. troops in central and southern Iraq should leave. That time has now come and gone -- and so should our servicemen and women who are needlessly in danger.
Unfortunately, this administration refuses to listen to our military leaders or our citizens. So the question is: What will Congress do?
Congress has the constitutional ability and the moral responsibility to pass legislation cutting off funding for the status quo.
Not one soldier will or should be deprived of ammunition or armor.
A modest number of peacekeeping troops would temporarily remain in northern Iraq, protect civilians against sectarian violence, discourage Iran from border incursions and help maintain regional stability -- without recklessly endangering American lives.
As governor, I called 43 Iowa families after their loved ones had been killed in Iraq or Afghanistan. These soldiers and their families made a tremendous sacrifice to protect our freedom and help keep America safe. Make no mistake, our soldiers have done the job they were asked to do, and they have done it well. But too many of these patriots have made the ultimate sacrifice.
Supporting a cap on troops is really just support for staying the course with a failed policy. A toothless congressional resolution is meaningless. And a delay in congressional action will guarantee that more American soldiers will die.
Those who voted for the war, those who voted to continue to support the war and those who voted to continue funding the war can all surely vote to stop the war and do what's right for our military personnel and nation.
Not in 2008 or 2009, but now.
The writer, a former governor of Iowa, is a Democratic candidate for president.
Friday, February 09, 2007
Job Qualifications
It would be my worst nightmare to walk into a job interview and have my potential employer judge me solely on how much money I spent to get there. My clothes are less important than what I have to offer to this employer… right? Impressions are important, yes, but so are credentials. Do I have the qualifications? Do I have experience where experience is necessary? These are the important things when I’m trying to sell myself in the job market.
The same can be said for those running for president. With primaries inching closer every day, the yard signs are coming. Billboards will pop up along the road, and the endless radio and television commercials will be here before we know what hit us. Some things never change. But with all the visibility, will the candidates behind the signs and air-time have the experience that is crucial as this country moves forward?
Bill Richardson, current governor of New Mexico, is one candidate that hopefully can overcome the fluff put out by competitors to show us that he can hit the ground running.
Concerned with the environment? As governor of New Mexico he required that 10 percent of all energy come from renewable sources, and is now guiding the state in moving toward 20 percent. Incentives for such energy programs would not only decrease dependency on foreign sources, but it would also aid in the start to his plan to reverse global warming. During his term as Energy Secretary under the Clinton administration, he implemented efficiency standards to save energy. He’s got experience.
Need a job? Richardson has helped to create 84,000 new jobs in one of the poorest states in America. By creating jobs in industries associated with renewable energy, in the aerospace field and communications, Richardson has impacted not only the economy in New Mexico, but the lives of several thousand in his state. Now imagine that on a national scale. While serving in Congress, he helped in the passage of President Clinton’s economic plan that created millions of jobs, which in turn led to the first balanced budget in America in 30 years.
Foreign policy? Richardson agrees that terrorism is the United States’ number one national security challenge. Richardson’s experience negotiating the release of numerous hostages has given him a sense of respect with many foreign leaders, which is possible to lead to the restoration of America’s standing in the world. He knows what it takes in the real world to make things work, and he has the credentials to prove it. Serving as the Ambassador to the U.N. gave him time to work with world leaders that will be crucial in repairing the United States’ standing in the world. That’s proof.
Just by examining these three points, Bill Richardson has much more experience on his resume than the other candidates running for the Democratic ticket. It appears that he not only has the talk, but the walk to go right along with it.
When you see those signs in your neighborhood, watch commercials during your favorite show, or hear “I’m so-and-so, and I approve this message” on your commute to and from work, you may want to take a look at that candidate’s resume, not just at their flashy, expensive suit and those killer shoes.
-Lacey Earls, ODP Intern
It would be my worst nightmare to walk into a job interview and have my potential employer judge me solely on how much money I spent to get there. My clothes are less important than what I have to offer to this employer… right? Impressions are important, yes, but so are credentials. Do I have the qualifications? Do I have experience where experience is necessary? These are the important things when I’m trying to sell myself in the job market.
The same can be said for those running for president. With primaries inching closer every day, the yard signs are coming. Billboards will pop up along the road, and the endless radio and television commercials will be here before we know what hit us. Some things never change. But with all the visibility, will the candidates behind the signs and air-time have the experience that is crucial as this country moves forward?
Bill Richardson, current governor of New Mexico, is one candidate that hopefully can overcome the fluff put out by competitors to show us that he can hit the ground running.
Concerned with the environment? As governor of New Mexico he required that 10 percent of all energy come from renewable sources, and is now guiding the state in moving toward 20 percent. Incentives for such energy programs would not only decrease dependency on foreign sources, but it would also aid in the start to his plan to reverse global warming. During his term as Energy Secretary under the Clinton administration, he implemented efficiency standards to save energy. He’s got experience.
Need a job? Richardson has helped to create 84,000 new jobs in one of the poorest states in America. By creating jobs in industries associated with renewable energy, in the aerospace field and communications, Richardson has impacted not only the economy in New Mexico, but the lives of several thousand in his state. Now imagine that on a national scale. While serving in Congress, he helped in the passage of President Clinton’s economic plan that created millions of jobs, which in turn led to the first balanced budget in America in 30 years.
Foreign policy? Richardson agrees that terrorism is the United States’ number one national security challenge. Richardson’s experience negotiating the release of numerous hostages has given him a sense of respect with many foreign leaders, which is possible to lead to the restoration of America’s standing in the world. He knows what it takes in the real world to make things work, and he has the credentials to prove it. Serving as the Ambassador to the U.N. gave him time to work with world leaders that will be crucial in repairing the United States’ standing in the world. That’s proof.
Just by examining these three points, Bill Richardson has much more experience on his resume than the other candidates running for the Democratic ticket. It appears that he not only has the talk, but the walk to go right along with it.
When you see those signs in your neighborhood, watch commercials during your favorite show, or hear “I’m so-and-so, and I approve this message” on your commute to and from work, you may want to take a look at that candidate’s resume, not just at their flashy, expensive suit and those killer shoes.
-Lacey Earls, ODP Intern
Help Kerry end war in IraqThis time around, Senator John Kerry is taking a different kind of campaign approach. Rather than joining Edwards, Clinton and others in the 2008 Presidential race, Kerry has launched his own campaign. Instead of fighting for the Oval Office, Kerry is fighting to put an end to the war in Iraq. Kerry plans to battle the war in Iraq by, “introducing legislation that will again set a firm one-year deadline for the redeployment of most American troops from Iraq”. Over 25,000 have already joined Kerry, and if you too want to help, visit his website http://www.setadeadline.com/ to be a co-sponsor of his legislation.
-Whitney Denton
According to an associated press article on Cnn.com former vice president and presidential candidate Al Gore's supporters are plotting to to draft Gore to run for the demoratic nomination. Click Here to read more.
Jake Andrews ODP Intern
Jake Andrews ODP Intern